AGL-1: The Enterprise AI Governance Layer as a Control Plane for Trusted Enterprise Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03516v1
• Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2026 17:42:08 GMT
• Title: AGL-1: The Enterprise AI Governance Layer as a Control Plane for Trusted Enterprise Intelligence
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces AGL-1, the Enterprise AI Governance Layer, as a vendor-neutral reference model for the control plane.<n>It defines seven governance domains: identity-aware retrieval, policy enforcement, management, memory governance, knowledge integrity monitoring, agentic execution control, and trust observability.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Enterprise artificial intelligence is moving from isolated experimentation toward operational dependency across copilots, retrieval-augmented generation systems, autonomous agents, and AI-enabled business workflows. As this transition accelerates, the primary enterprise challenge is no longer only model access or inference scale. It is governed intelligence operations: the ability to enforce authorization, preserve contextual lineage, control persistent memory, detect stale or conflicting knowledge, constrain agentic execution, and produce audit-ready evidence across distributed AI estates. This paper introduces AGL-1, the Enterprise AI Governance Layer, as a vendor-neutral reference model for the control plane that should operate across foundation models, retrieval systems, orchestration frameworks, enterprise memory, policy engines, observability systems, tools, APIs, and business applications. Building on governed knowledge-system principles introduced in GKS-5, AGL-1 generalizes the governance problem from retrieval-specific controls to full AI execution-path governance. It identifies recurring failure modes such as unauthorized retrieval, stale grounding, unmanaged memory, weak provenance, policy drift, fragmented observability, and uncontrolled autonomous execution. It then defines seven governance domains: identity-aware retrieval, policy enforcement, provenance management, memory governance, knowledge integrity monitoring, agentic execution control, and trust observability. The central claim is that durable enterprise value from AI will increasingly depend on the ability to govern intelligence at scale. In complex enterprises, trust is not a property of the model alone. It is a property of the system around the model: identity, knowledge, policy, memory, tools, human oversight, and evidence working together as a managed control plane.

Related papers

• Securing Agentic AI: From Per-Action Checks to Trajectory Assurance [8.523545468742919]
  As large language model (LLM)-based agents become more autonomous, securing them evolves from a single challenge into a broad and interconnected landscape spanning the entire agentic stack.<n>Perhaps the most fundamental challenge is behavioral containment: sequences of individually permissible actions may collectively violate system-level constraints and safety invariants.<n>At the broader level, supply-chain integrity, provenance, accountability, and end-to-end observability remain largely open problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T00:28:49Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Embodied Intelligence: A Systems Framework and Graded Trustworthiness Levels [53.63220028820581]
  Embodied intelligence integrates learned perception and decision making with real-time computation, control, and physical interaction.<n>We define trustworthy embodied intelligence as the sustained capacity to execute specified tasks reliably.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-28T17:50:44Z)
• Traccia: An OpenTelemetry-Based Governance Platform for AI Systems [0.7919969809015938]
  The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Artificial Intelligent (AI) powered autonomous agents has fundamentally changed the existing forms of software governance.<n>Current solutions fail to protect unbound state space agentic architecture from serious threats such as alignment, security concerns, and unauthorized deployment of shadow AI systems.<n>A solution is proposed for overcoming the discussed challenges in form of a coherent multi-level AI governance stack Traccia built on the top of OpenTelemetry infrastructure platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T19:14:21Z)
• Intelligence as Managed Autonomy: Failure, Escalation, and Governance for Agentic AI Systems [0.0]
  This paper explores the architectural vulnerability of unbounded autonomy.<n>We instantiate this theory via the SMARt model, a four-layer framework featuring Stable, Meta-cognitive, Assisted, and Regulated states.<n>We conclude that formalizing failure management within the autonomy lifecycle is a crucial step toward realizing reliable and governed artificial intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T19:49:23Z)
• From Assistance to Agency: Rethinking Autonomy and Control in CI/CD Pipelines [0.0]
