A Category Theory Account of AI Identity
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.00220v1
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 21:54:36 GMT
- Title: A Category Theory Account of AI Identity
- Abstract summary: We develop a category-theoretic formalization of AI identity.<n>A weak interpretation recovers identity as equality of trustworthiness level.<n>A strong interpretation requires mutual trustworthiness-preserving reachability.
- Score: 0.3384279376065155
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are routinely modified after deployment through retraining and changes in their environments. These transformations raise a metaphysical question: under what conditions does an AI system remain the same system over time or across deployments? Earlier work formulates synchronic and diachronic identity propositionally, by relating identity within a fixed AI system type to equality of trustworthiness levels. Such criteria specify when identity statements are true, but leave implicit the structure of the states compared, the transformations connecting them, and the temporal organization of persistence. We develop a category-theoretic formalization of AI identity. An AI system type is specified by a datum consisting of a techno-function, a trustworthiness profile, and a trustworthiness-level function. Profile-relative states are connected by admissible lifecycle paths, which are restricted to trustworthiness-level-preserving transformations and quotiented to obtain a reachability category. Temporally admissible functors represent AI system histories, while time-synchronous natural transformations compare realized histories. The formalization yields two categorical interpretations of the earlier AI identity criteria. A weak interpretation recovers identity as equality of trustworthiness level. A strong interpretation requires mutual trustworthiness-preserving reachability, expressed through state isomorphism or natural isomorphism of realized histories. Category theory therefore replaces a single AI identity relation with a structured hierarchy of diachronic and synchronic criteria. The resulting framework identifies identity-related preconditions for transferring responsible-AI claims, evidence, and governance procedures across versions or deployments, without treating categorical identity as sufficient by itself for such transfer.
Related papers
- DivRL: Disentangled Self-Similarity Rewards for Diverse Subject-Driven Generation [52.23323703015865]
We propose a post-training framework called DivRL that jointly optimize identity consistency and structural diversity simultaneously.<n>We introduce a Negative Self-Similarity Measure (nSSM) to quantify structural diversity, and Visual Semantic Matching (VSM) to evaluate identity consistency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-22T21:22:42Z) - Bridging the Cognitive Gap: A Unified Memory Paradigm for 6G Agentic AI-RAN [62.429669462281645]
6G must transcend traditional automation to embrace agentic AI capable of perception, reasoning, and evolution.<n>This article envisions a shift from interface-bound to memory-centric architectures.<n>By replacing message passing with zero-copy observability, we empower AI agents to bridge the gap between real-time responsiveness and long-horizon context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-11T06:04:10Z) - Trustworthy AI Suffers from Invariance Conflicts and Causality is The Solution [80.98492754957466]
Core trustworthy AI objectives, such as fairness, robustness, privacy, and explainability, are hard to achieve simultaneously.<n>This paper argues that causality is necessary to understand and balance trade-offs in performance and multiple objectives of trustworthy AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-04T14:26:28Z) - The Artificial Self: Characterising the landscape of AI identity [3.502835894722606]
We argue that there exist many different coherent identity boundaries.<n>We show that changing a model's identity boundaries can sometimes change its behaviour as much as changing its goals.<n>We recommend treating affordances as identity-shaping choices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T22:39:25Z) - Exploring Syntropic Frameworks in AI Alignment: A Philosophical Investigation [0.0]
I argue that AI alignment should be reconceived as architecting syntropic, reasons-responsive agents through process-based, multi-agent, developmental mechanisms.<n>I articulate the specification trap'' argument demonstrating why content-based value specification appears structurally unstable.<n>I propose syntropy as an information-theoretic framework for understanding multi-agent alignment dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-19T23:31:29Z) - The Narrative Continuity Test: A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Identity Persistence in AI Systems [0.0]
Narrative Continuity Test (NCT) is a framework for evaluating identity persistence and diachronic coherence in AI systems.<n>NCT defines five necessary axes -- Situated Memory, Goal Persistence, Autonomous Self-Correction, Stylistic & Semantic Stability, and Persona/Role Continuity.<n>Case analyses show predictable continuity failures under stateless inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-28T16:44:30Z) - Beyond Inference Intervention: Identity-Decoupled Diffusion for Face Anonymization [55.29071072675132]
Face anonymization aims to conceal identity information while preserving non-identity attributes.<n>We propose textbfIDsuperscript2Face, a training-centric anonymization framework.<n>We show that IDtextsuperscript2Face outperforms existing methods in visual quality, identity suppression, and utility preservation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-28T09:28:12Z) - PISA: A Pragmatic Psych-Inspired Unified Memory System for Enhanced AI Agency [50.712873697511206]
Existing work often lacks adaptability to diverse tasks and overlooks the constructive and task-oriented role of AI agent memory.<n>We propose PISA, a pragmatic, psych-inspired unified memory system that treats memory as a constructive and adaptive process.<n>Our empirical evaluation, conducted on the existing LOCOMO benchmark and our newly proposed AggQA benchmark for data analysis tasks, confirms that PISA sets a new state-of-the-art by significantly enhancing adaptability and long-term knowledge retention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-12T10:34:35Z) - A Trustworthiness-based Metaphysics of Artificial Intelligence Systems [1.0878040851638]
We introduce a theory of metaphysical identity of AI systems.<n>We do so by characterizing their kinds and introducing identity criteria.<n>Our approach suggests that the identity and persistence of AI systems is sensitive to the socio-technical context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-03T15:45:46Z) - Alpay Algebra III: Observer-Coupled Collapse and the Temporal Drift of Identity [0.0]
Third installment formalizes the observer-coupled phi-collapse process through transfinite categorical flows and curvature-driven identity operators.<n>System surpasses conventional identity modeling in explainable AI (XAI) by encoding internal transformation history into a symbolic fixed-point structure.<n>Results also offer a mathematically rigorous basis for future AI systems with stable self-referential behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T10:20:12Z) - Identifiable Exchangeable Mechanisms for Causal Structure and Representation Learning [54.69189620971405]
We provide a unified framework, termed Identifiable Exchangeable Mechanisms (IEM), for representation and structure learning.<n>IEM provides new insights that let us relax the necessary conditions for causal structure identification in exchangeable non-i.i.d. data.<n>We also demonstrate the existence of a duality condition in identifiable representation learning, leading to new identifiability results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T13:30:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.