The Algorithmic-Human Manager: AI, Apps, and Workers in the Indian Gig Economy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19975v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 09:12:21 GMT
• Title: The Algorithmic-Human Manager: AI, Apps, and Workers in the Indian Gig Economy
• Abstract summary: This paper examines the impact of artificial intelligence and digital technologies on the blue collar gig economy in India.<n>It focuses on algorithmic management he use of automated systems to allocate, monitor, and evaluate work in location-based services such as ride sharing and delivery.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper examines the impact of artificial intelligence and digital technologies on the blue-collar gig economy in India, focusing on algorithmic management. This paper examines the impact of artificial intelligence and digital technologies on the blue collar gig economy in India, focusing on algorithmic management he use of automated systems to allocate, monitor, and evaluate work in location-based services such as ride sharing and delivery. Using a social justice framework and a mixed-methods approach comprising interviews with 16 gig workers and 21 key stakeholders, the study uncovers a dual reality: while AI-powered systems expand access to work and generate operational efficiencies, they simultaneously introduce significant challenges related to fairness, transparency, and worker dignity. Key findings reveal that algorithmic systems are opaque by design, produce inequitable outcomes, and are not structured to reward additional labour with proportionate pay. The study advocates for a pragmatic hybrid governance model an Algorithmic Human Manager framework in which technological efficiency and human accountability operate together rather than in opposition. The findings carry implications for policymakers, platform companies, and civil society organizations working to design equitable AI governance frameworks for the gig economy in India and across the Global South.

Related papers

• AI-Driven Feedback Systems, Digital Labour, and Silent Quitting: Transforming African Workplaces [0.0]
  This paper investigates how AI-driven feedback mechanisms are changing African workplaces.<n>It explores how AI can assist organisations in identifying early disengagement and enable intervention and better employee communication.<n>At the same time, we address the challenges of socioeconomic development and governance posed by AI implementation in developing countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-14T18:25:26Z)
• When Does AI Augment Work? A Workflow-Level Framework for Human-Agent Collaboration [78.16115745870405]
  We aim to characterise the value of artificial intelligence in the workplace.<n>Current studies largely measure this value in terms of the current automation capabilities and public adoption of AI.<n>To account for this, we must expand the scope of our analysis beyond atomised tasks of today.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-11T06:29:34Z)
• Keeping an Eye on AI: A Framework for Effective Human Oversight of AI Systems [46.60248293123689]
  This paper advances a practical framework for effective human oversight of AI systems.<n>It draws on insights from computer science, human-computer interaction, psychology, philosophy, and law.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T22:35:41Z)
• Beyond Automation: Rethinking Work, Creativity, and Governance in the Age of Generative AI [0.0]
  generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems are reshaping the nature, distribution and meaning of work, creativity, and economic security.<n>This paper investigates four inter-related phenomena in the current AI era: (1) the evolving landscape of employment and the future of work; (2) the diverse patterns of AI adoption across socio-demographic groups, sectors, and geographies; and (3) whether universal basic income (UBI) should become a compulsory policy response to the AI revolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T20:25:24Z)
• Modelling of Economic Implications of Bias in AI-Powered Health Emergency Response Systems [0.0]
  We analyze how algorithmic bias affects resource allocation, health outcomes, and social welfare. We propose mitigation strategies, including fairness-constrained optimization, algorithmic adjustments, and policy interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T17:11:23Z)
• Towards the Terminator Economy: Assessing Job Exposure to AI through LLMs [10.844598404826355]
  One-third of U.S. employment is highly exposed to AI, primarily in high-skill jobs requiring a graduate or postgraduate level of education.<n>Even in high-skill occupations, AI exhibits high variability in task substitution, suggesting that AI and humans complement each other within the same occupation.<n>All results, models, and code are freely available online to allow the community to reproduce our results, compare outcomes, and use our work as a benchmark to monitor AI's progress over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-27T08:14:18Z)
• Exploiting the Margin: How Capitalism Fuels AI at the Expense of Minoritized Groups [0.0]
  This paper explores the relationship between capitalism, racial injustice, and artificial intelligence (AI) It argues that AI acts as a contemporary vehicle for age-old forms of exploitation. The paper promotes an approach that integrates social justice and equity into the core of technological design and policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T22:40:07Z)
• Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
  There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)
• FATE in AI: Towards Algorithmic Inclusivity and Accessibility [0.0]
  To prevent algorithmic disparities, fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics (FATE) in AI are being implemented. This study examines FATE-related desiderata, particularly transparency and ethics, in areas of the global South that are underserved by AI. To promote inclusivity, a community-led strategy is proposed to collect and curate representative data for responsible AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-03T15:08:10Z)
• Future Computer Systems and Networking Research in the Netherlands: A Manifesto [137.47124933818066]
  We draw attention to CompSys as a vital part of ICT. Each of the Top Sectors of the Dutch Economy, each route in the National Research Agenda, and each of the UN Sustainable Development Goals pose challenges that cannot be addressed without CompSys advances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T11:02:29Z)
• AI Assurance using Causal Inference: Application to Public Policy [0.0]
  Most AI approaches can only be represented as "black boxes" and suffer from the lack of transparency. It is crucial not only to develop effective and robust AI systems, but to make sure their internal processes are explainable and fair.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-01T16:03:06Z)
• The AI Economist: Optimal Economic Policy Design via Two-level Deep Reinforcement Learning [126.37520136341094]
  We show that machine-learning-based economic simulation is a powerful policy and mechanism design framework. The AI Economist is a two-level, deep RL framework that trains both agents and a social planner who co-adapt. In simple one-step economies, the AI Economist recovers the optimal tax policy of economic theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-05T17:42:35Z)
• Watch-And-Help: A Challenge for Social Perception and Human-AI Collaboration [116.28433607265573]
  We introduce Watch-And-Help (WAH), a challenge for testing social intelligence in AI agents. In WAH, an AI agent needs to help a human-like agent perform a complex household task efficiently. We build VirtualHome-Social, a multi-agent household environment, and provide a benchmark including both planning and learning based baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T21:48:31Z)
• The AI Economist: Improving Equality and Productivity with AI-Driven Tax Policies [119.07163415116686]
  We train social planners that discover tax policies that can effectively trade-off economic equality and productivity. We present an economic simulation environment that features competitive pressures and market dynamics. We show that AI-driven tax policies improve the trade-off between equality and productivity by 16% over baseline policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-28T06:57:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.