AirGroundBench: Probing Spatial Intelligence in Multimodal Large Models under Heterogeneous Multi-View Embodied Collaboration
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28049v1
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 12:51:22 GMT
- Title: AirGroundBench: Probing Spatial Intelligence in Multimodal Large Models under Heterogeneous Multi-View Embodied Collaboration
- Abstract summary: We present AirGroundBench, a diagnostic benchmark for evaluating multi-view spatial intelligence in UAV-UGV collaboration.<n>AirGroundBench is built from 11 high-fidelity simulated environments with 1,021 synchronized air-ground observation pairs.<n>It covers 10 task types organized into four progressively demanding capability dimensions.
- Score: 22.635145889984273
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In recent years, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for embodied intelligence, yet their ability to maintain geometrically consistent spatial understanding across heterogeneous views remains under-evaluated. Existing benchmarks largely focus on single-agent, single-view perception, leaving a gap in the systematic assessment of collaborative air-ground settings, where multi-scale observations are complementary but introduce scale mismatch, asymmetric occlusion, and reference-frame inconsistencies. We present AirGroundBench, a diagnostic benchmark for evaluating multi-view spatial intelligence in heterogeneous UAV-UGV collaboration. AirGroundBench is built from 11 high-fidelity simulated environments with 1,021 synchronized air-ground observation pairs, yielding approximately 62,000 dual-view, four-option single-choice visual question answering instances and 115 closed-loop vision-language navigation episodes. It covers 10 task types organized into four progressively demanding capability dimensions: spatial perception, cross-view alignment, spatial transformation and reasoning, and embodied decision-making. To support geometry-grounded evaluation and analysis, we provide structured spatial annotations, including cross-view object identities and metric 2D and 3D bounding boxes. Evaluations of 13 representative MLLMs under UAV-only, UGV-only, and dual-view input settings reveal consistent bottlenecks: models perform relatively well on spatial perception but struggle with cross-view alignment and transformation-intensive reasoning, and these deficits propagate to sequential decision-making in vision-language navigation. Although dual-view inputs provide measurable gains over single-view variants, a persistent gap from human performance remains, highlighting geometric consistency as a key limitation of current embodied MLLMs.
Related papers
- MultiView-Bench: A Diagnostic Benchmark for World-Centric Multi-View Integration in VLMs [40.317798580235]
Recent benchmarks for VLMs largely assess single- or limited-view perception, leaving untested the core cognitive ability to integrate observations across viewpoints into a coherent, world-centric (allocentric) 3D mental model.<n>We introduce MultiView-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark expressly designed to evaluate multi-view integration for holistic 3D scene comprehension.<n>We propose ViewNavigator, a multi-agent framework that actively selects informative viewpoints, perceives, and fuses multi-view evidence, improving diverse base models on MultiView-Bench even under a strict budget-matched comparison.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-09T22:22:42Z) - IDEAL-Bench: Indoor Dataset and Evaluation suite for Analyzing 3D Layout reasoning [30.654858163397662]
We introduce I-Bench, an evaluation suite that requires Vision-Language Models to predict structured 3D layouts on indoor scenes.<n>I-Bench moves beyond CLEVR-style simple geometric primitives so that any image-space discrepancy reflects spatial reasoning alone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-03T22:04:42Z) - Embodied3DBench: Benchmarking Low-Level Embodied Spatial Intelligence of Vision Language Models [50.6415287154632]
Embodied3DBench is a robot-centric benchmark targeting low-level spatial intelligence in 3D environments.<n>The benchmark spans 12 subcategories and contains over 21k high-quality question-answer pairs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-27T20:28:56Z) - Are VLMs Lost Between Sky and Space? LinkS$^2$Bench for UAV-Satellite Dynamic Cross-View Spatial Intelligence [107.79496500634691]
LinkS$2$Bench links 1,022 minutes of dynamic UAV footage with high-resolution satellite imagery covering over 200 km$2$.<n>Through an LMM-assisted pipeline and rigorous human annotation, we constructed 17.9k high-quality question-answer pairs.<n> Evaluations reveal a substantial gap compared to human baselines, identifying accurate cross-view dynamic alignment as the critical bottleneck.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-02T13:22:57Z) - VIEW2SPACE: Studying Multi-View Visual Reasoning from Sparse Observations [47.94531550391802]
Multi-view visual reasoning is essential for intelligent systems that must understand complex environments from sparse and discrete viewpoints.<n>In real-world scenarios, reasoning across views requires integrating partial observations without explicit guidance.<n>We leverage physically grounded simulation to construct diverse, high-fidelity 3D scenes with precise per-view metadata.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T13:36:30Z) - Perception-Aware Multimodal Spatial Reasoning from Monocular Images [57.42071289037214]
spatial reasoning from monocular images is essential for autonomous driving.<n>Current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) still struggle with fine-grained geometric perception.<n>We propose a perception-aware multimodal reasoning framework that equipsVLMs with explicit object-centric grounding ability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-07T02:05:12Z) - SpatialViz-Bench: An MLLM Benchmark for Spatial Visualization [44.427830927596204]
SpatialViz-Bench is a comprehensive benchmark for spatial visualization with 12 tasks across 4 sub-abilities, comprising 1,180 automatically generated problems.<n>Our evaluation of 33 state-of-the-art MLLMs reveals wide performance variations and uncovers counter-intuitive findings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-10T10:27:20Z) - InternSpatial: A Comprehensive Dataset for Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [59.7084864920244]
InternSpatial is the largest open-source dataset for spatial reasoning in vision-language models (VLMs)<n> InternSpatial comprises 12 million QA pairs spanning both single-view and multi-view settings.<n> InternSpatial-Bench is a corresponding evaluation benchmark designed to assess spatial understanding under diverse instruction formats.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-23T08:17:22Z) - ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models [68.46716645478661]
Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding and reasoning about visual content.<n>Current VLMs excel primarily at egocentric spatial reasoning (from the camera's perspective) but fail to generalize to allocentric viewpoints.<n>We introduce ViewSpatial-Bench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed specifically for multi-viewpoint spatial localization recognition evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T17:59:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.