Gaussian Mean Field Variational Inference can Overestimate Predictive Variance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.25745v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 12:15:23 GMT
• Title: Gaussian Mean Field Variational Inference can Overestimate Predictive Variance
• Abstract summary: Mean Field Variational Inference (MFVI) is widely understood to underestimate posterior variance.<n>We show that while MFVI underestimates the variance in parameter space, it can overestimate the predictive variance compared to the exact posterior.
• Score: 9.544146562919792
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Mean Field Variational Inference (MFVI) is widely understood to underestimate posterior variance. By analysing conjugate Bayesian Linear Regression (BLR), we show that this characterization is incomplete: while MFVI underestimates the variance in parameter space, it can overestimate the predictive variance compared to the exact posterior. We show that if the MFVI posterior underestimates predictive variances in some directions, it necessarily overestimates them in others. Crucially, this overestimation occurs in directions where the training data concentrates. This leads to the surprising result that, for a test point drawn from the training distribution, MFVI's expected predictive variance exceeds that of the exact posterior. We demonstrate a pathological case of this effect, where the MFVI posterior fails to reduce predictive variance compared to the prior on in distribution data. We connect these results to the Cold Posterior Effect, arguing that varying the temperature can correct this overestimation, yielding predictions closer to those of the exact posterior. We validate our theory on synthetic and real-world regression tasks.

Related papers

• Sample-Adaptive Latent Rewards for Uncertainty-Guided Diffusion Post-Training [51.18425726646089]
  We propose textscSURE, a unified latent-space framework for image and video diffusion models.<n>It learns reward distributions and directly uses their reliability to guide dense post-training.<n>textscSURE-REFL achieves the highest VBench quality, semantic, and total scores among the evaluated methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T14:55:42Z)
• Variational predictive resampling [2.756584457554517]
  We propose a scalable posterior sampling method that exploits VI's predictive strength within a predictive-resampling framework.<n>We show that VPR substantially improves posterior uncertainty quantification and recovers posterior dependence missed by MF-VI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T19:26:54Z)
• Diffusion-Based Posterior Sampling: A Feynman-Kac Analysis of Bias and Stability [13.640937605089865]
  Diffusion-based posterior samplers use pretrained diffusion priors to sample from measurement- or reward-conditioned posteriors.<n>This paper introduces a tractable surrogate path connecting the true posterior to a standard Gaussian and comparing it to the sampler's path.<n>A Feynman-Kac representation then expresses the Radon-Nikodym correction as an explicit path expectation, identifying which posterior regions are over- or under-sampled.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T16:37:29Z)
• Nearly Optimal Bayesian Inference for Structural Missingness [23.988531482641307]
  In the Bayesian view, prediction via the posterior predictive distribution integrates over the full model posterior uncertainty.<n>This framework decouples learning an in-model missing-value posterior from (ii) label prediction by optimizing the predictive posterior distribution.<n>It achieves SOTA on 43 classification and 15 imputation benchmarks, with finite-sample near Bayes-optimality guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T14:03:11Z)
• Causal vs. Anticausal merging of predictors [57.26526031579287]
  We study the differences arising from merging predictors in the causal and anticausal directions using the same data.<n>We use Causal Maximum Entropy (CMAXENT) as inductive bias to merge the predictors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T20:38:15Z)
• Risk and cross validation in ridge regression with correlated samples [72.59731158970894]
  We provide training examples for the in- and out-of-sample risks of ridge regression when the data points have arbitrary correlations.<n>We demonstrate that in this setting, the generalized cross validation estimator (GCV) fails to correctly predict the out-of-sample risk.<n>We further extend our analysis to the case where the test point has nontrivial correlations with the training set, a setting often encountered in time series forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T17:27:29Z)
• TIC-TAC: A Framework for Improved Covariance Estimation in Deep Heteroscedastic Regression [109.69084997173196]
  Deepscedastic regression involves jointly optimizing the mean and covariance of the predicted distribution using the negative log-likelihood. Recent works show that this may result in sub-optimal convergence due to the challenges associated with covariance estimation. We study two questions: (1) Does the predicted covariance truly capture the randomness of the predicted mean? Our results show that not only does TIC accurately learn the covariance, it additionally facilitates an improved convergence of the negative log-likelihood.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T09:54:03Z)
• Quantifying predictive uncertainty of aphasia severity in stroke patients with sparse heteroscedastic Bayesian high-dimensional regression [47.1405366895538]
  Sparse linear regression methods for high-dimensional data commonly assume that residuals have constant variance, which can be violated in practice. This paper proposes estimating high-dimensional heteroscedastic linear regression models using a heteroscedastic partitioned empirical Bayes Expectation Conditional Maximization algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T22:06:29Z)
• Variational Prediction [95.00085314353436]
  We present a technique for learning a variational approximation to the posterior predictive distribution using a variational bound. This approach can provide good predictive distributions without test time marginalization costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T18:19:31Z)
• On the detrimental effect of invariances in the likelihood for variational inference [21.912271882110986]
  Variational Bayesian posterior inference often requires simplifying approximations such as mean-field parametrisation to ensure tractability. Prior work has associated the variational mean-field approximation for Bayesian neural networks with underfitting in the case of small datasets or large model sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T09:13:30Z)
• SLOE: A Faster Method for Statistical Inference in High-Dimensional Logistic Regression [68.66245730450915]
  We develop an improved method for debiasing predictions and estimating frequentist uncertainty for practical datasets. Our main contribution is SLOE, an estimator of the signal strength with convergence guarantees that reduces the computation time of estimation and inference by orders of magnitude.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T17:48:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.