Anthropomorphism in AI Companion Communities: Age, Gender, and Emotional Correlates

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30942v1
• Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 21:51:53 GMT
• Title: Anthropomorphism in AI Companion Communities: Age, Gender, and Emotional Correlates
• Abstract summary: Humanlike AI qualities and user predispositions to anthropomorphize relate to social consequences.<n>Populations such as children, older adults, or those with mental health vulnerabilities may be particularly susceptible to anthropomorphism.<n>We used publicly available Reddit data from three popular AI companion subreddits to assess relationships between gender, age, anthropomorphism, and elicited emotions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly integrated into daily life, with millions now using AI chatbots built on Large Language Models (LLMs) for companionship. Both humanlike AI qualities and user predispositions to anthropomorphize relate to social consequences, such as increased trust, social health benefits, and psychological harms. Populations such as children, older adults, or those with mental health vulnerabilities may be particularly susceptible to anthropomorphism and its detriments, but mixed findings complicate the role of demographics. We used publicly available Reddit data from three popular AI companion subreddits to assess relationships between gender, age, anthropomorphism, and elicited emotions, to better understand how different people perceive and are affected by AI companions. We investigated three questions: How do age and gender relate to anthropomorphization of AI?, How does emotional expression relate to anthropomorphization?, and How do age and gender moderate emotion-anthropomorphization relationships? We found that adults and women anthropomorphize AI chatbots more than teens and men, and that positive emotional expression, particularly joy, is positively associated with anthropomorphization, while neutrality is negatively associated with anthropomorphism. Both relationships were stronger in adults than teens. Our findings suggest that the tendency to anthropomorphize may be more broadly distributed across age groups than previously expected, thereby prompting the reevaluation of existing digital safety norms.

Related papers

• "Always Want to Use it for Everything": Understanding Young Adults' Perceptions of AI Dependence [9.22654434898775]
  We collected testimonials from young adults aged 18 to 25 through an online questionnaire.<n>We identified three contributing factors of AI dependence: chronic use, efficiency, and delegation.<n>We argue that preventing lasting harm to young adults' development is paramount.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-05T20:50:29Z)
• A Longitudinal Randomized Control Study of Companion Chatbot Use: Anthropomorphism and Its Mediating Role on Social Impacts [0.061386715480643554]
  Concerns that companion chatbots may harm or replace real human relationships have been raised.<n>This study examined the impact of human-AI interaction on human-human social outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T19:33:41Z)
• "I Am the One and Only, Your Cyber BFF": Understanding the Impact of GenAI Requires Understanding the Impact of Anthropomorphic AI [55.99010491370177]
  We argue that we cannot thoroughly map the social impacts of generative AI without mapping the social impacts of anthropomorphic AI. anthropomorphic AI systems are increasingly prone to generating outputs that are perceived to be human-like.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T04:57:41Z)
• From Pixels to Personas: Investigating and Modeling Self-Anthropomorphism in Human-Robot Dialogues [29.549159419088294]
  Self-anthropomorphism in robots manifests itself through their display of human-like characteristics in dialogue, such as expressing preferences and emotions. We show significant differences in these two types of responses and propose transitioning from one type to the other. We introduce Pix2Persona, a novel dataset aimed at developing ethical and engaging AI systems in various embodiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T19:06:24Z)
• Human Bias in the Face of AI: Examining Human Judgment Against Text Labeled as AI Generated [48.70176791365903]
  This study explores how bias shapes the perception of AI versus human generated content.<n>We investigated how human raters respond to labeled and unlabeled content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T04:31:45Z)
• Measuring Human Contribution in AI-Assisted Content Generation [66.06040950325969]
  This study raises the research question of measuring human contribution in AI-assisted content generation.<n>By calculating mutual information between human input and AI-assisted output relative to self-information of AI-assisted output, we quantify the proportional information contribution of humans in content generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T05:56:04Z)
• From "AI" to Probabilistic Automation: How Does Anthropomorphization of Technical Systems Descriptions Influence Trust? [10.608535718084926]
  This paper investigates the influence of anthropomorphized descriptions of so-called "AI" (artificial intelligence) systems on people's self-assessment of trust in the system. We find that participants are no more likely to trust anthropomorphized over de-anthropomorphized product descriptions overall.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T17:01:09Z)
• Socratis: Are large multimodal models emotionally aware? [63.912414283486555]
  Existing emotion prediction benchmarks do not consider the diversity of emotions that an image and text can elicit in humans due to various reasons. We propose Socratis, a societal reactions benchmark, where each image-caption (IC) pair is annotated with multiple emotions and the reasons for feeling them. We benchmark the capability of state-of-the-art multimodal large language models to generate the reasons for feeling an emotion given an IC pair.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T13:59:35Z)
• Anthropomorphization of AI: Opportunities and Risks [24.137106159123892]
  Anthropomorphization is the tendency to attribute human-like traits to non-human entities. With widespread adoption of AI systems, the tendency for users to anthropomorphize it increases significantly. We study the objective legal implications, as analyzed through the lens of the recent blueprint of AI bill of rights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T06:39:45Z)
• Data-driven emotional body language generation for social robotics [58.88028813371423]
  In social robotics, endowing humanoid robots with the ability to generate bodily expressions of affect can improve human-robot interaction and collaboration. We implement a deep learning data-driven framework that learns from a few hand-designed robotic bodily expressions. The evaluation study found that the anthropomorphism and animacy of the generated expressions are not perceived differently from the hand-designed ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-02T09:21:39Z)
• Revealing Persona Biases in Dialogue Systems [64.96908171646808]
  We present the first large-scale study on persona biases in dialogue systems. We conduct analyses on personas of different social classes, sexual orientations, races, and genders. In our studies of the Blender and DialoGPT dialogue systems, we show that the choice of personas can affect the degree of harms in generated responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T05:44:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.