A Trustworthiness-based Metaphysics of Artificial Intelligence Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.03233v1
• Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2025 15:45:46 GMT
• Title: A Trustworthiness-based Metaphysics of Artificial Intelligence Systems
• Authors: Andrea Ferrario,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a theory of metaphysical identity of AI systems.<n>We do so by characterizing their kinds and introducing identity criteria.<n>Our approach suggests that the identity and persistence of AI systems is sensitive to the socio-technical context.
• Score: 1.0878040851638
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Modern AI systems are man-made objects that leverage machine learning to support our lives across a myriad of contexts and applications. Despite extensive epistemological and ethical debates, their metaphysical foundations remain relatively under explored. The orthodox view simply suggests that AI systems, as artifacts, lack well-posed identity and persistence conditions -- their metaphysical kinds are no real kinds. In this work, we challenge this perspective by introducing a theory of metaphysical identity of AI systems. We do so by characterizing their kinds and introducing identity criteria -- formal rules that answer the questions "When are two AI systems the same?" and "When does an AI system persist, despite change?" Building on Carrara and Vermaas' account of fine-grained artifact kinds, we argue that AI trustworthiness provides a lens to understand AI system kinds and formalize the identity of these artifacts by relating their functional requirements to their physical make-ups. The identity criteria of AI systems are determined by their trustworthiness profiles -- the collection of capabilities that the systems must uphold over time throughout their artifact histories, and their effectiveness in maintaining these capabilities. Our approach suggests that the identity and persistence of AI systems is sensitive to the socio-technical context of their design and utilization via their trustworthiness, providing a solid metaphysical foundation to the epistemological, ethical, and legal discussions about these artifacts.

Related papers

• Explainability Through Systematicity: The Hard Systematicity Challenge for Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  This paper argues that explainability is only one facet of a broader ideal that shapes our expectations towards artificial intelligence (AI)<n>I offer a conceptual framework for thinking about "the systematicity of thought" that distinguishes four senses of the phrase.<n>To determine whether we have reason to hold AI models to this ideal of systematicity, I then argue, we must look to the rationales for systematization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T19:50:21Z)
• From Human to Machine Psychology: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Well-Being in Large Language Models [0.0]
  This paper introduces the concept of machine flourishing and proposes the PAPERS framework.<n>Our findings underscore the importance of developing AI-specific models of flourishing that account for both human-aligned and system-specific priorities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T20:14:02Z)
• AI Automatons: AI Systems Intended to Imitate Humans [54.19152688545896]
  There is a growing proliferation of AI systems designed to mimic people's behavior, work, abilities, likenesses, or humanness.<n>The research, design, deployment, and availability of such AI systems have prompted growing concerns about a wide range of possible legal, ethical, and other social impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T03:55:38Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
  We examine what is known about human wisdom and sketch a vision of its AI counterpart.<n>We argue that AI systems particularly struggle with metacognition.<n>We discuss how wise AI might be benchmarked, trained, and implemented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z)
• Assurance of AI Systems From a Dependability Perspective [0.0]
  We outline the principles of classical assurance for computer-based systems that pose significant risks.<n>We then consider application of these principles to systems that employ Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)<n>For guards that require perception using AI and ML, we examine ways to minimize the trust placed in these elements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T23:55:43Z)
• The Switch, the Ladder, and the Matrix: Models for Classifying AI Systems [0.0]
  There still exists a gap between principles and practices in AI ethics. One major obstacle organisations face when attempting to operationalise AI Ethics is the lack of a well-defined material scope.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T12:16:01Z)
• Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)-Native Wireless Systems: A Journey Beyond 6G [58.440115433585824]
  Building future wireless systems that support services like digital twins (DTs) is challenging to achieve through advances to conventional technologies like meta-surfaces. While artificial intelligence (AI)-native networks promise to overcome some limitations of wireless technologies, developments still rely on AI tools like neural networks. This paper revisits the concept of AI-native wireless systems, equipping them with the common sense necessary to transform them into artificial general intelligence (AGI)-native systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T04:51:05Z)
• AI and Identity [0.8879149917735942]
  This paper examines the intersection of AI and identity as a pathway to understand biases, inequalities, and ethical considerations in AI development and deployment. We propose a framework that highlights the need for diversity in AI across three dimensions: Creators, Creations, and Consequences through the lens of identity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T15:07:30Z)
• On the Emergence of Symmetrical Reality [51.21203247240322]
  We introduce the symmetrical reality framework, which offers a unified representation encompassing various forms of physical-virtual amalgamations. We propose an instance of an AI-driven active assistance service that illustrates the potential applications of symmetrical reality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T16:09:39Z)
• Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic Systems [67.01132165581667]
  We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components. We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z)
• Never trust, always verify : a roadmap for Trustworthy AI? [12.031113181911627]
  We examine trust in the context of AI-based systems to understand what it means for an AI system to be trustworthy. We suggest a trust (resp. zero-trust) model for AI and suggest a set of properties that should be satisfied to ensure the trustworthiness of AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-23T21:13:10Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.