Accelerating Skill Assessment in Chess: A Drift-Diffusion-Enhanced Elo Rating System

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26267v1
• Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 18:08:45 GMT
• Title: Accelerating Skill Assessment in Chess: A Drift-Diffusion-Enhanced Elo Rating System
• Abstract summary: We propose the Drift-Diffusion-Enhanced Elo Rating System (DD-Elo) as a novel skill assessment framework.<n>By modeling skill expression as a decision-making process, our model integrates move-level data to capture rapid skill fluctuations.<n>Our findings suggest DD-Elo offers an explainable, highly responsive, and backward-compatible solution for chess rating ecosystems.
• Score: 0.5161531917413708
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Rating systems such as Elo serve as the gold standard for matchmaking in competitive chess. However, they inherently suffer from response lag due to their exclusive reliance on match outcomes, neglecting the granular quality of gameplay. Nevertheless, incorporating move-by-move information into rating adjustments presents a significant challenge given the substantial noise and the vastness of the game-state space. To address this, we propose the Drift-Diffusion-Enhanced Elo Rating System (DD-Elo), a novel skill assessment framework inspired by the drift diffusion model (DDM) from cognitive neuroscience. By modeling skill expression as a decision-making process, our model integrates move-level data to capture rapid skill fluctuations. We provide a rigorous mathematical derivation proving that DD-Elo maintains a bounded deviation from the traditional Elo system, ensuring theoretical alignment. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DD-Elo adapts to skill changes faster than Elo. Our findings suggest that DD-Elo offers an explainable, highly responsive, and backward-compatible solution for chess rating ecosystems. The implementation code is publicly available at https://github.com/Aquila-zhou1/DD-Elo .

Related papers

• DriftScope: Measuring The Hidden Effects of Diffusion Model Adaptation [50.584834483403675]
  Adapting pre-trained text-to-image diffusion models, whether to learn new visual concepts or erase unwanted ones, is routinely evaluated on its intended effects alone.<n>We demonstrate that adaptation systematically damages semantically unrelated concepts in ways that aggregate metrics structurally cannot surface.<n>We introduce DriftScope, a prompt-level diagnostic tool that takes any two model checkpoints and returns a ranked list of tokens whose visual concepts have shifted most between them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-30T20:57:51Z)
• Score-Driven Rating System for Sports [0.0]
  This paper introduces a score-driven rating system, a generalization of the classical Elo rating system.<n>The proposed framework accommodates a wide range of game results, such as point differences, win/draw/loss outcomes, or complete rankings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-10T09:22:33Z)
• Dual-Stage Reweighted MoE for Long-Tailed Egocentric Mistake Detection [85.0189917888094]
  We propose a Dual-Stage Reweighted Mixture-of-Experts (DR-MoE) framework to handle the challenges posed by subtle and infrequent mistakes.<n>The proposed method achieves strong performance, particularly in identifying rare and ambiguous mistake instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T12:00:42Z)
• Who is a Better Player: LLM against LLM [53.46608216197315]
  We propose an adversarial benchmarking framework to assess the comprehensive performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) through board games competition.<n>We introduce Qi Town, a specialized evaluation platform that supports 5 widely played games and involves 20 LLM-driven players.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T06:41:47Z)
• Re-evaluating Open-ended Evaluation of Large Language Models [50.23008729038318]
  We show that the current Elo-based rating systems can be susceptible to and even reinforce biases in data, intentional or accidental.<n>We propose evaluation as a 3-player game, and introduce novel game-theoretic solution concepts to ensure robustness to redundancy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T15:07:47Z)
• Is Elo Rating Reliable? A Study Under Model Misspecification [18.36167187657728]
  We show that most games deviate significantly from the assumptions of the Bradley-Terry model, raising questions on the reliability of Elo.<n>Despite these deviations, Elo frequently outperforms more complex rating systems.<n>We observe a strong correlation between Elo's predictive accuracy and its ranking performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T04:07:33Z)
• Methods for Generating Drift in Text Streams [49.3179290313959]
  Concept drift is a frequent phenomenon in real-world datasets and corresponds to changes in data distribution over time. This paper provides four textual drift generation methods to ease the production of datasets with labeled drifts. Results show that all methods have their performance degraded right after the drifts, and the incremental SVM is the fastest to run and recover the previous performance levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T23:48:33Z)
• Object Detection Difficulty: Suppressing Over-aggregation for Faster and Better Video Object Detection [19.96470463506838]
  Video object detection (VOD) models often encounter issues with over-aggregation due to redundant aggregation strategies. We propose an image-level Object Detection Difficulty (ODD) metric to quantify the difficulty of detecting objects in a given image. The derived ODD scores can be used in the VOD process to mitigate over-aggregation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T09:59:35Z)
• Refined Response Distillation for Class-Incremental Player Detection [29.764766170176905]
  Existing methods assume fixed player categories, incapably accommodating the real-world scenarios where categories continue to evolve. Inspired by recent research on incremental object detection (IOD), we propose a Refined Response Distillation (R2D) method to effectively mitigate catastrophic forgetting for IOD tasks of the players. We present the NBA-IOD and Volleyball-IOD datasets as the benchmark and investigate the IOD tasks of the players systematically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-01T01:49:48Z)
• Consistent Diffusion Models: Mitigating Sampling Drift by Learning to be Consistent [97.64313409741614]
  We propose to enforce a emphconsistency property which states that predictions of the model on its own generated data are consistent across time. We show that our novel training objective yields state-of-the-art results for conditional and unconditional generation in CIFAR-10 and baseline improvements in AFHQ and FFHQ.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-17T18:45:04Z)
• Learning to Identify Top Elo Ratings: A Dueling Bandits Approach [27.495132915328025]
  We propose an efficient online match scheduling algorithm to improve the sample efficiency of the Elo evaluation (for top players) Specifically, we identify and match the top players through a dueling bandits framework and tailor the bandit algorithm to the gradient-based update of Elo. Our algorithm has a regret guarantee $tildeO(sqrtT)$, sublinear in the number of competition rounds and has been extended to the multidimensional Elo ratings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-12T13:57:29Z)
• AQD: Towards Accurate Fully-Quantized Object Detection [94.06347866374927]
  We propose an Accurate Quantized object Detection solution, termed AQD, to get rid of floating-point computation. Our AQD achieves comparable or even better performance compared with the full-precision counterpart under extremely low-bit schemes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T09:07:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.