When Does Intrinsic Self-Correction Help? A Task-Sensitive Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23196v1
• Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 11:44:29 GMT
• Title: When Does Intrinsic Self-Correction Help? A Task-Sensitive Analysis
• Abstract summary: Intrinsic self-correction (SC) aims to improve large language model outputs by prompting a model to revisit its own initial answer without external feedback.<n>Recent studies have questioned the reliability of this approach, showing that models often struggle to judge whether their initial responses are correct.
• Score: 14.887282030243185
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Intrinsic self-correction (SC) aims to improve large language model outputs by prompting a model to revisit its own initial answer without external feedback. Recent studies have questioned the reliability of this approach, showing that models often struggle to judge whether their initial responses are correct. In this work, we take a task-sensitive view of SC. Rather than asking whether it works in general, we examine settings where SC may operate through different mechanisms: verifying explicit constraints, revisiting a complex reasoning process, or providing a second opinion over competing strategies in word-game tasks. Across multiple benchmarks and models, we find that SC can yield consistent performance gains when the underlying task structure facilitates these modes of revision. These results suggest that SC is best understood as a task-dependent inference-time strategy whose usefulness depends on the role the revision stage can play in a given task, rather than as a uniformly reliable method for improving initial model outputs.

Related papers

• RASPRef: Retrieval-Augmented Self-Supervised Prompt Refinement for Large Reasoning Models [0.0]
  We introduce Retrieval-Augmented Self-Supervised Prompt Refinement (RASPRef), a framework that improves prompts without requiring human annotations or task-specific supervision.<n>RASPRef directly treats the prompt as the optimization target and improves it through an iterative retrieval-guided refinement process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-27T21:49:21Z)
• Decoding the Critique Mechanism in Large Reasoning Models [50.821607345799386]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) exhibit backtracking and self-verification mechanisms that enable them to revise intermediate steps and reach correct solutions.<n>We investigate how current LRMs recover from errors by inserting arithmetic mistakes in their intermediate reasoning steps.<n>We find that despite the error propagating through the chain-of-thought, the model still reaches the correct final answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T10:03:30Z)
• Structured Reasoning for Large Language Models [59.215789462977206]
  We propose Structured Reasoning (SCR), a framework that decouples reasoning trajectories into explicit, evaluable, and trainable components.<n>SCR substantially improves reasoning efficiency and self-verification.<n>Compared with existing reasoning paradigms, it reduces output token length by up to 50%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T04:04:01Z)
• LLM Probing with Contrastive Eigenproblems: Improving Understanding and Applicability of CCS [0.17188280334580197]
  We argue that what should be optimized for, is relative contrast consistency.<n>We reformulate CCS as an eigenproblem, yielding closed-form solutions with interpretable eigenvalues and natural extensions to multiple variables.<n>Our results suggest that relativizing contrast consistency not only improves our understanding of CCS but also opens pathways for broader probing and mechanistic interpretability methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-03T22:00:37Z)
• AURORA: Augmented Understanding via Structured Reasoning and Reinforcement Learning for Reference Audio-Visual Segmentation [113.75682363364004]
  AURORA is a framework designed to enhance genuine reasoning and language comprehension in reference audio-visual segmentation.<n>AURORA achieves state-of-the-art performance on Ref-AVS benchmarks and generalizes effectively to unreferenced segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T07:47:38Z)
• Enhancing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Prompting and Reinforcement Learning [0.42855555838080844]
  This study investigates the spatial reasoning capabilities of vision-language models (VLMs) through Chain-of-Thought prompting and reinforcement learning.<n>We find that simple CoT formats, where the model generates a reasoning step before the answer, can harm the model's original performance.<n>In contrast, structured multi-stage prompting based on scene graphs (SceneGraph CoT) significantly improves spatial reasoning accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-06T10:51:12Z)
• Retrieval is Not Enough: Enhancing RAG Reasoning through Test-Time Critique and Optimization [58.390885294401066]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted paradigm for enabling knowledge-grounded large language models (LLMs)<n>RAG pipelines often fail to ensure that model reasoning remains consistent with the evidence retrieved, leading to factual inconsistencies or unsupported conclusions.<n>We propose AlignRAG, a novel iterative framework grounded in Critique-Driven Alignment (CDA)<n>We introduce AlignRAG-auto, an autonomous variant that dynamically terminates refinement, removing the need to pre-specify the number of critique iterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T04:56:47Z)
• Read Before You Think: Mitigating LLM Comprehension Failures with Step-by-Step Reading [2.073147245888634]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often fail on complex reasoning tasks due to flawed question comprehension.<n>This paper presents a systematic investigation into these comprehension failures.<n>We introduce the Step-by-Step Reading (SSR) family of prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-13T02:10:18Z)
• ReVISE: Learning to Refine at Test-Time via Intrinsic Self-Verification [53.80183105328448]
  Refine via Intrinsic Self-Verification (ReVISE) is an efficient framework that enables LLMs to self-correct their outputs through self-verification.<n>Our experiments on various reasoning tasks demonstrate that ReVISE achieves efficient self-correction and significantly improves reasoning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T13:50:02Z)
• Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Critique Models with Test-Time and Training-Time Supervision [120.40788744292739]
  We propose a two-player paradigm that separates the roles of reasoning and critique models. We first propose AutoMathCritique, an automated and scalable framework for collecting critique data. We demonstrate that the critique models consistently improve the actor's performance on difficult queries at test-time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T17:11:54Z)
• Recursive Introspection: Teaching Language Model Agents How to Self-Improve [30.086494067593268]
  We develop RISE: Recursive IntroSpEction, an approach for fine-tuning large language models. Our experiments show that RISE enables Llama2, Llama3, and Mistral models to improve themselves with more turns on math reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T17:35:59Z)
• Spurious Feature Eraser: Stabilizing Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Foundation Model [86.9619638550683]
  Vision-language foundation models have exhibited remarkable success across a multitude of downstream tasks due to their scalability on extensive image-text paired data.<n>However, these models display significant limitations when applied to downstream tasks, such as fine-grained image classification, as a result of decision shortcuts''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T09:01:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.