Visualizing "We the People": Bridging the Perception Gap through Pluralistic Data Storytelling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24635v2
• Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 14:10:08 GMT
• Title: Visualizing "We the People": Bridging the Perception Gap through Pluralistic Data Storytelling
• Abstract summary: Traditional visual data storytelling relies on binary graphics that depict two simplified groups in conflict.<n>This can increase political polarization by oversimplifying intra-group disagreements and erasing ambiguity and shared ideas or values.<n>Intentional, pluralistic design choices for AI-enabled digital platforms can produce visualizations that emphasize nuance, opinion distribution, and intergroup commonalities.
• Score: 0.5872662447648235
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Traditional visual data storytelling relies on binary graphics that depict two simplified groups in conflict. This can increase political polarization by oversimplifying intra-group disagreements and erasing ambiguity and shared ideas or values. This can inadvertently foster "us versus them" thinking. Intentional, pluralistic design choices for AI-enabled digital platforms can produce visualizations that emphasize nuance, opinion distribution, and intergroup commonalities. To demonstrate this potential, we examine deliberative technologies that map high-dimensional opinion spaces and highlight areas of both consensus and dissensus. The paper highlights the We the People deliberation conducted by Jigsaw and the Napolitan Institute in September 2025, which engaged over 2,400 Americans across all 435 congressional districts in an AI-supported, asynchronous dialogue regarding freedom and equality. By utilizing AI to synthesize long-form, text-based participant inputs into interactive "opinion landscapes," the initiative provided an alternative format for pluralistic data storytelling that humanized diverse viewpoints and revealed hidden areas of substantial broad consensus. The paper concludes that shifting from divisive, contrast-heavy visual frameworks to distribution-focused, interactive models represents a highly scalable, low-cost intervention capable of bridging perceptual gaps and cultivating a more resilient, collaborative democratic culture.

Related papers

• Automated Identification of Competing Narratives in Political Discourse on Social Media [0.0]
  This paper presents an unsupervised framework for identifying and characterizing competing narratives in political discourse on social media.<n>The framework is able to detect the key competing narratives, highlighting the divergent framings and conflicts surrounding trending political topics.<n>The findings contribute to the broader understanding of how narratives propagate within the digital public sphere.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-10T08:10:33Z)
• Think in Strokes, Not Pixels: Process-Driven Image Generation via Interleaved Reasoning [59.262311672150055]
  We introduce process-driven image generation, a multi-step paradigm that decomposes synthesis into an interleaved reasoning trajectory.<n>A core challenge of process-driven generation stems from the ambiguity of intermediate states.<n>We address this through dense, step-wise supervision that maintains two complementary constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T15:11:57Z)
• Can AI mediation improve democratic deliberation? [10.125698716274286]
  We ask whether and how artificial intelligence could help navigate the "trilemma" of broad participation, meaningful deliberation, and political equality.<n>We look at a large language model (LLM)-based system designed to help people with diverse viewpoints find common ground.<n>Ultimately, a range of empirical, technical, and theoretical advancements are needed to fully realize the promise of AI-mediated deliberation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T16:22:26Z)
• Latent Topic Synthesis: Leveraging LLMs for Electoral Ad Analysis [51.95395936342771]
  We introduce an end-to-end framework for automatically generating an interpretable topic taxonomy from an unlabeled corpus.<n>We apply this framework to a large corpus of Meta political ads from the month ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election.<n>Our approach uncovers latent discourse structures, synthesizes semantically rich topic labels, and annotates topics with moral framing dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T20:30:20Z)
• Identifying & Interactively Refining Ambiguous User Goals for Data Visualization Code Generation [48.63200319578052]
  We develop a taxonomy of types of ambiguity that arise in this task and propose metrics to quantify them.<n>Our work also explores how multi-turn dialogue can reduce ambiguity, therefore, improve code accuracy by better matching user goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T13:44:40Z)
• Whose View of Safety? A Deep DIVE Dataset for Pluralistic Alignment of Text-to-Image Models [29.501859416167385]
  Current text-to-image (T2I) models often fail to account for diverse human experiences, leading to misaligned systems.<n>We advocate for pluralistic alignment, where an AI understands and is steerable towards diverse, and often conflicting, human values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T21:02:35Z)
• PanoSent: A Panoptic Sextuple Extraction Benchmark for Multimodal Conversational Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis [74.41260927676747]
  This paper bridges the gaps by introducing a multimodal conversational Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) To benchmark the tasks, we construct PanoSent, a dataset annotated both manually and automatically, featuring high quality, large scale, multimodality, multilingualism, multi-scenarios, and covering both implicit and explicit sentiment elements. To effectively address the tasks, we devise a novel Chain-of-Sentiment reasoning framework, together with a novel multimodal large language model (namely Sentica) and a paraphrase-based verification mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-18T13:51:01Z)
• Decoding Visual Sentiment of Political Imagery [0.0]
  This study introduces a novel approach to visual sentiment analysis by integrating attitudinal differences into visual sentiment classification. We trained a deep learning multi-task multi-class model to predict visual sentiment from different ideological viewpoints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T21:44:56Z)
• Dimensions of Online Conflict: Towards Modeling Agonism [2.471304332463658]
  Agonism plays a vital role in democratic dialogue by fostering diverse perspectives and robust discussions. To model these two types of conflict, we collected Twitter conversations related to trending controversial topics. We introduce a comprehensive annotation schema for labelling different dimensions of conflict in the conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T22:34:17Z)
• CODER: Coupled Diversity-Sensitive Momentum Contrastive Learning for Image-Text Retrieval [108.48540976175457]
  We propose Coupled Diversity-Sensitive Momentum Constrastive Learning (CODER) for improving cross-modal representation. We introduce dynamic dictionaries for both modalities to enlarge the scale of image-text pairs, and diversity-sensitiveness is achieved by adaptive negative pair weighting. Experiments conducted on two popular benchmarks, i.e. MSCOCO and Flicker30K, validate CODER remarkably outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-21T08:37:50Z)
• $C^3$: Compositional Counterfactual Contrastive Learning for Video-grounded Dialogues [97.25466640240619]
  Video-grounded dialogue systems aim to integrate video understanding and dialogue understanding to generate responses relevant to both the dialogue and video context. Most existing approaches employ deep learning models and have achieved remarkable performance, given the relatively small datasets available. We propose a novel approach of Compositional Counterfactual Contrastive Learning to develop contrastive training between factual and counterfactual samples in video-grounded dialogues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-16T16:05:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.