SABER-Math: Automated Benchmark for Information Retrieval Evaluation in Mathematics
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.29894v1
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 07:32:50 GMT
- Title: SABER-Math: Automated Benchmark for Information Retrieval Evaluation in Mathematics
- Abstract summary: We introduce SABER-Math, the first fully automated benchmark for evaluating mathematical IR without expert annotation.<n>Starting from 283K high-school-level math problems with solutions, SABER-Math builds challenging reranking tasks in three steps.<n>We evaluate lexical retrievers, specialized mathematical retrieval systems, and recent embedding models.
- Score: 4.685475117723465
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: As agentic AI systems tackle more complex mathematical tasks, they increasingly rely on information retrieval (IR) to search problem databases, theorem libraries, and educational resources. However, choosing the right retriever remains difficult, as it is infeasible to directly isolate its effect on downstream performance. On the other hand, existing retrieval-specific benchmarks often fail to capture fine-grained mathematical relevance, penalizing relevant documents. We address this gap by introducing SABER-Math, the first fully automated benchmark for evaluating mathematical IR without expert annotation. Starting from 283K high-school-level math problems with solutions, SABER-Math builds challenging reranking tasks in three steps: (i) first, LLMs extract concise solution summaries and mathematical topics for each problem; (ii) then, per-query relevant documents are discovered using ontology topic-based and lexical solutions-summary-based similarities, and (iii) finally, a Swiss-style LLM preference tournament produces fine-grained relevance ratings for the documents. We evaluate lexical retrievers, specialized mathematical retrieval systems, and recent embedding models. We find that while modern embedding models substantially outperform classical and math-specific baselines, even the strongest systems struggle in symbol-heavy domains like Algebra and Calculus. Importantly, we show that general-purpose IR benchmarks such as MTEB do not reliably predict mathematical performance, especially for recent embedding models, highlighting the need for math-specific retrieval benchmarks.
Related papers
- Math-Vision Diagrams: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Mathematical Diagram Generation Capabilities [0.0]
We introduce Math-Vision Diagrams, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We select a subset of 2920 images out of 3040 from high-quality competition problems with essential visual context.<n>All code, data, curation pipeline, and evaluation scripts will be fully open-sourced.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-09T23:58:01Z) - MathCoPilot: An Interactive System for Human-AI Symbiotic Paradigm of Mathematical Research [62.221184989046826]
MathCoPilot is a human-in-the-loop system that embodies a new human--AI symbiotic paradigm for mathematical research.<n>MathCoPilot unifies three core capabilities: an interactive proof blueprint that decomposes a proof into navigable steps the human can directly inspect, direct, and refine; automated proving skill orchestration with adaptive knowledge base search and Lean-integrated iterative verification; and topic-driven paper retrieval and automated formalization into a verified Lean knowledge base.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-16T05:22:40Z) - From Solvers to Research: Large Language Model-Driven Formal Mathematics at the Research Frontier [109.93387172162984]
We argue that the next leap in AI4Math systems requires a decisive shift from predefined problem-solvers to research agents.<n>We provide a systematic review of the field, covering datasets, auto-formalization, and proof synthesis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-08T17:46:36Z) - Reasoning over mathematical objects: on-policy reward modeling and test time aggregation [120.92237765735813]
We build and release training data and benchmarks for deriving mathematical objects, the Principia suite.<n>We show how on-policy training can also be used to scale test-time compute via aggregation.<n>We find that strong LMs such as Qwen3-235B and o3 struggle on Principia, while our training recipes can bring significant improvements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-19T13:27:12Z) - LemmaBench: A Live, Research-Level Benchmark to Evaluate LLM Capabilities in Mathematics [5.676144562388248]
We present a new approach for benchmarking Large Language Model capabilities on research-level mathematics.<n>Existing benchmarks largely rely on static, hand-curated sets of contest or textbook-style problems as proxies for mathematical research.<n>Instead, we establish an updatable benchmark evaluating models directly on the latest research results in mathematics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T16:52:52Z) - RealMath: A Continuous Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Research-Level Mathematics [30.778394290919582]
Existing benchmarks for evaluating mathematical reasoning in large language models (LLMs) rely primarily on competition problems, formal proofs, or artificially challenging questions.<n>We introduce RealMath, a novel benchmark derived directly from research papers and mathematical forums that assesses LLMs' abilities on authentic mathematical tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-18T23:32:46Z) - Challenging the Boundaries of Reasoning: An Olympiad-Level Math Benchmark for Large Language Models [86.45058529521258]
OlymMATH is a novel Olympiad-level mathematical benchmark designed to rigorously test the complex reasoning capabilities of LLMs.<n>OlymMATH features 200 meticulously curated problems, each manually verified and available in parallel English and Chinese versions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T11:20:17Z) - MathFimer: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning by Expanding Reasoning Steps through Fill-in-the-Middle Task [47.98592958615677]
We introduce MathFimer, a novel framework for mathematical reasoning step expansion.<n>We develop a specialized model, MathFimer-7B, on our carefully curated NuminaMath-FIM dataset.<n>We then apply these models to enhance existing mathematical reasoning datasets by inserting detailed intermediate steps into their solution chains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T11:22:24Z) - HARDMath: A Benchmark Dataset for Challenging Problems in Applied Mathematics [1.5716764919736026]
We introduce HARDMath, a dataset featuring challenging applied mathematics problems that require analytical approximation techniques.<n>Our framework auto-generates a large number of problems with solutions validated against numerical ground truths.<n>We evaluate both open- and closed-source LLMs on HARDMath-mini, a sub-sampled test set of 366 problems, as well as on 40 word problems formulated in applied science contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-13T20:09:41Z) - MathHay: An Automated Benchmark for Long-Context Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs [61.74749961334557]
MathHay is an automated benchmark designed to assess the long-context mathematical reasoning capabilities of LLMs.
We conduct extensive experiments on MathHay to assess the long-context mathematical reasoning abilities of eight top-performing models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T02:30:07Z) - GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solvers [68.77382332826167]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance across various mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
One essential and frequently occurring evidence is that when the math questions are slightly changed, LLMs can behave incorrectly.
This motivates us to evaluate the robustness of LLMs' math reasoning capability by testing a wide range of question variations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-29T15:26:14Z) - JiuZhang: A Chinese Pre-trained Language Model for Mathematical Problem
Understanding [74.12405417718054]
This paper aims to advance the mathematical intelligence of machines by presenting the first Chinese mathematical pre-trained language model(PLM)
Unlike other standard NLP tasks, mathematical texts are difficult to understand, since they involve mathematical terminology, symbols and formulas in the problem statement.
We design a novel curriculum pre-training approach for improving the learning of mathematical PLMs, consisting of both basic and advanced courses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-13T17:03:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.