Delayed Verification Destabilizes Multi-Agent LLM Belief: Instability Thresholds and Optimal Corrector Placement

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27409v1
• Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 10:52:54 GMT
• Title: Delayed Verification Destabilizes Multi-Agent LLM Belief: Instability Thresholds and Optimal Corrector Placement
• Abstract summary: Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems often rely on verifier and critic agents to suppress hallucinations.<n>During this delay, false claims can propagate through the agent network.<n>We model this process as delayed consensus on a graph with grounded corrector nodes.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems often rely on verifier and critic agents to suppress hallucinations, but verification is delayed. During this delay, false claims can propagate through the agent network. We model this process as delayed consensus on a graph with grounded corrector nodes. Spectral decomposition by the grounded Laplacian yields a closed-form stability threshold for the verification dose: correction that is too strong or too delayed can turn consensus into oscillation. The most unstable regime occurs when the communication and verification delays coincide; for delay two, the threshold is the inverse golden ratio. The same framework gives a supermodular placement objective and a greedy (1-1/e)-approximation rule for assigning a limited corrector budget to influential nodes. Experiments across five open models confirm the predicted dose-delay oscillations. By contrast, grounded factual answering makes truth an absorbing boundary and eliminates the effect, suggesting that the instability is specific to signed-belief tasks while grounded verification remains stabilizing

Related papers

• A Decision-Support Audit Protocol for Supervision Drift in Proxy-Labeled Credit-Risk Prediction [2.0804785116579425]
  Credit-risk models are trained on proxy labels but no single metric separates base-rate shift, probability-scale shift, and feature-label relationship change.<n>We contribute a design-science artifact: a locked, multi-signal audit protocol for supervision drift in proxy-labeled credit-risk prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-14T17:20:35Z)
• Actionable Hallucination Detection: Translating Latent Uncertainty into Agentic Critique [1.1172382217477128]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) deployed as AI agents frequently exhibit user specification-grounding failures.<n>Existing detection methods fail to provide actionable, real-time correction as they either do not localize the hallucinations, or incur prohibitive inference latency.<n>We introduce the Latent Critic, a lightweight low-rank adapter (LoRA) that operates concurrently with a frozen base LLM's generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T03:26:16Z)
• ExComm: Exploration-Stage Communication for Error-Resilient Agentic Test-Time Scaling [57.42714978834704]
  ExComm is a communication protocol for exploration-stage agentic test-time scaling.<n>We show that ExComm consistently outperforms strong test-time scaling baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-21T07:38:44Z)
• VerifyMAS: Hypothesis Verification for Failure Attribution in LLM Multi-Agent Systems [79.51005192758262]
  Large language model-driven multi-agent systems excel at complex tasks.<n>However, unreliable agents remain a key bottleneck to system-level reliability.<n>We propose a hypothesis verification framework for agent failure attribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T14:09:35Z)
• Correct Answers from Sound Reasoning: Verifiable Process Supervision for Language Models [94.68358825189738]
  We propose a post-training framework for verifiable domains that jointly optimize prediction accuracy and reasoning quality.<n>We evaluate VPS on chess, a controlled testbed where reasoning steps can be deterministically verified against engine signals.<n>VPS preserves accuracy while significantly improving reasoning quality, reducing win-rate error by up to 30% and restoring consistency to near saturation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T15:19:46Z)
• When Fusion Helps and When It Breaks: View-Aligned Robustness in Same-Source Financial Imaging [4.857561672498819]
  We study same-source multi-view learning and adversarial robustness for next-day direction prediction with financial image representations.<n>We construct two window-aligned views from each rolling window: an OHLCV-rendered price/volume chart and a technical-indicator matrix.<n>We evaluate test-time L-infinity perturbations using FGSM and PGD under two threat scenarios: view-constrained attacks that perturb one view and joint attacks that perturb both.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T16:45:23Z)
• Information Fidelity in Tool-Using LLM Agents: A Martingale Analysis of the Model Context Protocol [69.11739400975445]
  We introduce the first theoretical framework for analyzing error accumulation in Model Context Protocol (MCP) agents.<n>We show that cumulative distortion exhibits linear growth and high-probability deviations bounded by $O(sqrtT)$.<n>Key findings include: semantic weighting reduces distortion by 80%, and periodic re-grounding approximately every 9 steps suffices for error control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T21:08:53Z)
• "I May Not Have Articulated Myself Clearly": Diagnosing Dynamic Instability in LLM Reasoning at Inference Time [1.570719611178015]
  Reasoning failures in large language models (LLMs) are typically measured only at the end of a generation, yet many failures manifest as a process-level breakdown.<n>We define a simple instability signal that combines consecutive-step distributional shift (JSD) and uncertainty (entropy)<n>Across GSM8K and HotpotQA, instability strength predicts wrong answers with above-chance AUC and yields monotonic bucket-level accuracy decline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T22:11:25Z)
• Preventing the Collapse of Peer Review Requires Verification-First AI [49.995126139461085]
  We propose truth-coupling, i.e. how tightly venue scores track latent scientific truth.<n>We formalize two forces that drive a phase transition toward proxy-sovereign evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T17:17:32Z)
• Catching Contamination Before Generation: Spectral Kill Switches for Agents [0.0]
  We introduce a diagnostic that uses only the forward pass to emit a binary accept or reject signal during agent execution.<n>The method analyzes token graphs induced by attention and computes two spectral statistics in early layers.<n>We show that a single threshold on the high frequency energy ratio is optimal in the Bayes sense for detecting context inconsistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-08T02:24:05Z)
• Don't Let It Fade: Preserving Edits in Diffusion Language Models via Token Timestep Allocation [9.670831676453673]
  We describe update forgetting, in which uniform and context updates induce token level fluctuations across timesteps.<n>We propose Token Timestep Allocation (TTA), which realizes soft and semantic token ordering via per token timestep schedules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T07:21:05Z)
• Multi-Agent Collaborative Intelligence: Dual-Dial Control for Reliable LLM Reasoning [0.0]
  MACI is an active controller with two independent dials that decouple information from behavior.<n>A moderator tracks disagreement, overlap, evidence quality, and argument quality, and halts when gains plateau.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T04:52:17Z)
• Stochastic Approximation with Delayed Updates: Finite-Time Rates under Markovian Sampling [73.5602474095954]
  We study the non-asymptotic performance of approximation schemes with delayed updates under Markovian sampling. Our theoretical findings shed light on the finite-time effects of delays for a broad class of algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T03:08:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.