Managing the Human Fallback: Skill Investment Under Improving AI and Worker Mobility

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.29111v1
• Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2026 23:34:23 GMT
• Title: Managing the Human Fallback: Skill Investment Under Improving AI and Worker Mobility
• Abstract summary: We show that when firms deploy autonomous AI, they must decide how much work to leave to the system and how much to keep workers engaged.<n>We develop a parsimonious two-period model in which AI may outperform the worker when it functions, but may fail with positive probability.<n>A firm chooses worker engagement; engagement lowers current output for below-benchmark workers, but changes future skill through learning and erosion.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: When firms deploy autonomous AI, they must decide how much work to leave to the system and how much to keep workers engaged. This decision affects current output and future human capital. We develop a parsimonious two-period model in which AI may outperform the worker when it functions, but may fail with positive probability. A firm chooses worker engagement; engagement lowers current output for below-benchmark workers, but changes future skill through learning and erosion. We distinguish two dimensions of AI progress: capability, the system's output when it works, and reliability, the probability that it works. In a single-firm benchmark, engagement is valuable only as fallback investment. The firm engages the least-skilled workers most, because they have the largest skill gaps and are least costly to bring toward a useful fallback level. With worker mobility, engagement also affects labor-market sorting: workers prefer jobs that build more valuable skill trajectories. This sorting motive targets higher-skill workers near the AI frontier, where skill gains are more valuable and engagement is less costly. Mobility can therefore reverse the engagement pattern, shifting investment from the least-skilled toward the most-skilled workers below the AI benchmark. Mobility also reshapes how AI progress affects engagement: greater capability raises engagement by increasing the value of the skill trajectory a firm offers, whereas greater reliability can raise or lower it because it reduces fallback need while also changing learning opportunities. Under worker mobility, human-AI work design becomes a problem of human-capital investment, in which allocating work today shapes future skill.

Related papers

• When Does AI Augment Work? A Workflow-Level Framework for Human-Agent Collaboration [78.16115745870405]
  We aim to characterise the value of artificial intelligence in the workplace.<n>Current studies largely measure this value in terms of the current automation capabilities and public adoption of AI.<n>To account for this, we must expand the scope of our analysis beyond atomised tasks of today.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-11T06:29:34Z)
• The Boundaries of Automation: A Theory of Persistent Human Participation [107.84677954791773]
  We argue that human participation may persist even with highly capable AI systems.<n>In some activities, the target is not fully specified in advance but instead emerges through the interaction itself.<n>This perspective has important implications for the limits of automation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T17:33:43Z)
• SkillGen: Verified Inference-Time Agent Skill Synthesis [60.927977774369516]
  SkillGen is a framework that synthesizes a single auditable skill from trajectories generated by a base agent.<n>It identifies reusable success patterns, recurring failure modes, and behaviors that appear in nearby successes but are missing from failures.<n>A key novelty in SkillGen is that we model agent skills as interventions to empirically verify the net effect of skills on the overall performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T19:24:11Z)
• Short-Term Gain, Long-Term Fragility: AI Labor Substitution and the Erosion of Sustainable Capability [0.0]
  This paper develops a mechanism of capability masking and capability erosion under AI labor substitution.<n> AI-generated output can create the appearance that organizational capability has been replaced, even when dependence on skilled human labor remains.<n>Evidence from AI-assisted coding shows that generated output still requires substantial human verification and remains uneven in correctness, maintainability, and security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-23T03:11:27Z)
• The Augmentation Trap: AI Productivity and the Cost of Cognitive Offloading [0.0]
  Experimental evidence confirms that AI tools raise worker productivity, but that sustained use can erode the expertise on which those gains depend.<n>We develop a dynamic model in which a decision-maker chooses AI usage intensity for a worker over time.<n>We decompose the tool's productivity effect into two channels, one independent of worker expertise and one that scales with it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T22:50:32Z)
• AI Skills Improve Job Prospects: Causal Evidence from a Hiring Experiment [0.15293427903448023]
  This study examines whether AI skills serve as a positive hiring signal and whether they can offset conventional disadvantages such as older age or lower formal education.<n>We conduct an experimental survey with 1,700 recruiters from the United Kingdom and the United States.<n>Across three occupations, AI skills significantly increase interview invitation probabilities by approximately 8 to 15 percentage points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T18:37:28Z)
• Training for Obsolescence? The AI-Driven Education Trap [0.0]
  We model an educational planner whose decision to adopt AI is driven by its teaching productivity, failing to internalize AI's future wage-suppressing effect on those same skills.<n>Our findings caution that policies promoting AI in education, if not paired with forward-looking labor market signals, may paradoxically undermine students' long-term human capital.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T07:04:19Z)
• SIME: Enhancing Policy Self-Improvement with Modal-level Exploration [49.86173021151849]
  We identify the key to successful self-improvement: modal-level exploration and data selection.<n>By incorporating a modal-level exploration mechanism during policy execution, the robot can produce more diverse and multi-modal interactions.<n>We successfully demonstrate effective robot self-improvement on both simulation benchmarks and real-world experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T17:13:03Z)
• Superintelligence Strategy: Expert Version [64.7113737051525]
  Destabilizing AI developments could raise the odds of great-power conflict.<n>Superintelligence -- AI vastly better than humans at nearly all cognitive tasks -- is now anticipated by AI researchers.<n>We introduce the concept of Mutual Assured AI Malfunction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T17:53:24Z)
• How Performance Pressure Influences AI-Assisted Decision Making [52.997197698288936]
  We show how pressure and explainable AI (XAI) techniques interact with AI advice-taking behavior.<n>Our results show complex interaction effects, with different combinations of pressure and XAI techniques either improving or worsening AI advice taking behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T22:39:52Z)
• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences.<n>First, it is not sustainable, as, despite efficiency improvements, its compute demands increase faster than model performance.<n>Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• AI and Jobs: Has the Inflection Point Arrived? Evidence from an Online Labor Platform [0.13124513975412255]
  We investigate how AI influences freelancers across different online labor markets (OLMs) To shed light on the underlying mechanisms, we developed a Cournot-type competition model. We find that U.S. web developers tend to benefit more from the release of ChatGPT compared to their counterparts in other regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T10:06:34Z)
• Artificial intelligence and the skill premium [0.0]
  We develop a nested constant elasticity of substitution production function that distinguishes between industrial robots and AI. We show that AI reduces the skill premium as long as it is more substitutable for high-skill workers than low-skill workers are for high-skill workers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T20:16:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.