The Future of NLP may not be at NLP Conferences: Scholarly Migration Patterns in Natural Language Processing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02416v2
• Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2026 16:31:46 GMT
• Title: The Future of NLP may not be at NLP Conferences: Scholarly Migration Patterns in Natural Language Processing
• Abstract summary: Advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to a blurring of the disciplinary lines between NLP and general Machine Learning (ML)<n>These general ML venues confer a significant citation premium, which influences venue selection.<n>These results point to a significant shift in where NLP research is published.
• Score: 29.40998645688252
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Natural Language Processing (NLP) has traditionally been published in its core disciplinary venues like ACL. However, advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to a blurring of the disciplinary lines between NLP and general Machine Learning (ML), with authors regularly publishing in venues from both fields. Here, we ask whether the disciplinary center of gravity is shifting. Using NLP research published from 2010 to 2026 and studies of both established and new authors, we find that a migration is taking place. First, comparing the pre- and post-LLM eras, established authors lost 19.2pp of share at flagship *ACL main-conference tracks while gaining 14.8pp in the newer Findings tracks, and general ML venues rose 8.6pp, even when adjusting for parallel growth in the fields. Second, among newer authors who debut with at least three first-author NLP-topic papers, the share whose work appears mostly at *ACL venues fell from 84% (2019) to 74% (2024), while the share appearing mostly at general ML venues rose from 5% to 21%. Using causal inference techniques, we estimate that these general ML venues confer a significant citation premium, which influences venue selection. Together, these results point to a significant shift in where NLP research is published.

Related papers

• From Interpretability to Control: Insights from Six Years of the TrustNLP Workshop [63.00693129203923]
  The Workshop on Trustworthy Natural Language Processing has grown from 8 proceedings papers to 41 over six editions.<n>We synthesize insights from all 144 proceedings papers, classifying them along six trust dimensions grounded in established frameworks.<n>Analysis from the classification study reveals that truthfulness is the fastest-growing dimension (absent in 2021-2022, comprising 37% of papers by 2025-2026)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T17:30:16Z)
• Good Intentions Beyond ACL: Who Does NLP for Social Good, and Where? [10.625563168098317]
  In recent years, almost 20% of all papers in the ACL Anthology address topics related to social good.<n>In this study, we take an author- and venue-level perspective to map the landscape of NLP4SG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T02:04:42Z)
• Transforming Scholarly Landscapes: Influence of Large Language Models on Academic Fields beyond Computer Science [77.31665252336157]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have ushered in a transformative era in Natural Language Processing (NLP) This work empirically examines the influence and use of LLMs in fields beyond NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T01:32:35Z)
• Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers [99.67983375899719]
  We conduct the first systematic, large-scale analysis across 950,965 papers published between January 2020 and February 2024 on the arXiv, bioRxiv, and Nature portfolio journals. Our findings reveal a steady increase in LLM usage, with the largest and fastest growth observed in Computer Science papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T17:45:15Z)
• Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews [51.453135368388686]
  We present an approach for estimating the fraction of text in a large corpus which is likely to be substantially modified or produced by a large language model (LLM) Our maximum likelihood model leverages expert-written and AI-generated reference texts to accurately and efficiently examine real-world LLM-use at the corpus level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T21:51:39Z)
• NLLG Quarterly arXiv Report 09/23: What are the most influential current AI Papers? [21.68589129842815]
  The US dominates among both top-40 and top-9k papers, followed by China. Europe clearly lags behind and is hardly represented in the top-40 most cited papers. US industry is largely overrepresented in the top-40 most influential papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-09T21:42:20Z)
• Defining a New NLP Playground [85.41973504055588]
  The recent explosion of performance of large language models has changed the field of Natural Language Processing more abruptly and seismically than any other shift in the field's 80-year history. This paper proposes 20+ PhD-dissertation-worthy research directions, covering theoretical analysis, new and challenging problems, learning paradigms, and interdisciplinary applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T17:02:33Z)
• We are Who We Cite: Bridges of Influence Between Natural Language Processing and Other Academic Fields [30.550895983110806]
  Cross-field engagement of Natural Language Processing has declined. Less than 8% of NLP citations are to linguistics. Less than 3% of NLP citations are to math and psychology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T12:42:06Z)
• NLLG Quarterly arXiv Report 06/23: What are the most influential current AI Papers? [15.830129136642755]
  The objective is to offer a quick guide to the most relevant and widely discussed research, aiding both newcomers and established researchers in staying abreast of current trends. We observe the dominance of papers related to Large Language Models (LLMs) and specifically ChatGPT during the first half of 2023. NLP related papers are the most influential (around 60% of top papers) even though there are twice as many ML related papers in our data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T11:53:52Z)
• Geographic Citation Gaps in NLP Research [63.13508571014673]
  This work asks a series of questions on the relationship between geographical location and publication success. We first created a dataset of 70,000 papers from the ACL Anthology, extracted their meta-information, and generated their citation network. We show that not only are there substantial geographical disparities in paper acceptance and citation but also that these disparities persist even when controlling for a number of variables such as venue of publication and sub-field of NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T02:25:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.