Resourcefulness without Resource: Geometric Origins and Robustness
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31516v1
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:30:00 GMT
- Title: Resourcefulness without Resource: Geometric Origins and Robustness
- Abstract summary: A prevailing intuition holds that quantum protocols using only free states confer no operational advantage.<n>Known instances include nonlocality without entanglement and, more recently, nonstabilizerness without magic.<n>By contrast, non-free ensembles admit memory-assisted attacks that fully erase the gap, exposing a sharp operational asymmetry between free and resource-carrying ensembles.
- Score: 43.748379918040854
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: A prevailing intuition holds that quantum protocols using only free states confer no operational advantage. This intuition is contradicted by free-state discrimination gaps in which restricted measurements fail to optimally distinguish even orthogonal free states. Known instances include nonlocality without entanglement and, more recently, nonstabilizerness without magic. We trace these examples to a single convex-geometric mechanism: whenever the set of free measurements is closed, convex, and strict subset the set of all measurements, and the free states is a convex set with an interior, a gap-witnessing ensemble can be drawn entirely from the free states. The resulting gap is operationally rigid: no finite-dimensional assistance -- catalyst or quantum memory -- can asymptotically improve the discrimination rate beyond the single-shot restricted limit. By contrast, non-free ensembles admit memory-assisted attacks that fully erase the gap, exposing a sharp operational asymmetry between free and resource-carrying ensembles.
Related papers
- Witness robustness: An operational quantifier of measurement resources via free state discrimination [43.748379918040854]
We introduce the witness robustness of a resource quantifier whose measurements consist of free-state witnesses rather than physical measurements.<n>We identify conditions under which faithfulness is recovered and show that, in resource theories admitting a resource-destroying map, the witness vanishes for every measurement.<n>We derive analytical results for projective measurements in single-qubit magic and for binary pure-state projective measurements in the two-qubit entanglement theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-30T09:08:55Z) - Causal-Order Identification of Memoryless Sequential Quantum Processes from Restricted Projective Data [45.85698554568285]
We find necessary and sufficient conditions for deciding when an observed distribution is compatible with a memoryless sequential quantum process in a fixed direction.<n>We then specialize to the two-qubit Pauli setting, where the problem remains non-tomographic but becomes explicitly tractable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-06T07:16:29Z) - Freeness Reined in by a Single Qubit [36.94429692322632]
We find that, even in this setting, the correlation functions predicted by free probability theory receive corrections of order $O(1)$.<n>We trace their origin to non-uniformly distributed stationary quantum states, which we characterize analytically and confirm numerically.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-15T19:00:09Z) - Quantum-Like Correlations from Local Hidden-Variable Theories Under Conservation Law [45.88028371034407]
We show how to construct a local hidden-variable model that violates Bell inequalities.<n>The model also gives subtly different predictions to quantum mechanics, that could be tested experimentally.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-08T15:32:13Z) - Gaussian fermionic embezzlement of entanglement [41.321581612257056]
We show that the embezzling property is in fact a generic property of fermionic Gaussian states.<n>We bridge finite-size systems to abstract characterizations based on the classification of von Neumann algebras.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-19T08:26:03Z) - Quantum state exclusion for group-generated ensembles of pure states [0.0]
We provide a complete solution to optimal quantum state exclusion for arbitrary sets of pure states generated by finite groups.<n>When perfect exclusion is impossible, we introduce two natural extensions: minimum-error and unambiguous exclusion.<n>For both, we derive the optimal protocols and present analytical expressions for the corresponding failure probabilities and measurements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-04T12:47:02Z) - Measurement resolution enhanced coherence for lattice fermions [0.0]
We study a minimal many-particle model consisting of weakly measured non-interacting fermions in a one dimensional lattice.<n>We calculate the properties of these BFSs for systems up to 32 sites and find that even for moderate reductions in measurement resolution they yield non-trivial steady state entanglement and coherence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-15T22:05:13Z) - Experimental demonstration of optimal unambiguous two-out-of-four
quantum state elimination [52.77024349608834]
A core principle of quantum theory is that non-orthogonal quantum states cannot be perfectly distinguished with single-shot measurements.
Here we implement a quantum state elimination measurement which unambiguously rules out two of four pure, non-orthogonal quantum states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T18:00:01Z) - Unambiguous discrimination of Fermionic states through local operations
and classical communication [68.8204255655161]
The paper studies unambiguous discrimination of Fermionic states through local operations and classical communication (LOCC)
We show that it is not always possible to distinguish two Fermionic states through LOCC unambiguously with the same success probability as if global measurements were allowed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-11T21:08:52Z) - Zero Uncertainty States in the Presence of Quantum Memory [0.0]
We establish a simple connection between zero uncertainty and maximum entanglement.
This is of interest to foundational studies and practical applications, including quantum certification and verification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-04T14:36:23Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.