A Filtered Mixture-of-Generators for Fully Synthetic Survival Training
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.00127v1
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:02:19 GMT
- Title: A Filtered Mixture-of-Generators for Fully Synthetic Survival Training
- Abstract summary: FoGS (Filtered Mixture-of-Generators for Survival analysis) reframes synthetic-data construction as sample selection rather than generation.<n>On 16 public datasets under train-on-synthetic, test-on-real (C-index and IBS, $0$$100$ scale), FoGS yields mean improvements of $+2.17$ in C-index and $+0.67$ in IBS.
- Score: 9.592144785458443
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Survival analysis models time-to-event data, but in clinical settings training data are costly and scarce: events accrue over years of follow-up, cohorts are small, and privacy regulations restrict sharing across institutions. Tabular generative models promise augmentation and privacy-preserving cohort sharing, yet are themselves data-hungry -- on the small cohorts typical of survival analysis, a single generator rarely characterizes the population well enough for downstream models trained on its output to match real-data performance. FoGS (Filtered Mixture-of-Generators for Survival analysis) reframes synthetic-data construction as sample selection rather than generation. A candidate pool is drawn from four architecturally distinct tabular generators, and each sample is scored by an ensemble of seven survival models trained on real data, using proper scoring rules as a per-sample plausibility proxy. A two-level pipeline optimizes, in its outer loop, a selection policy -- generator quotas, scorer weights, a random complement, and stratified balancing on event time and censoring -- against held-out downstream performance, while an inner loop tunes the downstream model (XGBoost-Cox). On 16 public datasets under train-on-synthetic, test-on-real (C-index and IBS, $0$--$100$ scale), FoGS yields mean improvements of $+2.17$ in C-index and $+0.67$ in IBS, improving both metrics on 9 of 16 datasets and at least one on 13 (one-sided Wilcoxon $p=0.039$ and $p=0.035$). It matches or exceeds real-data training on most cohorts, with no significant change in nearest-neighbour privacy margin relative to unfiltered sampling. Sample filtering over a heterogeneous generator pool is thus a viable substitute for real-data training in privacy-restricted clinical settings.
Related papers
- Transformer-Based Active Learning for Data-Efficient Vaccine Epitope Selection in PRRS [0.0]
We evaluate machine learning approaches to classify instances of high binding affinity between 9-mers and a well-conserved swine antigen receptor.<n>In this work, we evaluate machine learning (ML) approaches where variants of active learning are used to classify instances of high binding affinity between 9-mers and a well-conserved swine antigen receptor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-27T00:29:29Z) - Active Learning with Low-Rank Structure for Data Selection [85.43185363043362]
We introduce a new data selection framework based on low-rank approximation and residual-based sampling.<n>We show that it is possible to select a weighted subset of $tildeOleft(k + frac1varepsilon2right)$ data points whose average loss approximates the average loss over the full dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-14T22:29:59Z) - Inference-Time Refinement Closes the Synthetic-Real Gap in Tabular Diffusion [8.745106905496282]
We introduce an inferencetime refinement framework that operates on a frozen pre-trained backbone.<n>Inference-time refinement reaches and exceeds real-data utility in 1 to 80 minutes on a single consumer-grade GPU.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-07T13:37:03Z) - Filtering with Confidence: When Data Augmentation Meets Conformal Prediction [10.431187957711206]
We propose a principled data filtering framework for synthetic data augmentation.<n>We show consistent performance improvements of up to 40% in F1 score over unaugmented baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-25T19:42:02Z) - CLIMB: CLustering-based Iterative Data Mixture Bootstrapping for Language Model Pre-training [63.07024608399447]
We propose an automated framework that discovers, evaluates, and refines data mixtures in a pre-training setting.<n>We introduce ClimbLab, a filtered 1.2-trillion-token corpus with 20 clusters as a research playground, and ClimbMix, a compact yet powerful 400-billion-token dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-17T17:58:13Z) - Heterogeneous Datasets for Federated Survival Analysis Simulation [6.489759672413373]
This work proposes a novel technique for constructing realistic heterogeneous datasets by starting from existing non-federated datasets in a reproducible way.
Specifically, we provide two novel dataset-splitting algorithms based on the Dirichlet distribution to assign each data sample to a carefully chosen client.
The implementation of the proposed methods is publicly available in favor of and to encourage common practices to simulate federated environments for survival analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-28T11:37:07Z) - Breaking the Spurious Causality of Conditional Generation via Fairness
Intervention with Corrective Sampling [77.15766509677348]
Conditional generative models often inherit spurious correlations from the training dataset.
This can result in label-conditional distributions that are imbalanced with respect to another latent attribute.
We propose a general two-step strategy to mitigate this issue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-05T08:09:33Z) - Generative Models with Information-Theoretic Protection Against
Membership Inference Attacks [6.840474688871695]
Deep generative models, such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), synthesize diverse high-fidelity data samples.
GANs may disclose private information from the data they are trained on, making them susceptible to adversarial attacks.
We propose an information theoretically motivated regularization term that prevents the generative model from overfitting to training data and encourages generalizability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-31T19:29:55Z) - Generalizing electrocardiogram delineation: training convolutional
neural networks with synthetic data augmentation [63.51064808536065]
Existing databases for ECG delineation are small, being insufficient in size and in the array of pathological conditions they represent.
This article delves has two main contributions. First, a pseudo-synthetic data generation algorithm was developed, based in probabilistically composing ECG traces given "pools" of fundamental segments, as cropped from the original databases, and a set of rules for their arrangement into coherent synthetic traces.
Second, two novel segmentation-based loss functions have been developed, which attempt at enforcing the prediction of an exact number of independent structures and at producing closer segmentation boundaries by focusing on a reduced number of samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-25T10:11:41Z) - Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With
Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model.
We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data.
Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z) - Automatic sleep stage classification with deep residual networks in a
mixed-cohort setting [63.52264764099532]
We developed a novel deep neural network model to assess the generalizability of several large-scale cohorts.
Overall classification accuracy improved with increasing fractions of training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-21T10:48:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.