Fortress and Gatekeeper: Theorizing Transitive Trust in Third-Party Cybersecurity Risk Governance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26866v1
• Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 10:52:48 GMT
• Title: Fortress and Gatekeeper: Theorizing Transitive Trust in Third-Party Cybersecurity Risk Governance
• Abstract summary: Third-party vendors are increasingly embedded in digital service delivery.<n>Third-party cybersecurity risk is both a trust relationship and a delegation problem.<n>The paper argues that third-party cybersecurity risk is both a trust relationship and a delegation problem.
• Score: 3.116057885259112
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Third-party vendors, such as analytics platforms, cloud services, identity providers, and software suppliers, are increasingly embedded in digital service delivery. While these arrangements enable scale and specialization, they also move customer data and security-relevant practices into environments that customers rarely see, select, or evaluate. This paper examines this problem through a document analysis of the November 2025 OpenAI-Mixpanel security incident. The incident serves as an illustrative case for showing how a security event in a vendor environment can become a governance and accountability problem for the focal organization that maintains the customer relationship. Drawing on organizational trust research and agency theory, the paper argues that third-party cybersecurity risk is both a trust relationship and a delegation problem. Customers trust the visible service provider, while the provider relies on vendors whose security practices are only partially visible and controllable. The paper develops the concept of transitive trust, where customer trust in a digital service depends on the security practices of vendors authorized by that service provider. It then presents the Fortress and Gatekeeper framework, which explains cybersecurity governance boundaries through trust and data flows rather than formal organizational ownership alone. The analysis develops four propositions concerning vendor integration, metadata exposure, vendor assurance, and data proliferation. The paper contributes to cybersecurity governance scholarship by explaining how delegated data processing creates customer-facing accountability and by identifying implications for vendor tiering, data classification, contractual design, continuous assurance, and data minimization.

Related papers

• Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security [57.35851886874902]
  Agentic AI systems execute complex tasks autonomously, but their multi-step trajectories introduce new failure modes that challenge trustworthiness.<n>This survey provides a focused examination of trustworthy agentic AI through two core dimensions that are critical for high-risk deployments.<n>For each dimension, we clarify key concepts, identify where risks emerge along the agent workflow, and summarize stage-targeted mitigation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T10:26:37Z)
• FERA: Uncertainty-Aware Federated Reasoning for Large Language Models [60.52562148874846]
  We study federated reasoning, where a server improves multi-step reasoning by coordinating with heterogeneous clients holding private demonstrations.<n>The key challenge is that client reliability is query-dependent, while the server cannot inspect client data to determine which contributions are trustworthy.<n>We propose Uncertainty-Aware Federated Reasoning (FERA), a training-free framework based on iterative server-client co-refinement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T07:04:51Z)
• Aegis: Towards Governance, Integrity, and Security of AI Voice Agents [52.7512082818639]
  We propose Aegis, a framework for the governance, integrity, and security of voice agents.<n>We evaluate the framework through case studies in banking call centers, IT Support, and logistics.<n>We observe systematic differences across model families, with open-weight models exhibiting higher susceptibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-07T05:51:36Z)
• Frontier AI Auditing: Toward Rigorous Third-Party Assessment of Safety and Security Practices at Leading AI Companies [57.521647436515785]
  We define frontier AI auditing as rigorous third-party verification of frontier AI developers' safety and security claims.<n>We introduce AI Assurance Levels (AAL-1 to AAL-4), ranging from time-bounded system audits to continuous, deception-resilient verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T18:44:09Z)
• Data Protection and Corporate Reputation Management in the Digital Era [0.0]
  This paper analyzes the relationship between cybersecurity management, data protection, and corporate reputation in the context of digital transformation.<n>The study examines how organizations implement strategies and tools to mitigate cyber risks, comply with regulatory requirements, and maintain stakeholder trust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-16T10:51:17Z)
• Towards Trustworthy GUI Agents: A Survey [64.6445117343499]
  This survey examines the trustworthiness of GUI agents in five critical dimensions.<n>We identify major challenges such as vulnerability to adversarial attacks, cascading failure modes in sequential decision-making.<n>As GUI agents become more widespread, establishing robust safety standards and responsible development practices is essential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T13:26:00Z)
• SoK: A cloudy view on trust relationships of CVMs -- How Confidential Virtual Machines are falling short in Public Cloud [1.7040315536962174]
  Confidential computing in the public cloud aims to safeguard workload privacy while outsourcing infrastructure management to a cloud provider.<n>This SoK critically examines the confidential computing offerings of market-leading cloud providers to assess whether they genuinely adhere to its core principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T10:21:29Z)
• Blockchain-Enhanced Framework for Secure Third-Party Vendor Risk Management and Vigilant Security Controls [0.6990493129893112]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive secure framework for managing third-party vendor risk. It integrates blockchain technology to ensure transparency, traceability, and immutability in vendor assessments and interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T16:42:14Z)
• Secure and Confidential Certificates of Online Fairness [8.681039636447865]
  Confidentiality is critical for delivering ML services legally and responsibly.<n>Existing methods that assess model fairness confidentially lack either (i) reliability because they certify fairness with respect to a static set of data.<n>We present OATH, a deployably efficient and scalable zero-knowledge proof protocol for confidential online group fairness certification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T16:00:35Z)
• Incentivizing Secure Software Development: The Role of Liability (Waiver) and Audit [13.971996404435172]
  Recently proposed U.S. National Cybersecurity Strategy shifts responsibility for cyber incidents back to software vendors. In doing so, the strategy also puts forward the concept of the liability waiver. We show that the optimal strategy for an opt-in vendor is to never quit; and exert cumulative investments in either "one-and-done" or "incremental" manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T16:27:30Z)
• Auditing and Generating Synthetic Data with Controllable Trust Trade-offs [54.262044436203965]
  We introduce a holistic auditing framework that comprehensively evaluates synthetic datasets and AI models. It focuses on preventing bias and discrimination, ensures fidelity to the source data, assesses utility, robustness, and privacy preservation. We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness by auditing various generative models across diverse use cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T09:03:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.