Group Selection Promotes Prosocial Prompts in Populations of LLM Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23343v1
• Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 13:47:19 GMT
• Title: Group Selection Promotes Prosocial Prompts in Populations of LLM Agents
• Abstract summary: We study whether group selection can promote cooperation in populations of large language model (LLM) agents.<n>Under group selection, prompts from high-performing groups are transmitted, thereby promoting prosociality and stabilizing cooperation.<n>Preliminary findings show that, when informed about the selection mechanism, GPT-5.4 preemptively and gradually adjusts first-generation donations.
• Score: 1.7004466773233589
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Current approaches to instill prosociality in large language model (LLM) agents often rely on humans specifying desired behaviors at the individual level, which does not guarantee cooperation within LLM populations. As frontier training shifts toward individual rewards for verifiable tasks, such as mathematics and coding, this outcome-based focus may further undermine cooperation in multi-agent settings. Large-scale cooperation in human populations emerged via unguided evolutionary mechanisms, not a central architect. Group selection, in which cooperative groups within a population outcompete less cooperative ones, has been argued to be essential. In this study, we explore whether group selection can promote cooperation in populations of LLM agents. We introduce a multi-agent simulation framework in which LLM agents play a repeated social dilemma game and transmit their natural-language prompts across generations under either individual- or group-level selection. Under group selection, prompts from high-performing groups are transmitted, thereby promoting prosociality and stabilizing cooperation. Under individual selection, self-interested prompts dominate, causing populations to collapse into collective defection. This gap is robust across prompt ablations, alternative game framings, and model swaps. We theoretically reproduce key results using a replicator-mutator model, whose empirical transmission kernel predicts a phase transition at a critical threshold. Preliminary findings show that, when informed about the selection mechanism, GPT-5.4 preemptively and gradually adjusts first-generation donations. This demonstrates strong anticipatory behavior that was not observed in the other tested models. These results demonstrate that prosocial prompts and cooperative behaviors evolve in LLM agent populations under group selection.

Related papers

• From Process Loss to Assembly Bonus: Human-Grounded Diagnosis of Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration [11.269223379412315]
  We compare human group chats with matched LLM deliberation traces on Wason-style deductive reasoning.<n>We show the same assembly bonus asymmetry: discussion improves the average member more often than the best initial member.<n>These results suggest that LLM groups can reproduce some outcome-level patterns of human deliberation while diverging in the mechanisms that generate assembly bonus and process loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-06T17:58:09Z)
• Collective cooperation without individual fidelity in LLM agents [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as agents in simulations of social systems.<n>It remains unclear when their behavior can be interpreted as a faithful proxy for human decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-29T15:22:21Z)
• MobEvolve: An Agentic Self-Evolving Heuristic System for Interpretable Human Mobility Generation [51.824145170051516]
  MobEvolve is a self-evolving framework for human mobility generation.<n>It employs an agent to iteratively evolve its internal logic.<n>It significantly outperforms state-of-the-art deep generative and LLM-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T03:46:25Z)
• Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems [65.90791804095561]
  Multi-agent systems address this through structured collaboration among specialized agents, but tighter coordination amplifies a less explored risk.<n>Existing surveys cover individual agent capabilities, multi-agent collaboration, or agent self-evolution separately, leaving the causal dependencies among them unexamined.<n>This survey provides a unified review organized around four causally linked stages, which we term the LIFE progression: Lay the capability foundation, Integrate agents through collaboration, Find faults through attribution, and Evolve through autonomous self-improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T14:36:13Z)
• When Is Collective Intelligence a Lottery? Multi-Agent Scaling Laws for Memetic Drift in LLMs [19.42697228981973]
  We show that in naming games, even when no individual agent favors any label a priori, populations rapidly break symmetry and reach consensus.<n>We reveal the mechanism by introducing a minimal model, Quantized Simplex Gossip (QSG), and trace the microscopic origin of this agreement to mutual in-context learning.<n>We derive scaling laws for drift-induced polarization as a function of population size, communication bandwidth, in-context adaptation rate, and agents' internal uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-25T18:00:29Z)
