The Prevalence and Impact of Licenses in Open Software Projects

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23445v1
• Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 15:01:02 GMT
• Title: The Prevalence and Impact of Licenses in Open Software Projects
• Abstract summary: We identify licenses and license types for over 100M software projects.<n>Permissive licenses represent an increasing proportion of all licenses over time.<n>C-language ecosystems show reduced activity while Python shows increased activity when comparing restrictive to permissive license transition.
• Score: 11.111309839462814
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The terms of how publicly available source code can be used are dictated by its license. The license (or its absence), in turn, affects what code the project may reuse and how its code can be (re)used and may also affect external participation and overall activity of the project. We aim to better understand the general state of license distribution overall and within language ecosystems and to investigate if license changes are associated with a noticeable variations of project output. To accomplish that we identify licenses and license types for over 100M software projects and find that most do not contain any license, that permissive licenses represent the bulk of most licenses, and that permissive licensing is representing an increasing proportion of all licenses over time. Restrictive licenses are more likely to be retained, however. There is a great variation among language ecosystems with C-language strongly favoring restrictive licenses. The analysis of license change impact comparing activity within one year of the adoption of the initial and final licenses shows that the change from restrictive to permissive license varies with the ecosystem. C-language ecosystems show reduced activity while Python shows increased activity when comparing restrictive to permissive license transition. Our results demonstrate dramatic changes in license type prevalence over time and find that the effects of license changes may have opposite effects depending on the language ecosystem.

Related papers

• Partially ordering software licenses [1.4901285771725858]
  Licenses are legal instruments that inventors use to protect the technologies they build and regulate how they are used.<n>The nature of their authorship and selection means that how they are interpreted, chosen, and enforced is largely unstructured.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-30T02:03:21Z)
• CommonLID: Re-evaluating State-of-the-Art Language Identification Performance on Web Data [56.043078390377076]
  We introduce CommonLID, a community-driven, human-annotated LID benchmark for the web domain.<n>We show CommonLID's value by using it, alongside five other common evaluation sets, to test eight popular LID models.<n>We highlight that existing evaluations overestimate LID accuracy for many languages in the web domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T22:49:30Z)
• How Do Semantically Equivalent Code Transformations Impact Membership Inference on LLMs for Code? [56.42119949944239]
  We investigate whether semantically equivalent code transformation rules might be leveraged to evade MI detection.<n>We find that model accuracy drops by only 1.5% in the worst case for each rule.<n>Our results expose a critical loophole in license compliance enforcement for training large language models for code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-17T14:12:54Z)
• Scaling Laws for Code: Every Programming Language Matters [73.6302896079007]
  Code large language models (Code LLMs) are powerful but costly to train.<n>Different programming languages (PLs) have varying impacts during pre-training that significantly affect base model performance.<n>We present the first systematic exploration of scaling laws for multilingual code pre-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-15T16:07:34Z)
• LiveCLKTBench: Towards Reliable Evaluation of Cross-Lingual Knowledge Transfer in Multilingual LLMs [67.09110757873142]
  We present LiveCLKTBench, an automated generation pipeline designed to isolate and measure cross-lingual knowledge transfer.<n>Our pipeline identifies self-contained, time-sensitive knowledge entities from real-world domains.<n>The documents of these valid entities are then used to generate factual questions, which are translated into multiple languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-03T17:06:49Z)
• Small Changes, Big Trouble: Demystifying and Parsing License Variants for Incompatibility Detection in the PyPI Ecosystem [25.857078417049035]
  We conduct an empirical study of license variants in the PyPI ecosystem.<n>We introduce LV-, a novel approach for efficient license variant analysis leveraging diff-based techniques and large language models.<n> LV- achieves an accuracy of 0.936 while reducing computational costs by 30%, and LV-Compat identifies 5.2 times more incompatible packages than existing methods with a precision of 0.98.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-19T12:41:33Z)
• Catch the Butterfly: Peeking into the Terms and Conflicts among SPDX Licenses [16.948633594354412]
  Third-party libraries (TPLs) in software development has accelerated the creation of modern software. Developers may inadvertently violate the licenses of TPLs, leading to legal issues. There is a need for a high-quality license dataset that encompasses a broad range of mainstream licenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T11:27:34Z)
• Detecting and Fixing Violations of Modification Terms in Open Source Licenses during Forking [4.682961105225832]
  We first empirically characterize modification terms in 47 open source licenses. Inspired by our study, we then design LiVo to automatically detect and fix violations of modification terms in open source licenses during forking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T02:37:06Z)
• QA-LoRA: Quantization-Aware Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models [85.02796681773447]
  We propose a quantization-aware low-rank adaptation (QA-LoRA) algorithm. The motivation lies in the imbalanced degrees of freedom of quantization and adaptation. QA-LoRA is easily implemented with a few lines of code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-26T07:22:23Z)
• LiResolver: License Incompatibility Resolution for Open Source Software [13.28021004336228]
  LiResolver is a fine-grained, scalable, and flexible tool to resolve license incompatibility issues for open source software. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of LiResolver, with 4.09% false positive (FP) rate and 0.02% false negative (FN) rate for incompatibility issue localization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-26T13:16:09Z)
• Lessons from Formally Verified Deployed Software Systems (Extended version) [65.69802414600832]
  This article examines a range of projects, in various application areas, that have produced formally verified systems and deployed them for actual use. It considers the technologies used, the form of verification applied, the results obtained, and the lessons that the software industry should draw regarding its ability to benefit from formal verification techniques and tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-05T18:18:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.