Agentic Analysis for Agentic Infrastructure: An LLM-Powered Pipeline for Comparative Governance of DAO and Corporate AI Protocols

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26203v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 16:34:54 GMT
• Title: Agentic Analysis for Agentic Infrastructure: An LLM-Powered Pipeline for Comparative Governance of DAO and Corporate AI Protocols
• Abstract summary: We introduce an LLM-powered comparative pipeline for large-scale governance discourse analysis.<n>We validate it on two contrasting standards for agent interoperability: ERC-8004 (permissionless, on-chain) and Google A2A (corporate-led)<n>We find that while governance form influences substantive focus, both regimes exhibit comparable levels of participation inequality and community fragmentation.
• Score: 5.209373486278134
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As AI agent protocols proliferate, the governance structures shaping their interoperability standards remain empirically underexamined. We introduce an LLM-powered comparative pipeline for large-scale governance discourse analysis, integrating automated annotation, neural topic modeling, and multi-layer network analysis to study socio-technical power structures at scale. We validate it on two contrasting standards for agent interoperability: ERC-8004 (permissionless, on-chain) and Google A2A (corporate-led). Analyzing 4,323 governance participation records, we combine LLM-assisted coding, topic modeling, and multi-layer network analysis to examine how institutional design shapes thematic priorities and community structure. We find that while governance form influences substantive focus, both regimes exhibit comparable levels of participation inequality and community fragmentation. Discourse alignment is denser in the permissionless setting, suggesting that open governance may foster greater thematic convergence despite decentralized participation. These findings illustrate how LLM-assisted methods can advance the empirical study of technology governance, with implications for designing more equitable agentic AI standards. All data and code are openly available.

Related papers

• Agentic AI and Retrieval-Augmented Models in Straight-Through Underwriting [7.670757733138505]
  Actuaries now face a design space that ranges from traditional rule-based automation to large language models.<n>This paper examines how these emerging architectures can support actuarial priorities such as transparency, auditability, and human-in-the-loop governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T18:43:34Z)
• Position: agentic AI orchestration should be Bayes-consistent [92.04373485710285]
  This paper argues that coherent decision-making requires Bayesian principles at the orchestration level of the agentic system.<n>It provides examples and design patterns to illustrate how beliefs and utility-aware policies can improve agentic AI orchestration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-01T15:43:43Z)
• Beyond the Academic Monoculture: A Unified Framework and Industrial Perspective for Attributed Graph Clustering [75.50670592447219]
  Attributed Graph Clustering (AGC) is a fundamental unsupervised task that partitions nodes into cohesive groups by jointly modeling structural topology and node attributes.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive, industrially grounded review of AGC from three complementary perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-21T14:15:34Z)
• Reasoning-Driven Multimodal LLM for Domain Generalization [72.00754603114187]
  We study the role of reasoning in domain generalization using DomainBed-Reasoning dataset.<n>We propose RD-MLDG, a framework with two components: MTCT (Multi-Task Cross-Training) and SARR (Self-Aligned Reasoning Regularization)<n>Experiments on standard DomainBed datasets demonstrate that RD-MLDG achieves complementary state-of-the-art performances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T08:10:06Z)
• From Prompt-Response to Goal-Directed Systems: The Evolution of Agentic AI Software Architecture [0.0]
  Agentic AI denotes an architectural transition from stateless, prompt-driven generative models toward goal-directed systems.<n>This paper examines this transition by connecting intelligent agent theories, with contemporary LLM-centric approaches.<n>The study identifies a convergence toward standardized agent loops, registries, and auditable control mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T03:34:48Z)
• Doc2AHP: Inferring Structured Multi-Criteria Decision Models via Semantic Trees with LLMs [7.026862437055361]
  We propose Doc2AHP, a novel structured inference framework guided by AHP principles.<n>We introduce a multi-agent weighting mechanism coupled with an adaptive consistency optimization strategy to ensure the numerical consistency of weight allocation.<n> Empirical results demonstrate that Doc2AHP not only empowers non-expert users to construct high-quality decision models from scratch but also significantly outperforms direct generative baselines in both logical completeness and downstream task accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T06:20:23Z)
• DAO-AI: Evaluating Collective Decision-Making through Agentic AI in Decentralized Governance [7.230919380272301]
  This paper presents a first empirical study of agentic AI as autonomous decision-makers in decentralized governance.<n>We build an agentic AI voter that interprets proposal contexts, retrieves historical deliberation data, and independently determines its voting position.<n>The study contributes to the design of explainable and economically rigorous AI agents for decentralized financial systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T03:13:14Z)
• Agentic AI Reasoning for Mobile Edge General Intelligence: Fundamentals, Approaches, and Directions [74.35421055079655]
  Large language models (LLMs) have enabled an emergence of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) with powerful reasoning and autonomous decision-making capabilities.<n>Mobile Edge General Intelligence (MEGI) brings real-time, privacy-preserving reasoning to the network edge.<n>We propose a joint optimization framework for efficient LLM reasoning deployment in MEGI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T10:53:48Z)
• From Firms to Computation: AI Governance and the Evolution of Institutions [0.0]
  This article synthesizes three frameworks: multi-level selection theory, Aoki's view of firms as computational processes, and Ostrom's design principles for robust institutions.<n>We develop a framework where selection operates concurrently across organizational levels, firms implement distributed inference via game-theoretic architectures, and Ostrom-style rules evolve as alignment mechanisms that address AI-related risks.<n>We conclude by proposing a set of design principles that operationalize alignment between humans and AI across institutional layers, enabling scalable, adaptive, and inclusive governance of agential AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-18T02:52:58Z)
• A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems.<n>We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.