ToE: A Hierarchical and Explainable Claim Verification Framework with Dynamic Multi-source Evidence Retrieval and Aggregation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.27736v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 05:35:27 GMT
• Title: ToE: A Hierarchical and Explainable Claim Verification Framework with Dynamic Multi-source Evidence Retrieval and Aggregation
• Abstract summary: ToE is a hierarchical evidence reasoning framework for automated fact-checking.<n>ToE integrates a reinforcement learning-driven multi-source retrieval agent, an evidence evaluation agent, and an argument tree aggregation algorithm.<n>We show that ToE achieves improvements ranging from 4 to 24 percentage points over competitive baselines.
• Score: 23.934630478971517
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid spread of fake news poses increasing threats to information ecosystems, especially as AI-generated misinformation under Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) poisoning allows adversarially crafted content to be systematically surfaced by retrieval systems, contaminating LLM reasoning. In this paper, we propose Tree of Evidence (ToE), a hierarchical evidence reasoning framework for automated fact-checking that models each claim as a dynamically expanding argument tree. ToE integrates a reinforcement learning-driven multi-source retrieval agent, an evidence evaluation agent, and an argument tree aggregation algorithm to iteratively decompose, retrieve, and verify claims through an explainable evidence chain. We further provide a theoretical analysis of the retrieval process, deriving a formal error bound that guarantees the learned policy converges to a neighborhood of the information-theoretically optimal policy. Experiments across multiple datasets and backbone LLMs demonstrate that ToE achieves improvements ranging from 4 to 24 percentage points over competitive baselines, with particularly pronounced gains on adversarially poisoned inputs.

Related papers

• Cross-platform epistemic verification for improving factual reliability in AI-generated news summarization [0.0]
  This study proposes Multi-source Evidence Consen- sus Verification (MECV) for AI-generated news summariza- tion.<n>Instead of depending on a single retrieval channel, MECV aggregates evidence from multiple heterogeneous sources, including the source document, Wikipedia, and open-web retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T18:01:24Z)
• HiEviDR-Bench: A Benchmark for Hierarchical Evidence Aggregation in Deep Research [52.87128503345243]
  We introduce HiEviDR-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating Hierarchical Evidence Aggregation in Deep Research.<n>HiEviDR-Bench represents each instance with an explicit evidence graph that captures evidence selection, cross-source linking, and aggregation.<n>We develop a traceability-oriented evaluation framework with five dimensions: report quality, evidence traceability, citation accuracy, claim verification, and answer correctness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-27T23:50:46Z)
• DeepRefine: Agent-Compiled Knowledge Refinement via Reinforcement Learning [60.35032268606525]
  Agent-compiled knowledge bases provide persistent external knowledge for large language model (LLM) agents in downstream tasks.<n>Yet their quality is systematically limited by emphincompleteness, emphincorrectness, and emphredundancy
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T12:48:31Z)
• Multi-Sourced, Multi-Agent Evidence Retrieval for Fact-Checking [47.47518672198846]
  Misinformation spreading over the Internet poses a significant threat to both societies and individuals.<n>Previous methods rely on semantic and social-contextual patterns learned from training data.<n>We propose WKGFC, which exploits authorized open knowledge graph as a core resource of evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T19:29:01Z)
• How Much Reasoning Do Retrieval-Augmented Models Add beyond LLMs? A Benchmarking Framework for Multi-Hop Inference over Hybrid Knowledge [26.8497597881469]
  HybridRAG-Bench is a framework for constructing benchmarks to evaluate retrieval-intensive, multi-hop reasoning over hybrid knowledge.<n>We show that HybridRAG-Bench rewards genuine retrieval and reasoning rather than parametric recall, offering a principled testbed for evaluating hybrid knowledge-augmented reasoning systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T19:04:01Z)
• ExDR: Explanation-driven Dynamic Retrieval Enhancement for Multimodal Fake News Detection [23.87220484843729]
  multimodal fake news poses a serious societal threat.<n> Dynamic Retrieval-Augmented Generation provides a promising solution by triggering keyword-based retrieval.<n>We propose ExDR, an Explanation-driven Dynamic Retrieval-Augmented Generation framework for Multimodal Fake News Detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T10:10:06Z)
• Multi-hop Reasoning via Early Knowledge Alignment [68.28168992785896]
  Early Knowledge Alignment (EKA) aims to align Large Language Models with contextually relevant retrieved knowledge.<n>EKA significantly improves retrieval precision, reduces cascading errors, and enhances both performance and efficiency.<n>EKA proves effective as a versatile, training-free inference strategy that scales seamlessly to large models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T08:14:44Z)
• VAR: Visual Attention Reasoning via Structured Search and Backtracking [49.427842994857635]
  We introduce Visual Attention Reasoning, a framework that recasts grounded reasoning as a structured search.<n> VAR decomposes the reasoning process into two key stages: traceable evidence grounding and search-based chain-of-thought.<n>We show that our 7B model, VAR-7B, sets a new state-of-the-art on a comprehensive suite of hallucination and safety benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T13:18:44Z)
• From Evidence to Trajectory: Abductive Reasoning Path Synthesis for Training Retrieval-Augmented Generation Agents [47.06655345033574]
  We propose EviPath, an evidence-anchored reasoning path synthesis paradigm for RAG agent development.<n>EviPath comprises: (i) Abductive Subtask Planning, which decomposes the problem into sub-questions and iteratively plans an optimal solution path based on the dependencies between them; (ii) Faithful Sub-question Answering, which uses supporting evidence to construct a proxy environment to generate reasoning thoughts and answers for each sub-question; and (iii) Conversational Fine-Tuning, which formats the complete agent-environment interaction trajectory into a dialogue format suitable for Supervised Fine-Tuning
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T02:53:09Z)
• WebWeaver: Structuring Web-Scale Evidence with Dynamic Outlines for Open-Ended Deep Research [73.58638285105971]
  This paper tackles textbfopen-ended deep research (OEDR), a complex challenge where AI agents must synthesize vast web-scale information into insightful reports.<n>We introduce textbfWebWeaver, a novel dual-agent framework that emulates the human research process.<n>Our framework establishes a new state-of-the-art across major OEDR benchmarks, including DeepResearch Bench, DeepConsult, and DeepResearchGym.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T17:57:21Z)
• Retrieval-Augmented Generation by Evidence Retroactivity in LLMs [19.122314663040726]
  Retroactive Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RetroRAG) is a novel framework to build a retroactive reasoning paradigm.<n>RetroRAG revises and updates the evidence, redirecting the reasoning chain to the correct direction.<n> Empirical evaluations show that RetroRAG significantly outperforms existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T08:57:42Z)
• GIVE: Structured Reasoning of Large Language Models with Knowledge Graph Inspired Veracity Extrapolation [108.2008975785364]
  Graph Inspired Veracity Extrapolation (GIVE) is a novel reasoning method that merges parametric and non-parametric memories to improve accurate reasoning with minimal external input.<n>GIVE guides the LLM agent to select the most pertinent expert data (observe), engage in query-specific divergent thinking (reflect), and then synthesize this information to produce the final output (speak)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T03:05:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.