A Technical Typology of AI Systems in Public Administration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31755v1
• Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 14:44:56 GMT
• Title: A Technical Typology of AI Systems in Public Administration
• Abstract summary: This paper argues that public administration research would benefit from more technical precision on "AI"<n>We introduce a typology of five categories of AI systems: hand-coded, glass-box, black-box, general-purpose, and agentic systems.<n>We evaluate technical precision in recent public administration research about AI by coding 91 highly-cited papers.
• Score: 3.8829536251159404
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Research on artificial intelligence (AI) in the public sector often treats "AI" as a single category, neglecting technical distinctions between different AI systems. But these distinctions affect how different systems impact core public values like accountability, procedural justice, and non-discrimination. This paper argues that public administration research would benefit from more technical precision on "AI" and makes three contributions to this end. First, we introduce a typology of five categories of AI systems: hand-coded, glass-box, black-box, general-purpose, and agentic systems. We calibrate the typology to public administration by grouping system types by their distinct implications for public values. Second, we evaluate technical precision in recent public administration research about AI by coding 91 highly-cited papers (2019-2025) using our typology. We find widespread imprecision: most papers (55\%) leave the studied system underspecified, 31\% motivate their work with a different system than they study, and 41\% make more general conclusions than the studied system supports. Finally, we give practical recommendations for future research. We highlight common pitfalls to avoid, and suggest that researchers should, at a minimum, provide enough technical detail to locate the studied system in our typology. To this end, we provide a practical guide -- a short set of diagnostic questions answerable from public information and without specialist technical knowledge.

Related papers

• When AI Classifies: What Counts as Public Administration? [0.0]
  This study examines how alternative systems of scholarly representation identify and characterize broad public administration (PA) and artificial intelligence related public administration (AI-in-PA) scholarship.<n>Using Web of Science and OpenAlex, it compares five approaches based on author-defined, citation-driven, and AI-assisted representations.<n>The results highlight substantial differences in corpus size, publication types, publishing outlets, temporal development, and thematic clustering and structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-26T20:44:17Z)
• Bias is a Math Problem, AI Bias is a Technical Problem: 10-year Literature Review of AI/LLM Bias Research Reveals Narrow [Gender-Centric] Conceptions of 'Bias', and Academia-Industry Gap [0.1534667887016089]
  We conduct a review of research covering AI/LLM bias in four premier venues/organizations -- *ACL, FAccT, NeurIPS, and AAAI.<n>Through a coverage of 189 papers, we uncover patterns of bias research and along what axes of human identity they commonly focus.<n>We conclude with recommendations towards future AI/LLM fairness research, with stronger focus on diverse marginalized populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-14T20:53:33Z)
• AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research [55.5452803680643]
  We present a comprehensive survey on AI for Research (AI4Research)<n>We first introduce a systematic taxonomy to classify five mainstream tasks in AI4Research.<n>We identify key research gaps and highlight promising future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T17:19:20Z)
• AI-driven Personalized Privacy Assistants: a Systematic Literature Review [0.0]
  We present a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to map the existing solutions found in the scientific literature.<n>We screened several hundred unique research papers over the recent years (2013-2025), constructing a classification from 41 included papers.<n>We provide a comprehensive classification for AI-driven PPAs, delving into their architectural choices, system contexts, types of AI used, data sources, types of decisions, and control over decisions, among other facets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T16:46:56Z)
• SoK: On the Offensive Potential of AI [14.072632973726906]
  More and more evidence shows that AI is also used for offensive purposes.<n>No extant work has been able to draw a holistic picture of the offensive potential of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T14:02:44Z)
• Aligning AI with Public Values: Deliberation and Decision-Making for Governing Multimodal LLMs in Political Video Analysis [48.14390493099495]
  How AI models should deal with political topics has been discussed, but it remains challenging and requires better governance.<n>This paper examines the governance of large language models through individual and collective deliberation, focusing on politically sensitive videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T03:17:38Z)
• The Pursuit of Fairness in Artificial Intelligence Models: A Survey [2.124791625488617]
  This survey offers a synopsis of the different ways researchers have promoted fairness in AI systems. A thorough study is conducted of the approaches and techniques employed by researchers to mitigate bias in AI models. We also delve into the impact of biased models on user experience and the ethical considerations to contemplate when developing and deploying such models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T02:33:36Z)
• A survey of recent methods for addressing AI fairness and bias in biomedicine [48.46929081146017]
  Artificial intelligence systems may perpetuate social inequities or demonstrate biases, such as those based on race or gender. We surveyed recent publications on different debiasing methods in the fields of biomedical natural language processing (NLP) or computer vision (CV) We performed a literature search on PubMed, ACM digital library, and IEEE Xplore of relevant articles published between January 2018 and December 2023 using multiple combinations of keywords. We reviewed other potential methods from the general domain that could be applied to biomedicine to address bias and improve fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T06:38:46Z)
• Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
  There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)
• Core and Periphery as Closed-System Precepts for Engineering General Intelligence [62.997667081978825]
  It is unclear if an AI system's inputs will be independent of its outputs, and, therefore, if AI systems can be treated as traditional components. This paper posits that engineering general intelligence requires new general systems precepts, termed the core and periphery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-04T18:20:25Z)
• Human-in-the-Loop Disinformation Detection: Stance, Sentiment, or Something Else? [93.91375268580806]
  Both politics and pandemics have recently provided ample motivation for the development of machine learning-enabled disinformation (a.k.a. fake news) detection algorithms. Existing literature has focused primarily on the fully-automated case, but the resulting techniques cannot reliably detect disinformation on the varied topics, sources, and time scales required for military applications. By leveraging an already-available analyst as a human-in-the-loop, canonical machine learning techniques of sentiment analysis, aspect-based sentiment analysis, and stance detection become plausible methods to use for a partially-automated disinformation detection system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-09T13:30:34Z)
• Bias in Multimodal AI: Testbed for Fair Automatic Recruitment [73.85525896663371]
  We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data. We train automatic recruitment algorithms using a set of multimodal synthetic profiles consciously scored with gender and racial biases. Our methodology and results show how to generate fairer AI-based tools in general, and in particular fairer automated recruitment systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T15:58:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.