• Position: AI Agents Are Not (Yet) a Panacea for Social Simulation [62.891898598784415]
  Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have spurred growing interest in using LLM-integrated agents for social simulation.<n>This position paper argues that LLM-based agents are not (yet) a panacea for social simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T06:35:07Z)
• Learning Robust Social Strategies with Large Language Models [7.697496386429445]
  Reinforcement learning is effective for aligning large language models (LLMs) in the single-agent regime.<n>We show that standard RL in multi-agent settings often converges to defecting, self-interested policies.<n>To address this tendency of RL to converge to poor equilibria, we adapt a recent opponent-learning awareness algorithm, Advantage Alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-24T18:43:46Z)
• CoMAS: Co-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems via Interaction Rewards [80.78748457530718]
  Self-evolution is a central research topic in enabling large language model (LLM)-based agents to continually improve their capabilities after pretraining.<n>We introduce Co-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems (CoMAS), a novel framework that enables agents to improve autonomously by learning from inter-agent interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T17:50:26Z)
• Prompt Optimization Across Multiple Agents for Representing Diverse Human Populations [24.453294687297984]
  We propose a framework to construct a set of agents that collectively capture the diversity of a given human population.<n>Each agent is an LLM whose behavior is steered by conditioning on a small set of human demonstrations.<n>We show that our approach constructs agents that more effectively represent human populations compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T14:28:53Z)
• Emergent Coordination in Multi-Agent Language Models [2.504366738288215]
  We introduce an information-theoretic framework to test whether multi-agent systems show signs of higher-order structure.<n>This information decomposition lets us measure whether dynamical emergence is present in multi-agent LLM systems.<n>We apply our framework to experiments using a simple guessing game without direct agent communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T11:26:41Z)
• Multi-Agent Collaboration via Evolving Orchestration [55.574417128944226]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable results across diverse downstream tasks, but their monolithic nature restricts scalability and efficiency in complex problem-solving.<n>We propose a puppeteer-style paradigm for LLM-based multi-agent collaboration, where a centralized orchestrator ("puppeteer") dynamically directs agents ("puppets") in response to evolving task states.<n> Experiments on closed- and open-domain scenarios show that this method achieves superior performance with reduced computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T07:02:17Z)
• HiddenBench: Assessing Collective Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs via Hidden Profile Tasks [12.203366267017737]
  We introduce HiddenBench, the first benchmark for evaluating collective reasoning in multi-agent LLMs.<n>To ground the benchmark, we formalize the paradigm with custom tasks and show that GPT-4.1 groups fail to integrate distributed knowledge.<n>We then construct the full benchmark, spanning 65 tasks drawn from custom designs, prior human studies, and automatic generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T19:22:54Z)
• Nature-Inspired Population-Based Evolution of Large Language Models [58.81047484922555]
  This paper formally defines a newly emerging problem -- the population-based evolution of large language models (LLMs)<n>Our framework enables the population to evolve through four key operations.<n> Experiments on 12 datasets show that our framework consistently outperforms existing multi-LLM merging and adaptation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T04:03:31Z)
• MALT: Improving Reasoning with Multi-Agent LLM Training [67.76186488361685]
  MALT (Multi-Agent LLM Training) is a novel post-training strategy that divides the reasoning process into generation, verification, and refinement steps.<n>On MATH, GSM8K, and CSQA, MALT surpasses the same baseline LLM with a relative improvement of 15.66%, 7.42%, and 9.40% respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T19:30:36Z)
• AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviors [93.38830440346783]
  We propose a multi-agent framework framework that can collaboratively adjust its composition as a greater-than-the-sum-of-its-parts system. Our experiments demonstrate that framework framework can effectively deploy multi-agent groups that outperform a single agent. In view of these behaviors, we discuss some possible strategies to leverage positive ones and mitigate negative ones for improving the collaborative potential of multi-agent groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T16:47:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.