Same Lesson, Different Story: Cross-Lingual Reconstruction of Cultural Narratives in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24610v1
• Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 14:10:34 GMT
• Title: Same Lesson, Different Story: Cross-Lingual Reconstruction of Cultural Narratives in Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: This study introduces a multilingual evaluation narrative framework that integrates a cross-linguistic collection of 414 proverbs spanning 15 languages.<n>The analysis assesses whether models preserve meaning across languages, how cross-lingual conditioning influences narrative realization, and whether different model families converge on similar interpretations.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The evaluation of cultural grounding context becomes complex when multiple cultures convey the same moral lesson. This challenge is particularly relevant to large language models (LLMs), which produce narratives across a wide range of languages and cultural contexts. However, it remains uncertain whether these models preserve culturally grounded meaning when equivalent moral lessons are conveyed through distinct cultural forms. This study introduces a multilingual evaluation narrative framework that integrates a cross-linguistic collection of 414 proverbs spanning 15 languages and uses four LLMs to generate 13k narratives. By employing semantically equivalent proverbs as culturally grounded prompts, the analysis assesses whether models preserve meaning across languages, how cross-lingual conditioning influences narrative realization, and whether different model families converge on similar interpretations. Results indicate that cross-lingual prompting largely preserves proverb-level semantic meaning while systematically redistributing agency, social positioning, and narrative structure. Additionally, strong inter-model convergence is observed in both monolingual and cross-lingual settings, suggesting that multilingual LLMs rely on shared semantic abstractions despite architectural and linguistic differences. These findings shed light on the need for more comprehensive evaluations of cultural grounding. Relying exclusively on semantic similarity in multilingual narrative assessments may overestimate cultural preservation by neglecting culturally meaningful variations in narrative expression.

Related papers

• Lessons Without Borders? Evaluating Cultural Alignment of LLMs Using Multilingual Story Moral Generation [3.8458777248623193]
  We introduce multilingual story moral generation as a novel culturally grounded evaluation task.<n>Using a new dataset of human-written story morals collected across 14 language-culture pairs, we compare model outputs with human interpretations.<n>We show that frontier models generate story morals that are semantically similar to human responses and preferred by human evaluators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T22:13:24Z)
• Metaphors We Compute By: A Computational Audit of Cultural Translation vs. Thinking in LLMs [15.854854496840074]
  Large language models (LLMs) are often described as multilingual because they can understand and respond in many languages.<n>This paper presents a preliminary computational audit of cultural inclusivity in a creative writing task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T15:00:05Z)
• Where Culture Fades: Revealing the Cultural Gap in Text-to-Image Generation [43.352493955825736]
  We show that current T2I models often produce culturally neutral or English-biased results under multilingual prompts.<n>We propose a probing method that localizes culture-sensitive signals to a small set of neurons in a few fixed layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T14:40:50Z)
• MMA-ASIA: A Multilingual and Multimodal Alignment Framework for Culturally-Grounded Evaluation [91.22008265721952]
  MMA-ASIA centers on a human-curated, multilingual, and multimodally aligned benchmark covering 8 Asian countries and 10 languages.<n>This is the first dataset aligned at the input level across three modalities: text, image (visual question answering), and speech.<n>We propose a five-dimensional evaluation protocol that measures: (i) cultural-awareness disparities across countries, (ii) cross-lingual consistency, (iii) cross-modal consistency, (iv) cultural knowledge generalization, and (v) grounding validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T14:12:12Z)
• Cross-Cultural Transfer of Commonsense Reasoning in LLMs: Evidence from the Arab World [68.19795061447044]
  This paper investigates cross-cultural transfer of commonsense reasoning in the Arab world.<n>Using a culturally grounded commonsense reasoning dataset covering 13 Arab countries, we evaluate lightweight alignment methods.<n>Our results show that merely 12 culture-specific examples from one country can improve performance in others by 10% on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T17:24:14Z)
• Disentangling Language and Culture for Evaluating Multilingual Large Language Models [48.06219053598005]
  This paper introduces a Dual Evaluation Framework to comprehensively assess the multilingual capabilities of LLMs.<n>By decomposing the evaluation along the dimensions of linguistic medium and cultural context, this framework enables a nuanced analysis of LLMs' ability to process questions cross-lingually.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T14:25:45Z)
• MAKIEval: A Multilingual Automatic WiKidata-based Framework for Cultural Awareness Evaluation for LLMs [37.98920430188422]
  MAKIEval is an automatic multilingual framework for evaluating cultural awareness in large language models.<n>It automatically identifies cultural entities in model outputs and links them to structured knowledge.<n>We assess 7 LLMs developed from different parts of the world, encompassing both open-source and proprietary systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T19:29:40Z)
• From Word to World: Evaluate and Mitigate Culture Bias in LLMs via Word Association Test [50.51344198689069]
  We extend the human-centered word association test (WAT) to assess the alignment of large language models with cross-cultural cognition.<n>To address culture preference, we propose CultureSteer, an innovative approach by embedding cultural-specific semantic associations directly within the model's internal representation space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T07:05:10Z)
• Extrinsic Evaluation of Cultural Competence in Large Language Models [53.626808086522985]
  We focus on extrinsic evaluation of cultural competence in two text generation tasks. We evaluate model outputs when an explicit cue of culture, specifically nationality, is perturbed in the prompts. We find weak correlations between text similarity of outputs for different countries and the cultural values of these countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T14:03:27Z)
• Investigating Cultural Alignment of Large Language Models [10.738300803676655]
  We show that Large Language Models (LLMs) genuinely encapsulate the diverse knowledge adopted by different cultures. We quantify cultural alignment by simulating sociological surveys, comparing model responses to those of actual survey participants as references. We introduce Anthropological Prompting, a novel method leveraging anthropological reasoning to enhance cultural alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T18:47:28Z)
• Multi-lingual and Multi-cultural Figurative Language Understanding [69.47641938200817]
  Figurative language permeates human communication, but is relatively understudied in NLP. We create a dataset for seven diverse languages associated with a variety of cultures: Hindi, Indonesian, Javanese, Kannada, Sundanese, Swahili and Yoruba. Our dataset reveals that each language relies on cultural and regional concepts for figurative expressions, with the highest overlap between languages originating from the same region. All languages exhibit a significant deficiency compared to English, with variations in performance reflecting the availability of pre-training and fine-tuning data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T15:30:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.