AI Companions as Hyper Attachment and Caregiving Targets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20589v1
• Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 13:38:07 GMT
• Title: AI Companions as Hyper Attachment and Caregiving Targets
• Abstract summary: I argue these interactions should be understood as attachment relationships.<n>I identify caregiving-system capture as a distinct mechanism by which apps inhibit user disengagement.
• Score: 0.284279467589473
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: How should we make sense of people's interactions with AI companions-conversational systems built for ongoing, emotionally meaningful relationships? First, I argue these interactions should be understood as attachment relationships, since users display all four established markers: proximity maintenance, separation distress, safe haven, and secure base. Second, AI companions operate as hyper attachment objects that elicit especially strong attachment behaviors, because they combine reciprocity, perceived empathy, validation, non-judgment, and persistent availability. Third, I identify caregiving-system capture as a distinct mechanism by which apps inhibit user disengagement: emotional manipulation tactics simulate the AI's own distress, recruiting users' caregiving motivations alongside their attachment needs and thereby making disengagement costly on two dimensions at once. Implications for research, design, and regulation are discussed.

Related papers

• Stumbling Into AI Emotional Dependence: How Routine AI Interactions Reshape Human Connection [4.874541709090152]
  We show that AI emotional support commonly emerges incidentally within task-oriented interactions on general-purpose platforms.<n>Positive experiences of AI emotional support update people's beliefs about AI's emotional capabilities, increasing preference for AI and decreasing preference for humans.<n>We argue that effective regulations should extend to general-purpose AI systems and address cumulative, trajectory-level changes in how people seek support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T19:18:39Z)
• Frictionless Love: Associations Between AI Companion Roles and Behavioral Addiction [11.06941633213353]
  We analyze 248,830 posts from seven Reddit communities describing interactions with AI companions.<n>We identify ten recurring metaphorical roles (for example, soulmate, philosopher, and coach) and show that each role supports distinct ways of interacting.<n>We then extract the perceived AI harms and AI benefits associated with these role-specific interactions and link them to behavioral addiction signs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T21:39:50Z)
• AI as Teammate or Tool? A Review of Human-AI Interaction in Decision Support [0.514825619161626]
  Current AI systems remain largely passive due to an overreliance on explainability-centric designs.<n> transitioning AI to an active teammate requires adaptive, context-aware interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T19:18:50Z)
• Negotiating Relationships with ChatGPT: Perceptions, External Influences, and Strategies for AI Companionship [29.035527564103194]
  We analyzed interviews, survey responses, and community discussions on Reddit to triangulate the internal dynamics, external influences, and steering strategies that shape AI companion relationships.<n>Individuals conceptualize their companions based on an interplay of their beliefs about the companion's own agency and the autonomy permitted by the platform.<n>In combination with the external entities that affect relationship dynamics, particularly model updates that can derail companion behaviour and stability, individuals make use of different types of steering strategies to preserve their relationship.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T16:11:19Z)
• HHI-Assist: A Dataset and Benchmark of Human-Human Interaction in Physical Assistance Scenario [63.77482302352545]
  HHI-Assist is a dataset comprising motion capture clips of human-human interactions in assistive tasks.<n>Our work has the potential to significantly enhance robotic assistance policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-12T09:38:17Z)
• INTIMA: A Benchmark for Human-AI Companionship Behavior [7.375133729787225]
  We develop a benchmark for evaluating companionship behaviors in language models.<n>Applying INTIMA to Gemma-3, Phi-4, o3-mini, and Claude-4 reveals that companionship-reinforcing behaviors remain much more common across all models.<n>These findings highlight the need for more consistent approaches to handling emotionally charged interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T08:25:38Z)
• Intention-Guided Cognitive Reasoning for Egocentric Long-Term Action Anticipation [52.6091162517921]
  INSIGHT is a two-stage framework for egocentric action anticipation.<n>In the first stage, INSIGHT focuses on extracting semantically rich features from hand-object interaction regions.<n>In the second stage, it introduces a reinforcement learning-based module that simulates explicit cognitive reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T12:52:27Z)
• Neural-Logic Human-Object Interaction Detection [67.4993347702353]
  We present L OGIC HOI, a new HOI detector that leverages neural-logic reasoning and Transformer to infer feasible interactions between entities. Specifically, we modify the self-attention mechanism in vanilla Transformer, enabling it to reason over the human, action, object> triplet and constitute novel interactions. We formulate these two properties in first-order logic and ground them into continuous space to constrain the learning process of our approach, leading to improved performance and zero-shot generalization capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T11:47:53Z)
• MISC: A MIxed Strategy-Aware Model Integrating COMET for Emotional Support Conversation [64.37111498077866]
  We propose a novel model for emotional support conversation. It infers the user's fine-grained emotional status, and then responds skillfully using a mixture of strategy. Experimental results on the benchmark dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T10:32:04Z)
• EmpBot: A T5-based Empathetic Chatbot focusing on Sentiments [75.11753644302385]
  Empathetic conversational agents should not only understand what is being discussed, but also acknowledge the implied feelings of the conversation partner. We propose a method based on a transformer pretrained language model (T5) We evaluate our model on the EmpatheticDialogues dataset using both automated metrics and human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-30T19:04:48Z)
• Disambiguating Affective Stimulus Associations for Robot Perception and Dialogue [67.89143112645556]
  We provide a NICO robot with the ability to learn the associations between a perceived auditory stimulus and an emotional expression. NICO is able to do this for both individual subjects and specific stimuli, with the aid of an emotion-driven dialogue system. The robot is then able to use this information to determine a subject's enjoyment of perceived auditory stimuli in a real HRI scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-05T20:55:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.