What Accuracy and Gradient Cosine Miss: Evaluating Feedback Alignment via Scale Stability, Reference Validity, and Depth Utility

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21126v1
• Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 06:04:17 GMT
• Title: What Accuracy and Gradient Cosine Miss: Evaluating Feedback Alignment via Scale Stability, Reference Validity, and Depth Utility
• Abstract summary: We propose a diagnostic evaluation protocol based on three checks -- scale stability, reference validity, and depth utility -- together with per-layer rather than aggregate cosine reporting.<n>Across multiple architectures and methods, our protocol identifies all failures with wide calibration margins.
• Score: 48.10132234701036
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite the success of deep learning, training deep networks in biologically plausible and hardware-efficient ways remains an open challenge. Feedback alignment (FA) methods address this by replacing backpropagation's symmetric backward weights with fixed random matrices, but their effectiveness depends critically on whether they can be accurately evaluated. The standard evaluation relies on two quantities: task accuracy and cosine similarity between the method's credit signal and the backpropagation gradient. We show that this reporting pair is insufficient by identifying two independent failure modes, both silent under current reporting: (1) measurement degeneracy, where the BP reference gradient collapses to the numerical floor in terminal-LayerNorm residual architectures, rendering cosine uninterpretable; and (2) aggregation collapse, where the aggregate cosine masks layerwise heterogeneity that concentrates credit at one end of the network. To address these limitations, we propose a diagnostic evaluation protocol based on three checks -- scale stability, reference validity, and depth utility -- together with per-layer rather than aggregate cosine reporting. Across multiple architectures and methods, the standard reporting pair gives no signal of failure in any audited case, while our protocol identifies all failures with wide calibration margins. The two failure modes are causally independent: a per-block scale penalty alleviates Mode 1 (residual scale explosion driving reference collapse) without affecting Mode 2 (cosine ranking that contradicts every functional metric we measured). Identifying these silent failures prevents researchers from building on non-functional credit assignment and provides actionable guidance for developing FA methods that genuinely train deep layers.