  This paper presents a vision of agentic Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) in which the central challenge is not improving task performance but designing authority transfer.<n> Drawing on research prototypes and industrial platforms, we show that current systems operate mainly at the data plane under bounded autonomy.<n>We identify three recurring patterns: constrained autonomy as the dominant design, external governance as the primary safety mechanism, and a widening gap between deployment momentum and evaluation methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T00:15:43Z)
• AI Trust OS -- A Continuous Governance Framework for Autonomous AI Observability and Zero-Trust Compliance in Enterprise Environments [4.3073750462661256]
  This paper proposes AI Trust OS, a governance architecture for continuous, autonomous AI observability and zero-trust compliance.<n>The framework operates through a zero-trust telemetry boundary in which ephemeral read-only probes validate structural metadata.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T15:14:10Z)
• Clawed and Dangerous: Can We Trust Open Agentic Systems? [12.04979073308511]
  Open agentic systems combine planning with external capabilities, persistent memory, and privileged execution.<n>This paper introduces a six-dimensional analytical taxonomy and synthesizes 50 papers spanning attacks, benchmarks, defenses, audits, and adjacent engineering foundations.<n>Our review shows that the literature is relatively mature in attack characterization and benchmark construction, but remains weak in deployment controls, operational governance, persistent-memory integrity, and capability revocation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-27T09:45:12Z)
• Toward Autonomous O-RAN: A Multi-Scale Agentic AI Framework for Real-Time Network Control and Management [39.17062930275755]
  This article proposes a multi-scale agentic AI framework for Open Radio Access Networks (O-RAN)<n>It organizes RAN intelligence as a coordinated hierarchy across the Non-Real-Time (Non-RT), Near-Real-Time (Near-RT), and Real-Time (RT) control loops.<n>We show how these agents cooperate through standardized O-RAN interfaces and telemetry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-15T12:34:01Z)
• From Prompt-Response to Goal-Directed Systems: The Evolution of Agentic AI Software Architecture [0.0]
  Agentic AI denotes an architectural transition from stateless, prompt-driven generative models toward goal-directed systems.<n>This paper examines this transition by connecting intelligent agent theories, with contemporary LLM-centric approaches.<n>The study identifies a convergence toward standardized agent loops, registries, and auditable control mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T03:34:48Z)
• DRIFT: Dynamic Rule-Based Defense with Injection Isolation for Securing LLM Agents [52.92354372596197]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly central to agentic systems due to their strong reasoning and planning capabilities.<n>This interaction also introduces the risk of prompt injection attacks, where malicious inputs from external sources can mislead the agent's behavior.<n>We propose a Dynamic Rule-based Isolation Framework for Trustworthy agentic systems, which enforces both control and data-level constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T05:01:09Z)
• Generative AI for Autonomous Driving: Frontiers and Opportunities [145.6465312554513]
  This survey delivers a comprehensive synthesis of the emerging role of GenAI across the autonomous driving stack.<n>We begin by distilling the principles and trade-offs of modern generative modeling, encompassing VAEs, GANs, Diffusion Models, and Large Language Models.<n>We categorize practical applications, such as synthetic data generalization, end-to-end driving strategies, high-fidelity digital twin systems, smart transportation networks, and cross-domain transfer to embodied AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T17:59:20Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Government: Why People Feel They Lose Control [44.99833362998488]
  The use of Artificial Intelligence in public administration is expanding rapidly.<n>While AI promises greater efficiency and responsiveness, its integration into government functions raises concerns about fairness, transparency, and accountability.<n>This article applies principal-agent theory to AI adoption as a special case of delegation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T07:46:41Z)
• Cognitive Kernel: An Open-source Agent System towards Generalist Autopilots [54.55088169443828]
  We introduce Cognitive Kernel, an open-source agent system towards the goal of generalist autopilots.<n>Unlike copilot systems, which primarily rely on users to provide essential state information, autopilot systems must complete tasks independently.<n>To achieve this, an autopilot system should be capable of understanding user intents, actively gathering necessary information from various real-world sources, and making wise decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T13:39:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.