Predictability as a Fine-Grained Measure for Privacy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20546v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 17:55:31 GMT
• Title: Predictability as a Fine-Grained Measure for Privacy
• Abstract summary: We introduce privacy via predictability, a fine-grained framework that explicitly incorporates the attacker's core knowledge.<n> predictability provides a finer-grained privacy metric tailored to specific sensitive information and specific attacker models.<n>Our approach is complementary to Differential privacy (DP) and can be used alongside DP to provide fine-grained privacy control.
• Score: 4.861418621297099
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Differential privacy (DP) ensures rigorous individual-level privacy guarantees against even the most knowledgeable attackers, but its worst-case nature can impose a costly privacy-accuracy tradeoff. We introduce privacy via predictability, a fine-grained framework that explicitly incorporates the attacker's core knowledge, a compromised portion of the dataset generated by a stochastic process, and a specified family of queries. Predictability measures privacy leakage as the incremental gain in an attacker's ability to predict sensitive information about unknown individuals after observing the algorithm's output, beyond what can already be inferred from the compromised data. We show that predictability and DP are generally incomparable: each can be small while the other is large. However, in the worst-case regime where all but one individual is compromised, and all binary queries are considered sensitive, predictability implies mutual-information DP. More generally, predictability provides a finer-grained privacy metric tailored to specific sensitive information and specific attacker models. We introduce a general framework, using the generalized method of moments (GMM), to analyze asymptotic predictability when the compromised data is generated by a stationary, ergodic, mixing process. Using this analysis, we derive a predictability-calibrated output perturbation scheme for ERM. Our approach is complementary to DP and can be used alongside DP to provide fine-grained privacy control.

Related papers

• Your Privacy Depends on Others: Collusion Vulnerabilities in Individual Differential Privacy [50.66105844449181]
  Individual Differential Privacy (iDP) promises users control over their privacy, but this promise can be broken in practice.<n>We reveal a previously overlooked vulnerability in sampling-based iDP mechanisms.<n>We propose $(varepsilon_i,_i,overline)$-iDP a privacy contract that uses $$-divergences to provide users with a hard upper bound on their excess vulnerability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T10:26:12Z)
• GPM: The Gaussian Pancake Mechanism for Planting Undetectable Backdoors in Differential Privacy [4.281902449361707]
  Several incidents of unintended privacy loss have occurred due to numerical issues and inappropriate configurations of Differential Privacy software.<n>We present the Gaussian pancake mechanism (GPM), a novel mechanism that is computationally indistinguishable from the widely used Gaussian mechanism (GM)<n>Unlike the unintentional privacy loss caused by GM's numerical issues, GPM is an adversarial yet undetectable backdoor attack against data privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-28T12:14:06Z)
• On the MIA Vulnerability Gap Between Private GANs and Diffusion Models [51.53790101362898]
  Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and diffusion models have emerged as leading approaches for high-quality image synthesis.<n>We present the first unified theoretical and empirical analysis of the privacy risks faced by differentially private generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T14:18:22Z)
• Beyond the Worst Case: Extending Differential Privacy Guarantees to Realistic Adversaries [17.780319275883127]
  Differential Privacy is a family of definitions that bound the worst-case privacy leakage of a mechanism.<n>This work sheds light on what the worst-case guarantee of DP implies about the success of attackers that are more representative of real-world privacy risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T20:36:31Z)
• Pseudo-Probability Unlearning: Towards Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Machine Unlearning [59.29849532966454]
  We propose PseudoProbability Unlearning (PPU), a novel method that enables models to forget data to adhere to privacy-preserving manner. Our method achieves over 20% improvements in forgetting error compared to the state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T21:27:06Z)
• Enhanced Privacy Bound for Shuffle Model with Personalized Privacy [32.08637708405314]
  Differential Privacy (DP) is an enhanced privacy protocol which introduces an intermediate trusted server between local users and a central data curator. It significantly amplifies the central DP guarantee by anonymizing and shuffling the local randomized data. This work focuses on deriving the central privacy bound for a more practical setting where personalized local privacy is required by each user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T16:11:56Z)
• Provable Privacy with Non-Private Pre-Processing [56.770023668379615]
  We propose a general framework to evaluate the additional privacy cost incurred by non-private data-dependent pre-processing algorithms. Our framework establishes upper bounds on the overall privacy guarantees by utilising two new technical notions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T17:54:49Z)
• On the Query Complexity of Training Data Reconstruction in Private Learning [0.0]
  We analyze the number of queries that a whitebox adversary needs to make to a private learner in order to reconstruct its training data. For $(epsilon, delta)$ DP learners with training data drawn from any arbitrary compact metric space, we provide the emphfirst known lower bounds on the adversary's query complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T00:49:38Z)
• How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
  We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss. We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z)
• Privacy-Preserving Distributed Expectation Maximization for Gaussian Mixture Model using Subspace Perturbation [4.2698418800007865]
  federated learning is motivated by the privacy concern as it does not allow to transmit private data but only intermediate updates. We propose a fully decentralized privacy-preserving solution, which is able to securely compute the updates in each step. Numerical validation shows that the proposed approach has superior performance compared to the existing approach in terms of both the accuracy and privacy level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-16T09:58:03Z)
• Graph-Homomorphic Perturbations for Private Decentralized Learning [64.26238893241322]
  Local exchange of estimates allows inference of data based on private data. perturbations chosen independently at every agent, resulting in a significant performance loss. We propose an alternative scheme, which constructs perturbations according to a particular nullspace condition, allowing them to be invisible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-23T10:35:35Z)
• Bounding, Concentrating, and Truncating: Unifying Privacy Loss Composition for Data Analytics [2.614355818010333]
  We provide strong privacy loss bounds when an analyst may select pure DP, bounded range (e.g. exponential mechanisms) or concentrated DP mechanisms in any order. We also provide optimal privacy loss bounds that apply when an analyst can select pure DP and bounded range mechanisms in a batch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T17:33:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.