Partially ordering software licenses

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31032v1
• Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 02:03:21 GMT
• Title: Partially ordering software licenses
• Abstract summary: Licenses are legal instruments that inventors use to protect the technologies they build and regulate how they are used.<n>The nature of their authorship and selection means that how they are interpreted, chosen, and enforced is largely unstructured.
• Score: 1.4901285771725858
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Licenses are legal instruments that inventors may use to protect the technologies they build and regulate how they are used -- however, the nature of their authorship and selection means that how they are interpreted, chosen, and enforced is largely unstructured. In practice, this makes it difficult to compare licenses at scale -- when is one license considered more permissive than the other, and when are their terms incomparable to each other? Currently, there is a growing list of licenses that are introduced and used, but there is no systematic way to study their relationships. This matters for platforms such as Hugging Face, GitHub, and the Python Package Index, where developers publish or build upon technologies that each have their own licenses. Using large language models (LLMs), we introduce methods for comparing licenses at scale: first, in a pairwise fashion to construct a partial ordering based on permissiveness, and second, by drawing on existing taxonomies of software licenses. The former allows us to trace restrictiveness, and the latter allows us to understand license selection as a combination of shared provisions. Our analysis recovers certain interpretable attributes that correspond to stricter licenses, with legal implications for the open-source ecosystem.

Related papers

• The Prevalence and Impact of Licenses in Open Software Projects [11.111309839462814]
  We identify licenses and license types for over 100M software projects.<n>Permissive licenses represent an increasing proportion of all licenses over time.<n>C-language ecosystems show reduced activity while Python shows increased activity when comparing restrictive to permissive license transition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-22T15:01:02Z)
• Citation-Closure Retrieval and Per-Rule Attribution for Real-World Regulatory Compliance Question Answering [54.97384993676565]
  We formalize Regulatory Compliance QA with RegOps-Bench, a novel benchmark featuring an Operational Knowledge Graph derived from complex national R&D regulations.<n>RefWalk traverses cross-document citations, fuses multi-view candidates via max-based aggregation, and enforces per-rule attribution to explicitly map claims to sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T10:38:38Z)
• "They've Stolen My GPL-Licensed Model!": Toward Standardized and Transparent Model Licensing [30.19362102481241]
  We develop a new vocabulary for ML workflow management and encoded license rules to enable ontological reasoning for analyzing rights granting and compliance issues.<n>Our analysis tool is built on Turtle language and Notation3 reasoning engine, envisioned as first step toward Linked Open Model Data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T06:52:09Z)
• On the Standardization of Behavioral Use Clauses and Their Adoption for Responsible Licensing of AI [27.748532981456464]
  In 2018, licenses with behaviorial-use clauses were proposed to give developers a framework for releasing AI assets. As of the end of 2023, on the order of 40,000 software and model repositories have adopted responsible AI licenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T22:29:42Z)
• Instructional Fingerprinting of Large Language Models [57.72356846657551]
  We present a pilot study on fingerprinting Large language models (LLMs) as a form of very lightweight instruction tuning. Results on 11 popularly-used LLMs showed that this approach is lightweight and does not affect the normal behavior of the model. It also prevents publisher overclaim, maintains robustness against fingerprint guessing and parameter-efficient training, and supports multi-stage fingerprinting akin to MIT License.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-21T09:51:45Z)
• Catch the Butterfly: Peeking into the Terms and Conflicts among SPDX Licenses [16.948633594354412]
  Third-party libraries (TPLs) in software development has accelerated the creation of modern software. Developers may inadvertently violate the licenses of TPLs, leading to legal issues. There is a need for a high-quality license dataset that encompasses a broad range of mainstream licenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T11:27:34Z)
• LILO: Learning Interpretable Libraries by Compressing and Documenting Code [71.55208585024198]
  We introduce LILO, a neurosymbolic framework that iteratively synthesizes, compresses, and documents code. LILO combines LLM-guided program synthesis with recent algorithmic advances in automated from Stitch. We find that AutoDoc boosts performance by helping LILO's synthesizer to interpret and deploy learned abstractions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T17:55:02Z)
• SILO Language Models: Isolating Legal Risk In a Nonparametric Datastore [159.21914121143885]
  We present SILO, a new language model that manages this risk-performance tradeoff during inference. SILO is built by (1) training a parametric LM on Open License Corpus (OLC), a new corpus we curate with 228B tokens of public domain and permissively licensed text. Access to the datastore greatly improves out of domain performance, closing 90% of the performance gap with an LM trained on the Pile.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T17:58:15Z)
• LiResolver: License Incompatibility Resolution for Open Source Software [13.28021004336228]
  LiResolver is a fine-grained, scalable, and flexible tool to resolve license incompatibility issues for open source software. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of LiResolver, with 4.09% false positive (FP) rate and 0.02% false negative (FN) rate for incompatibility issue localization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-26T13:16:09Z)
• FedSOV: Federated Model Secure Ownership Verification with Unforgeable Signature [60.99054146321459]
  Federated learning allows multiple parties to collaborate in learning a global model without revealing private data. We propose a cryptographic signature-based federated learning model ownership verification scheme named FedSOV.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T12:10:02Z)
• Lessons from Formally Verified Deployed Software Systems (Extended version) [65.69802414600832]
  This article examines a range of projects, in various application areas, that have produced formally verified systems and deployed them for actual use. It considers the technologies used, the form of verification applied, the results obtained, and the lessons that the software industry should draw regarding its ability to benefit from formal verification techniques and tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-05T18:18:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.