Neuro-Symbolic Safety Guidance for Vision-Language-Action Models via Constrained Flow Matching
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01378v1
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 18:41:33 GMT
- Title: Neuro-Symbolic Safety Guidance for Vision-Language-Action Models via Constrained Flow Matching
- Abstract summary: Existing safety measures only prevent collisions caused by the robot's next action.<n>We propose a neuro-symbolic safety guidance mechanism for flow matching based VLAs that enables predictive collision avoidance.<n>Our method achieves 82.8% collision avoidance and 81.6% task success, a 6.3% and 19.8% improvement respectively over single-step methods.
- Score: 11.335076684744628
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated promising generalization capabilities across robotic manipulation tasks, yet their real-world deployment remains limited by the lack of effective safety measures. Specifically, existing safety measures only prevent collisions caused by the robot's next action. In this paper, we propose a neuro-symbolic safety guidance mechanism for flow matching based VLAs that enables predictive collision avoidance. Flow matching based VLAs determine the next actions by predicting a trajectory (a sequence of actions) through an iterative neural flow matching process. Our method formulates safety enforcement as a minimum-norm constrained optimization problem that corrects safety violations during the denoising process of noisy intermediate trajectory predictions. By analyzing predicted trajectories and applying corrections during iterative denoising, our approach anticipates collisions before they become unavoidable. This interleaving of symbolic constraint satisfaction with neural trajectory generation enables predictive collision avoidance rather than reactive intervention. On the SafeLIBERO benchmark, our method achieves 82.8% collision avoidance and 81.6% task success, a 6.3% and 19.8% improvement respectively over single-step methods, with the largest gains on long-horizon tasks where compounding distribution shift is most pronounced. Video demonstrations of our approach are included on our project page at https://willenglish.tech/SafetyGuidedFlowMatching/.
Related papers
- The Geometry of Refusal: Linear Instability in Safety-Aligned LLMs [1.4323566945483497]
We introduce Contrastive Logit Steering ( CLS), a zero-optimization framework that isolates the "refusal direction"<n> CLS operates directly on the output distribution, serving as a diagnostic probe for alignment.<n>Our experiments on 7 model families reveal that safety implementation is architecturally deterministic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-21T22:04:48Z) - DTP-Attack: A decision-based black-box adversarial attack on trajectory prediction [8.287137851936523]
Trajectory prediction systems are critical for autonomous vehicle safety.<n>Trajectory prediction systems are vulnerable to adversarial attacks that can cause catastrophic traffic behavior misinterpretations.<n>We propose DTP-Attack, a decision-based black-box adversarial attack framework tailored for trajectory prediction systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-27T14:30:37Z) - Shifting Uncertainty to Critical Moments: Towards Reliable Uncertainty Quantification for VLA Model [10.781664119473966]
We propose a unified uncertainty quantification approach for predicting rollout success versus failure.<n>Our method substantially improves failure prediction accuracy and yields more reliable signals for failure detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-18T22:52:03Z) - BarrierSteer: LLM Safety via Learning Barrier Steering [83.12893815611052]
BarrierSteer is a novel framework that formalizes safety by embedding learned non-linear safety constraints directly into the model's latent representation space.<n>We show that BarrierSteer substantially reduces adversarial success rates, decreases unsafe generations, and outperforms existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-23T18:19:46Z) - ResAD: Normalized Residual Trajectory Modeling for End-to-End Autonomous Driving [64.42138266293202]
ResAD is a Normalized Residual Trajectory Modeling framework.<n>It reframes the learning task to predict the residual deviation from an inertial reference.<n>On the NAVSIM benchmark, ResAD achieves a state-of-the-art PDMS of 88.6 using a vanilla diffusion policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-09T17:59:36Z) - Embedding Poisoning: Bypassing Safety Alignment via Embedding Semantic Shift [23.0914017433021]
This work identifies a novel class of deployment phase attacks that exploit a vulnerability by injecting imperceptible perturbations directly into the embedding layer outputs without modifying model weights or input text.<n>We propose Search based Embedding Poisoning, a practical, model agnostic framework that introduces carefully optimized perturbations into embeddings associated with high risk tokens.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-08T05:00:58Z) - Rethinking Safety in LLM Fine-tuning: An Optimization Perspective [56.31306558218838]
We show that poor optimization choices, rather than inherent trade-offs, often cause safety problems, measured as harmful responses to adversarial prompts.<n>We propose a simple exponential moving average (EMA) momentum technique in parameter space that preserves safety performance.<n>Our experiments on the Llama families across multiple datasets demonstrate that safety problems can largely be avoided without specialized interventions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-17T23:46:36Z) - HybridVLA: Collaborative Diffusion and Autoregression in a Unified Vision-Language-Action Model [54.64088247291416]
A fundamental objective of manipulation policy design is to endow robots to comprehend human instructions, reason about scene cues, and execute generalized actions in dynamic environments.<n>Recent autoregressive vision-language-action (VLA) methods inherit common-sense reasoning capabilities from vision-language models (VLMs) for next action-token prediction.<n>We introduce HybridVLA, a unified framework that absorbs the continuous nature of diffusion-based actions and the contextual reasoning of autoregression.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-13T17:59:52Z) - Meta-Learning Priors for Safe Bayesian Optimization [72.8349503901712]
We build on a meta-learning algorithm, F-PACOH, capable of providing reliable uncertainty quantification in settings of data scarcity.
As core contribution, we develop a novel framework for choosing safety-compliant priors in a data-riven manner.
On benchmark functions and a high-precision motion system, we demonstrate that our meta-learned priors accelerate the convergence of safe BO approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-03T08:38:38Z) - Log Barriers for Safe Black-box Optimization with Application to Safe
Reinforcement Learning [72.97229770329214]
We introduce a general approach for seeking high dimensional non-linear optimization problems in which maintaining safety during learning is crucial.
Our approach called LBSGD is based on applying a logarithmic barrier approximation with a carefully chosen step size.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on minimizing violation in policy tasks in safe reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-21T11:14:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.