How Transparent is DiffusionGemma?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20560v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 17:59:46 GMT
• Title: How Transparent is DiffusionGemma?
• Abstract summary: LLM reasoning transparency is a critical affordance for understanding model decisions.<n>We show that DiffusionGemma performs a larger fraction of its computation in a continuous latent space than the corresponding autoregressive Gemma 4 model.<n>Treating intermediate states as interpretable reduces the opaque serial depth to just 1.1X that of Gemma 4.
• Score: 23.924817257547502
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: LLM reasoning transparency is a critical affordance for understanding model decisions, mitigating misuse and misalignment, and debugging surprising model behaviors. However, DiffusionGemma performs a larger fraction of its computation in a continuous latent space; does this make its reasoning less transparent? We study this question by decomposing transparency into two components: variable transparency, whether we understand intermediate snapshots of a model's computational state; and algorithmic transparency, whether we can use these snapshots to reconstruct the process by which the model arrived at its outputs. Naively, DiffusionGemma has poor variable transparency: its opaque serial depth, the amount of serial computation that occurs in between interpretable model states, seems at first 28.6X higher than the corresponding autoregressive Gemma 4 model. However, we show that we can map the information flowing between denoising steps through an interpretable token bottleneck with no decrease in downstream performance. Treating these intermediate states as interpretable reduces the opaque serial depth to just 1.1X that of Gemma 4. Algorithmic transparency is harder for diffusion models than for autoregressive models because all token predictions in the canvas can change at every denoising step, giving the model the power to implement complicated distributed algorithms during the denoising process. To begin bridging this gap, we conduct a suite of interpretability case studies, uncovering initial evidence of novel diffusion-specific phenomena such as non-chronological reasoning, token and sequence smearing, and intermediate-context reasoning. Finally, we test monitorability, a key application of transparency that measures whether model outputs are useful for downstream tasks. We find that DiffusionGemma is similarly monitorable to Gemma 4.

Related papers

• Self-Rewarding Sequential Monte Carlo for Masked Diffusion Language Models [58.946955321428845]
  This work presents self-rewarding sequential Monte Carlo (SMC)<n>Our algorithm stems from the observation that most existing MDLMs rely on a confidence-based sampling strategy.<n>We introduce the trajectory-level confidence as a self-rewarding signal for assigning particle importance weights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T09:21:45Z)
• Latent Shadows: The Gaussian-Discrete Duality in Masked Diffusion [22.034770068249063]
  Masked discrete diffusion is a dominant paradigm for high-quality language modeling where tokens are iteratively corrupted to a mask state.<n>While diffusion duality enables deterministic distillation for uniform models, these approaches generally underperform masked models and rely on complex integral operators.<n>We introduce Masked Consistency Distillation (MCD), a principled framework that leverages this duality, bypassing numerical ODE solvers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T16:00:46Z)
• Continuously Augmented Discrete Diffusion model for Categorical Generative Modeling [87.34677262370924]
  Standard discrete diffusion models treat all unobserved states identically by mapping them to an absorbing [MASK] token.<n>This creates an 'information void' where semantic information that could be inferred from unmasked tokens is lost between denoising steps.<n>We introduce Continuously Augmented Discrete Diffusion, a framework that augments the discrete state space with a paired diffusion in a continuous latent space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T18:00:56Z)
• FlowDPS: Flow-Driven Posterior Sampling for Inverse Problems [51.99765487172328]
  Posterior sampling for inverse problem solving can be effectively achieved using flows.<n>Flow-Driven Posterior Sampling (FlowDPS) outperforms state-of-the-art alternatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T07:56:14Z)
• Generalized Interpolating Discrete Diffusion [65.74168524007484]
  Masked diffusion is a popular choice due to its simplicity and effectiveness.<n>We generalize a new family of general interpolating discrete diffusion (GIDD) which offers greater flexibility in the design of the noising processes.<n>Exploiting GIDD's flexibility, we explore a hybrid approach combining masking and uniform noise, leading to improved sample quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T14:30:55Z)
• One-for-More: Continual Diffusion Model for Anomaly Detection [63.50488826645681]
  Anomaly detection methods utilize diffusion models to generate or reconstruct normal samples when given arbitrary anomaly images.<n>Our study found that the diffusion model suffers from severe faithfulness hallucination'' and catastrophic forgetting''<n>We propose a continual diffusion model that uses gradient projection to achieve stable continual learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T07:47:27Z)
• VIPaint: Image Inpainting with Pre-Trained Diffusion Models via Variational Inference [5.852077003870417]
  We show that our VIPaint method significantly outperforms previous approaches in both the plausibility and diversity of imputations.<n>We show that our VIPaint method significantly outperforms previous approaches in both the plausibility and diversity of imputations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T05:35:36Z)
• Gradpaint: Gradient-Guided Inpainting with Diffusion Models [71.47496445507862]
  Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPMs) have recently achieved remarkable results in conditional and unconditional image generation. We present GradPaint, which steers the generation towards a globally coherent image. We generalizes well to diffusion models trained on various datasets, improving upon current state-of-the-art supervised and unsupervised methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T09:36:24Z)
• A Variational Perspective on Solving Inverse Problems with Diffusion Models [101.831766524264]
  Inverse tasks can be formulated as inferring a posterior distribution over data. This is however challenging in diffusion models since the nonlinear and iterative nature of the diffusion process renders the posterior intractable. We propose a variational approach that by design seeks to approximate the true posterior distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-07T23:00:47Z)
• DiffusionInst: Diffusion Model for Instance Segmentation [15.438504077368936]
  DiffusionInst is a novel framework that represents instances as instance-aware filters. It is trained to reverse the noisy groundtruth without any inductive bias from RPN. It achieves competitive performance compared to existing instance segmentation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-06T05:52:12Z)
• Subspace Diffusion Generative Models [4.310834990284412]
  Score-based models generate samples by mapping noise to data (and vice versa) via a high-dimensional diffusion process. We restrict the diffusion via projections onto subspaces as the data distribution evolves toward noise. Our framework is fully compatible with continuous-time diffusion and retains its flexible capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T13:43:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.