Are Humans Evolved Instruction Followers? An Underlying Inductive Bias Enables Rapid Instructed Task Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.29792v1
• Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 05:12:03 GMT
• Title: Are Humans Evolved Instruction Followers? An Underlying Inductive Bias Enables Rapid Instructed Task Learning
• Abstract summary: Human adults can often perform a novel task correctly on the first attempt after only receiving verbal or written instructions.<n>We argue that humans possess an evolved instruction-following bias -- an inductive bias shaped by evolution to interpret and execute linguistic instructions.
• Score: 0.04512372501420208
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Human adults can often perform a novel task correctly on the first attempt after only receiving verbal or written instructions. This rapid instructed task learning (RITL) is a hallmark of human cognitive flexibility, yet its mechanisms and parallels in artificial systems remain under-explored across disciplines. In this position paper, we argue that humans possess an evolved instruction-following bias -- an inductive bias shaped by evolution to interpret and execute linguistic instructions which critically enables fast generalization of behavior from language. This bias functions analogously to the way large language models (LLMs) leverage instruction tuning to achieve zero-shot task performance. We synthesize evidence from cognitive science, neuroscience, and machine learning research to support this hypothesis. While instruction-following in AI is currently achieved via specialized training protocols, we posit that in humans it arises as an innate cognitive architecture feature. We outline testable predictions and call for more interdisciplinary research to investigate Instruction-Following as a unifying mechanism enabling rapid task learning in both natural and artificial neural networks.

Related papers

• Agentivism: a learning theory for the age of artificial intelligence [2.278981812218892]
  Generative and agentic AI create a new condition by allowing learners to delegate cognitive work to systems that can generate, recommend, and sometimes act on the learner's behalf.<n>This creates a fundamental challenge for learning theory: successful performance can no longer be assumed to indicate learning.<n>We propose Agentivism, a learning theory for human-AI interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T05:09:48Z)
• Consistent Zero-Shot Imitation with Contrastive Goal Inference [30.726311787096435]
  A prerequisite for embodied agents deployed in real world interactions ought to be training with interaction.<n>Key contribution of our paper is a method for pre-training interactive agents in a self-supervised fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T00:28:03Z)
• Behavioral Exploration: Learning to Explore via In-Context Adaptation [53.92981562916783]
  We train a long-context generative model to predict expert actions conditioned on a context of past observations and a measure of how exploratory'' the expert's behaviors are relative to this context.<n>This enables the model to not only mimic the behavior of an expert, but also, by feeding its past history of interactions into its context, to select different expert behaviors than what have been previously selected.<n>We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in both simulated locomotion and manipulation settings, as well as on real-world robotic manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T21:36:19Z)
• Situated Instruction Following [87.37244711380411]
  We propose situated instruction following, which embraces the inherent underspecification and ambiguity of real-world communication. The meaning of situated instructions naturally unfold through the past actions and the expected future behaviors of the human involved. Our experiments indicate that state-of-the-art Embodied Instruction Following (EIF) models lack holistic understanding of situated human intention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T19:32:30Z)
• Interpretable Robotic Manipulation from Language [11.207620790833271]
  We introduce an explainable behavior cloning agent, named Ex-PERACT, specifically designed for manipulation tasks. At the top level, the model is tasked with learning a discrete skill code, while at the bottom level, the policy network translates the problem into a voxelized grid and maps the discretized actions to voxel grids. We evaluate our method across eight challenging manipulation tasks utilizing the RLBench benchmark, demonstrating that Ex-PERACT not only achieves competitive policy performance but also effectively bridges the gap between human instructions and machine execution in complex environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T11:02:21Z)
• An Incomplete Loop: Deductive, Inductive, and Abductive Learning in Large Language Models [99.31449616860291]
  Modern language models (LMs) can learn to perform new tasks in different ways. In instruction following, the target task is described explicitly in natural language; in few-shot prompting, the task is specified implicitly. In instruction inference, LMs are presented with in-context examples and are then prompted to generate a natural language task description.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T19:31:56Z)
• The dynamic interplay between in-context and in-weight learning in humans and neural networks [16.43008975197273]
  We show that "in-context learning" (ICL) can equip neural networks with fundamentally different learning properties that can coexist with their native IWL.<n>Our work shows how emergent ICL can equip neural networks with fundamentally different learning properties that can coexist with their native IWL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T18:55:27Z)
• Incremental procedural and sensorimotor learning in cognitive humanoid robots [52.77024349608834]
  This work presents a cognitive agent that can learn procedures incrementally. We show the cognitive functions required in each substage and how adding new functions helps address tasks previously unsolved by the agent. Results show that this approach is capable of solving complex tasks incrementally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-30T22:51:31Z)
• Define, Evaluate, and Improve Task-Oriented Cognitive Capabilities for Instruction Generation Models [5.975913042883176]
  Recent work studies the cognitive capabilities of language models through psychological tests designed for humans. We formulate task-oriented cognitive capabilities, which are human-like cognitive capabilities that language models leverage to perform tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T04:43:19Z)
• NeuroCERIL: Robotic Imitation Learning via Hierarchical Cause-Effect Reasoning in Programmable Attractor Neural Networks [2.0646127669654826]
  We present NeuroCERIL, a brain-inspired neurocognitive architecture that uses a novel hypothetico-deductive reasoning procedure. We show that NeuroCERIL can learn various procedural skills in a simulated robotic imitation learning domain. We conclude that NeuroCERIL is a viable neural model of human-like imitation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T19:56:11Z)
• Using Natural Language and Program Abstractions to Instill Human Inductive Biases in Machines [27.79626958016208]
  We show that agents trained by meta-learning may acquire very different strategies from humans. We show that co-training these agents on predicting representations from natural language task descriptions and from programs induced to generate such tasks guides them toward human-like inductive biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T18:17:58Z)
• Learning Theory of Mind via Dynamic Traits Attribution [59.9781556714202]
  We propose a new neural ToM architecture that learns to generate a latent trait vector of an actor from the past trajectories. This trait vector then multiplicatively modulates the prediction mechanism via a fast weights' scheme in the prediction neural network. We empirically show that the fast weights provide a good inductive bias to model the character traits of agents and hence improves mindreading ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T11:21:18Z)
• Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognition [108.89281493851358]
  A fascinating hypothesis is that human and animal intelligence could be explained by a few principles. This work considers a larger list, focusing on those which concern mostly higher-level and sequential conscious processing. The objective of clarifying these particular principles is that they could potentially help us build AI systems benefiting from humans' abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-30T18:29:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.