Related papers

• Making two action heads agree: coordination mechanisms and a runtime collapse certificate for flow-matching policies [13.05465000489116]
  Flow-matching policy decodes each predicted motion into joint and end-effector spaces.<n>On multimodal tasks, independently sampled branches may choose different valid modes, causing false alarms.<n>We study how to coordinate the two branches and at what cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-16T13:57:36Z)
• Semi-Dense Matching Uncertainty Is Not Just Local Confidence [0.0]
  We propose a lightweight, post-hoc overall uncertainty estimation framework that introduces a two-component Laplace mixture model with only 9 learnable parameters.<n>The objective is to explicitly capture both the sharp local refinement noise and the broader tail of coarse-assignment failures.<n>Our method consistently improves downstream geometric accuracy across various pretrained-only matchers and robust estimators with minimal computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-09T13:01:20Z)
• When Does Consensus Mean Correctness? Measuring the Agreement-Accuracy Coupling with Semantics-Preserving Re-Rendering [0.8594140167290097]
  A model's agreement across perturbed inputs is used as a label-free reliability signal.<n>Rerendering beats resampling on both accuracy and reliability.<n>Fine-tuning on the model's own cross-render consensus inverts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T07:08:05Z)
• TwistedMerge: Certified Higher-Order Diagnostics and Abstention for Model Merging [0.48086260459837454]
  We formulate merging as a finite descent problem in which checkpoints are local objects, alignment maps are transitions, and cycle products are residuals.<n>We prove a constant-edge no-go result, frozen-complex three-way and pre-family error-control theorems, and a refinement test for comparison-complex sensitivity.<n>A trained low-rank-adapter audit shows that naive factor averaging depends on the chosen GLr representative, whereas global factor synchronization and dense-delta SVD are stable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T03:24:50Z)
• From Refusal Geometry to Safety Geometry: Harmfulness--Refusal Coupling under Dynamic Adversarial Fine-Tuning [14.6508023458559]
  Existing evaluations do not reveal whether a model has learned to recognize harmfulness.<n>We study this question with a dual safety-geometry protocol that measures harmfulness carriers, refusal carriers, and their coupling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-15T07:50:00Z)
• When Attribution Patching Lies: Diagnosis and a Second-Order Correction [9.338965648455238]
  We show that the dominant error stems from the non-linearities in the downstream network rather than local curvature at the patched component.<n>This insight yields three practical tools: (i) a reliability score to detect untrustworthy estimates, (ii) error bounds quantifying potential attribution mis-specifications, and (iii) a Hessian-vector-product correction that eliminates the leading-order error with only one additional backward pass.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-05T05:20:32Z)
• Architecture-agnostic Lipschitz-constant Bayesian header and its application to resolve semantically proximal classification errors with vision transformers [0.0]
  This work presents an architecture-agnostic Lipschitz-constant Bayesian header that can be integrated into feature extractors such as vision transformers.<n>We also propose a novel metric to capture uncertainty and confidence across misclassification rates, as well as an adaptive arithmetic-mean fusion scheme.<n>Although computational costs increase due to Monte Carlo sampling, the method offers plug-and-play compatibility with pre-trained backbones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T09:18:06Z)
• Beyond the Attention Stability Boundary: Agentic Self-Synthesizing Reasoning Protocols [6.357772907811544]
  Self- Synthesizing Reasoning Protocols (SSRP) is a metacognitive framework that implements a discrete separation between architectural planning and procedural execution.<n>We present 3 experimental tiers: a shallow recency-based retrieval pilot, a high-entropy SOP, and a semantic hijacked 3-hop Multi-Fact Synthesis task.<n>Our results empirically locate the Attention Stability Boundary, where stateless Vanilla ReAct baselines for GPT 5.4 collapse to 0.1% success while SSRP achieves a 715X Resilience Lift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T14:13:30Z)
• Unsupervised Conformal Inference: Bootstrapping and Alignment to Control LLM Uncertainty [49.19257648205146]
  We propose an unsupervised conformal inference framework for generation.<n>Our gates achieve close-to-nominal coverage and provide tighter, more stable thresholds than split UCP.<n>The result is a label-free, API-compatible gate for test-time filtering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T23:40:47Z)
• Integrating Disparity Confidence Estimation into Relative Depth Prior-Guided Unsupervised Stereo Matching [55.784713740698365]
  Unsupervised stereo matching has garnered significant attention for its independence from costly disparity annotations.<n>A feasible solution lies in transferring 3D geometric knowledge from a relative depth map to the stereo matching networks.<n>This work proposes a novel unsupervised learning framework to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T09:11:05Z)
• Uncertainty-aware Unsupervised Multi-Object Tracking [33.53331700312752]
  unsupervised multi-object trackers are inferior to learning reliable feature embeddings. Recent self-supervised techniques are adopted, whereas they failed to capture temporal relations. This paper argues that though the uncertainty problem is inevitable, it is possible to leverage the uncertainty itself to improve the learned consistency in turn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T09:03:06Z)
• Mitigating the Mutual Error Amplification for Semi-Supervised Object Detection [92.52505195585925]
  We propose a Cross Teaching (CT) method, aiming to mitigate the mutual error amplification by introducing a rectification mechanism of pseudo labels. In contrast to existing mutual teaching methods that directly treat predictions from other detectors as pseudo labels, we propose the Label Rectification Module (LRM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T03:34:57Z)
• Exploiting Sample Uncertainty for Domain Adaptive Person Re-Identification [137.9939571408506]
  We estimate and exploit the credibility of the assigned pseudo-label of each sample to alleviate the influence of noisy labels. Our uncertainty-guided optimization brings significant improvement and achieves the state-of-the-art performance on benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-16T04:09:04Z)
• Localization Uncertainty Estimation for Anchor-Free Object Detection [48.931731695431374]
  There are several limitations of the existing uncertainty estimation methods for anchor-based object detection. We propose a new localization uncertainty estimation method called UAD for anchor-free object detection. Our method captures the uncertainty in four directions of box offsets that are homogeneous, so that it can tell which direction is uncertain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T13:49:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.