Constraint Tax in Open-Weight LLMs: An Empirical Study of Tool Calling Suppression Under Structured Output Constraints

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.25605v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 09:14:18 GMT
• Title: Constraint Tax in Open-Weight LLMs: An Empirical Study of Tool Calling Suppression Under Structured Output Constraints
• Abstract summary: This paper reports reproducible phenomenon observed in a production Agent system.<n>Multiple open-weight models cease invoking tools despite maintaining high schema compliance.<n>We propose Transparent Two-Execution, an inference-time strategy that decouples tool execution from schema-constrained response generation.
• Score: 37.92327096151557
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Tool Calling and Structured Output are two core capabilities of modern Agent systems, yet their interaction under joint deployment conditions remains insufficiently understood. This paper reports a reproducible phenomenon observed in a production Agent system: when Tool Calling and JSON Schema constraints are simultaneously enabled, multiple open-weight models cease invoking tools despite maintaining high schema compliance. We refer to this behavior as Tool Suppression. Through controlled experiments across multiple model families and deployment settings, we consistently reproduce Tool Suppression under joint constraints, while tool execution and schema compliance remain functional when evaluated independently. Further analysis reveals that JSON Schema constraints are compiled into grammar-based token masks, causing tool-call tokens to become unreachable during decoding. This provides an implementation-level explanation for the observed behavior. To interpret the phenomenon, we formulate the Constraint Priority Inversion (CPI) hypothesis, which suggests that schema satisfaction may dominate action-selection behavior under multiple simultaneous constraints. We present CPI as a behavioral hypothesis consistent with the observed evidence rather than a verified internal mechanism. To mitigate the problem, we propose Transparent Two-Pass Execution, an inference-time strategy that decouples tool execution from schema-constrained response generation. Experimental results show that this approach restores tool invocation while preserving structured output guarantees without requiring model retraining. These findings suggest that evaluating tool use and structured output separately may overlook important reliability issues in production Agent systems. Code, data, and docs will be released at https://github.com/Fzsama/Constrain-Tax-26-06.git.

Related papers

• Agentic Security: A Systematization of Tools, Failure Modes, and Design Laws for LLM-Driven Penetration Testing [0.21990652930491858]
  Agentic security uses large-language-model (LLM) agents to plan, dispatch, and interpret security tools.<n>We systematize these failures through a hands-on evaluation of ten widely used static, dynamic, cloud, orchestration, and AI red-teaming tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-16T07:18:04Z)
• ScrambleToolBench: Agents Search Exhaustively Even When Their Own Map Points to the Next Step [74.83535434786145]
  We introduce ScrambleToolBench, an interactive terminal benchmark designed to isolate behavioral reasoning.<n>The benchmark requires agents to uncover hidden tool behaviors entirely through trial-and-error interaction.<n>Our evaluation of state-of-the-art language models reveals that successful initial discovery does not translate into robust adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T15:07:46Z)
• Verified Tool Calls Improve LLM Agent Reliability Under Non-Atomic Failures [0.0]
  Real-world systems exhibit non-atomic behaviors such as timeouts after dispatch, delayed visibility, and partial state updates.<n>These mismatches lead to reliability issues including duplicate actions, task success, and unnecessary tool executions.<n>A lightweight, verification-aware tool wrapper is introduced that augments tool calls with postcondition verification, verify-before-retry logic, and idempotency keys.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T16:16:14Z)
• Execution-First Synthetic Tool-Use Trace Generation for LLM Agents [10.291533584425252]
  SyntheticAgentTraceQA is an execution- first framework for generating scalable supervision data for tool- augmented agents.<n>We evaluate the framework across four tool ecosystems and use the resulting data to fine-tune and evaluate Qwen model variants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T08:52:26Z)
• Beyond the Eye: Efficient Multimodal Reasoning via Self-Regulated Implicit Visual Tools [65.7098588070281]
  We propose Beyond the Eye (BEE), a novel implicit visual tool paradigm centered on self-regulated capability.<n>BEE incorporates visual tool invocation behaviors into the training objective and encourages the model to develop a self-regulated invocation mechanism.<n>BEE achieves state-of-the-art performance in fine-grained visual perception while remaining competitive in general reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-13T05:32:00Z)
• Self-Healing Agentic Orchestrators for Reliable Tool-Augmented Large Language Model Systems [0.10210859604701106]
  Self-healing agentic orchestrator treats reliability as a runtime bounded control problem.<n>Self-healing achieves 98.8% task success, compared with 94.5% for retry-only and 93.8% for full replanning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-31T19:27:22Z)
• Beyond the Black Box: Interpretability of Agentic AI Tool Use [0.0]
  We introduce a mechanistic-interpretability toolkit built on Sparse Autoencoders and linear probes.<n>The framework reads model states before each action and infers both whether a tool is needed and how consequential the next tool action is likely to be.<n>We train the probes on multi-step trajectories from the NVIDIA Nemotron function-calling dataset and apply the same workflow to GPT-OSS 20B and Gemma 3 27B models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T19:47:30Z)
• Tool Attention Is All You Need: Dynamic Tool Gating and Lazy Schema Loading for Eliminating the MCP/Tools Tax in Scalable Agentic Workflows [2.2228811750157482]
  We introduce Tool Attention, a scalable-layer mechanism that generalizes the "Attention Is All You Need" paradigm.<n>We evaluate on a simulated 120-tool, six-server benchmark whose per-server token counts are calibrated to public audits of real MCP deployments.<n>Tool Attention directly reduces measured per-turn tool tokens by 95.0% (47.3k -> 2.4k) and raises effective context utilization (a token-ratio quantity) from 24% to 91%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-23T16:10:00Z)
• Dynamic analysis enhances issue resolution [53.50448142467294]
  DAIRA (Dynamic Analysis-enhanced Issue Resolution Agent) is an automated repair framework that embeds dynamic analysis into the agent's reasoning cycle.<n> Driven by a Test Tracing-Driven methodology, DAIRA utilizes lightweight monitors to extract critical runtime data.<n>When powered by Gemini 3 Flash Preview, DAIRA establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, achieving a 79.4% resolution rate on the SWE-bench Verified dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T14:48:54Z)
• CCTU: A Benchmark for Tool Use under Complex Constraints [66.87622847854337]
  We introduce CCTU, a benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) under complex constraints.<n>The benchmark comprises 200 carefully curated and challenging test cases across diverse tool-use scenarios.<n>We develop an executable constraint validation module that performs step-level validation and enforces compliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T14:05:13Z)
• Robust and Efficient Tool Orchestration via Layered Execution Structures with Reflective Correction [55.13278005189741]
  We model tool orchestration as learning a layered execution structure that captures high-level tool dependencies.<n>We introduce a schema-aware reflective correction mechanism that detects and repairs errors locally.<n>This design confines errors to individual tool calls and avoids re-planning entire execution trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-21T22:20:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.