From Detection to Action: Using LLM Agents for Fault-Tolerant Control
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28011v1
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 12:13:58 GMT
- Title: From Detection to Action: Using LLM Agents for Fault-Tolerant Control
- Abstract summary: We propose an agentic Large Language Model (LLM) framework for Fault-Tolerant Control (FTC)<n>It transforms fault detection outputs into constraint-aware recovery actions grounded in plant-specific knowledge.<n>We show that semantically grounded agents can derive valid recovery decisions within latency budgets compatible with the respective process dynamics.
- Score: 0.21313236831585222
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We propose an agentic Large Language Model (LLM) framework for active Fault-Tolerant Control (FTC) that transforms fault detection outputs into constraint-aware recovery actions grounded in plant-specific knowledge. The approach couples (i) a multi-agent workflow that decomposes operator duties into monitoring, planning, action synthesis, simulation, validation, and reprompting; (ii) a Digital Process Plant Twin (DPPT) that exposes plant data, models, and a simulation service for pre-execution testing; and (iii) a Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Graph RAG) layer built on the CPSMod ontology, which organizes plant knowledge (structure, function, hybrid dynamics, control context, and fault semantics) into a graph that supports relation-aware, multi-hop retrieval for the agents. Corrective actions are generated as minimal-risk state-machine recovery paths and corresponding discrete commands or continuous setpoint adaptations, then validated deterministically against interlocks, envelopes, and dynamic feasibility before any actuation. If no acceptable plan is found within a bounded time window, control is handed to a safety fallback. The framework is evaluated in simulation on two representative benchmarks: a discrete batch Mixing Module and a Continuous Stirred-Tank Reactor (CSTR) under closed-loop PID regulation. Results with lightweight LLMs (GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4.1-mini) show that semantically grounded agents can derive valid recovery decisions within latency budgets compatible with the respective process dynamics, demonstrating a practical pathway from detection to validated corrective action across both discrete and continuous FTC tasks.
Related papers
- From Sequence to Structure: Relational Uncertainty Propagation for LLM Agents [75.69180947909148]
We propose a trajectory-level UQ framework for large language model (LLM) agents.<n>RuPA represents an execution history as a directed trajectory graph in which reasoning states, tool interactions, and environment feedback are nodes connected by temporal and semantic dependency edges.<n>We evaluate RUPA on representative agent benchmarks, including $$-2, Terminal-Bench-2, and GAIA, using 6 open-source LLMs spanning multiple model families.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-17T01:40:14Z) - PhyAgentOS: A Self-Evolving Operating System for Embodied Agents with Decoupled Cognitive Planning and Physical Execution [49.776611937968]
We present PhyAgentOS, a foundation delivering scheduling, verification, memory, benchmarking, and safety as system-level services.<n>Its Session-Centered treats a session, not an action, as the minimum unit of scheduling, compatibility, supervised execution, evidence collection, and acceptance.<n>SessionVerifier distinguishes execution termination from semantic task completion via evidence-grounded verdicts of success, failure, or replan.<n> Benchmarking reuses the deployment session and verification path, so results trace to real execution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-18T04:46:53Z) - Dynamic analysis enhances issue resolution [53.50448142467294]
DAIRA (Dynamic Analysis-enhanced Issue Resolution Agent) is an automated repair framework that embeds dynamic analysis into the agent's reasoning cycle.<n> Driven by a Test Tracing-Driven methodology, DAIRA utilizes lightweight monitors to extract critical runtime data.<n>When powered by Gemini 3 Flash Preview, DAIRA establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, achieving a 79.4% resolution rate on the SWE-bench Verified dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T14:48:54Z) - Guided Verifier: Collaborative Multimodal Reasoning via Dynamic Process Supervision [11.159231524113764]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a pivotal mechanism for enhancing the complex reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>In this paper, we propose the textbfGuided Verifier framework to address these structural limitations.<n>We develop a specialized data synthesis pipeline targeting multimodal hallucinations, constructing textbfCoRe dataset of process-level negatives and textbfCorrect-guide textbfReasoning trajectories to train the guided verifier.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T07:38:42Z) - TriCEGAR: A Trace-Driven Abstraction Mechanism for Agentic AI [5.1181001367075]
TriCEGAR is a trace-driven abstraction mechanism that automates state construction from execution logs.<n>We describe a framework-native implementation that captures typed agent lifecycle events and builds abstractions from traces.<n>We also show how run likelihoods enable anomaly detection as a guardrailing signal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T14:01:47Z) - The Bitter Lesson of Diffusion Language Models for Agentic Workflows: A Comprehensive Reality Check [54.08619694620588]
We present a comprehensive evaluation of dLLMs across two distinct agentic paradigms: Embodied Agents and Tool-Calling Agents.<n>Our results on Agentboard and BFCL reveal a "bitter lesson": current dLLMs fail to serve as reliable agentic backbones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-19T11:45:39Z) - Metacognitive Self-Correction for Multi-Agent System via Prototype-Guided Next-Execution Reconstruction [58.51530390018909]
Large Language Model based multi-agent systems excel at collaborative problem solving but remain brittle to cascading errors.<n>We present MASC, a metacognitive framework that endows MAS with real-time, unsupervised, step-level error detection and self-correction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T05:35:37Z) - Automatic Building Code Review: A Case Study [6.530899637501737]
Building officials face labor-intensive, error-prone, and costly manual reviews of design documents as projects increase in size and complexity.<n>This study introduces a novel agent-driven framework that integrates BIM-based data extraction with automated verification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-03T00:30:14Z) - Autonomous Control Leveraging LLMs: An Agentic Framework for Next-Generation Industrial Automation [0.0]
We introduce a unified agentic framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) for both discrete fault-recovery planning and continuous process control.<n>Our results demonstrate that, with structured feedback and modular agents, LLMs can unify high-level symbolic planningand low-level continuous control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-03T11:20:22Z) - Leveraging LLM Agents and Digital Twins for Fault Handling in Process Plants [0.6990493129893112]
We propose a framework that integrates Large Language Model (LLM) agents with a Digital Twin environment.<n>The Digital Twin acts as a structured repository of plant-specific engineering knowledge for agent prompting.<n>The proposed framework is capable not only of autonomously controlling the mixing module, but also of generating effective corrective actions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-04T12:02:21Z) - Code-as-Monitor: Constraint-aware Visual Programming for Reactive and Proactive Robotic Failure Detection [56.66677293607114]
We propose Code-as-Monitor (CaM) for both open-set reactive and proactive failure detection.<n>To enhance the accuracy and efficiency of monitoring, we introduce constraint elements that abstract constraint-related entities.<n>Experiments show that CaM achieves a 28.7% higher success rate and reduces execution time by 31.8% under severe disturbances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-05T18:58:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.