Enterprise Data Asset Quality: A Management-Standard Conformity-Benefit Realization Framework and Formation Mechanisms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26186v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 13:28:12 GMT
• Title: Enterprise Data Asset Quality: A Management-Standard Conformity-Benefit Realization Framework and Formation Mechanisms
• Abstract summary: This study develops a three-dimensional framework comprising Data Asset Management Capability, Data Quality Standard Conformity, and Data Asset Benefit Realization Capability.<n>This study integrates structural (PLS-SEM), necessary-condition (NCA), and configurational (fsQCA) analyses within a unified framework.
• Score: 2.9369738691612457
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Motivated by the limited standardization of enterprise data asset quality evaluation and the unclear relationship between assessment outcomes and value realization, this study develops a three-dimensional framework comprising Data Asset Management Capability, Data Quality Standard Conformity, and Data Asset Benefit Realization Capability, based on grounded theory and LDA topic modeling. To examine the formation mechanisms of data asset quality, this study adopts a multi-method approach combining PLS-SEM, Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA), and fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), to capture net effects, capability thresholds, and configurational paths. The results show that significant positive relationships exist among the three dimensions, with Data Asset Management Capability exerting the strongest effect on Data Quality Standard Conformity and further promoting Data Asset Benefit Realization Capability, forming a chain mechanism of management foundation-standard enhancement-value realization. In addition, all three dimensions constitute critical necessary conditions for achieving high data asset quality, and multiple equivalent configurational paths reflecting different combinations of Management, Standard, and Benefit are identified, such as governance-oriented and benefit-driven mechanisms. This study integrates structural (PLS-SEM), necessary-condition (NCA), and configurational (fsQCA) analyses within a unified framework, providing a systematic approach to understanding data asset quality formation and offering practical insights for enterprise data governance and data factor market development.

Related papers

• Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Modeling for Measurement and Network Analysis of the Data Service Market [50.00393065059756]
  This paper proposes a data service market measurement and network analysis method based on heterogeneous multi-agent modeling.<n>By introducing the service ecosystem theory, we clarify the participants and external factors of the data service market.<n>Furthermore, an analytical methodology is devised to precisely assess the influence of heterogeneous networks on utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T08:44:56Z)
• Data Science and Technology Towards AGI Part I: Tiered Data Management [53.64581824953229]
  We argue that the development of artificial intelligence is entering a new phase of data-model co-evolution.<n>We introduce an L0-L4 tiered data management framework, ranging from raw uncurated resources to organized and verifiable knowledge.<n>We validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework through empirical studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T18:47:51Z)
• The LLM Data Auditor: A Metric-oriented Survey on Quality and Trustworthiness in Evaluating Synthetic Data [25.926467401802046]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for generating data across various modalities.<n>We propose a framework for evaluating synthetic data from two dimensions: quality and trustworthiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T06:40:25Z)
• A Framework for Data Valuation and Monetisation [0.0]
  This paper introduces a unified valuation framework that integrates economic, governance, and strategic perspectives into a coherent decision-support model.<n>The model combines qualitative scoring, cost- and utility-based estimation, relevance/quality indexing, and multi-criteria weighting to define data value transparently and systematically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T15:57:26Z)
• An Evaluation Framework for Network IDS/IPS Datasets: Leveraging MITRE ATT&CK and Industry Relevance Metrics [1.6006586061577803]
  Current AI model evaluation practices for developing IDS/IPS focus predominantly on accuracy metrics.<n>We introduce a novel multi-dimensional framework that integrates the MITRE ATT&CK knowledge base for threat intelligence.<n>Applying this framework to nine publicly available IDS/IPS datasets reveals significant gaps in threat coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-16T19:17:00Z)
• OmniQuality-R: Advancing Reward Models Through All-Encompassing Quality Assessment [55.59322229889159]
  We propose OmniQuality-R, a unified reward modeling framework that transforms multi-task quality reasoning into continuous and interpretable reward signals.<n>We use a reasoning-enhanced reward modeling dataset to form a reliable chain-of-thought dataset for supervised fine-tuning.<n>We evaluate OmniQuality-R on three key IQA tasks: aesthetic quality assessment, technical quality evaluation, and text-image alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-12T13:46:28Z)
• Data Quality Taxonomy for Data Monetization [0.0]
  This chapter presents a comprehensive taxonomy for assessing data quality in the context of data monetisation.<n>The framework's interconnected "metrics layer" ensures improvements in one dimension cascade into others, maximising strategic impact.<n>This holistic approach bridges the gap between granular technical assessment and high-level decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T12:42:02Z)
• A Theoretical Framework for AI-driven data quality monitoring in high-volume data environments [1.2753215270475886]
  This paper presents a theoretical framework for an AI-driven data quality monitoring system designed to address the challenges of maintaining data quality in high-volume environments. We examine the limitations of traditional methods in managing the scale, velocity, and variety of big data and propose a conceptual approach leveraging advanced machine learning techniques. Key components include an intelligent data ingestion layer, adaptive preprocessing mechanisms, context-aware feature extraction, and AI-based quality assessment modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T07:06:36Z)
• Enhancing Data Quality in Federated Fine-Tuning of Foundation Models [54.757324343062734]
  We propose a data quality control pipeline for federated fine-tuning of foundation models. This pipeline computes scores reflecting the quality of training data and determines a global threshold for a unified standard. Our experiments show that the proposed quality control pipeline facilitates the effectiveness and reliability of the model training, leading to better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T14:28:04Z)
• Causal Feature Selection for Algorithmic Fairness [61.767399505764736]
  We consider fairness in the integration component of data management. We propose an approach to identify a sub-collection of features that ensure the fairness of the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T20:20:10Z)
• Decomposed Adversarial Learned Inference [118.27187231452852]
  We propose a novel approach, Decomposed Adversarial Learned Inference (DALI) DALI explicitly matches prior and conditional distributions in both data and code spaces. We validate the effectiveness of DALI on the MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CelebA datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T20:00:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.