Submitted and Diagnostic Analysis of Full-Text Temporal Retrieval for LongEval-Sci
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.04088v1
- Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2026 02:52:30 GMT
- Title: Submitted and Diagnostic Analysis of Full-Text Temporal Retrieval for LongEval-Sci
- Abstract summary: LongEval-Sci evaluates scientific retrieval under collection change.<n>This paper reports both official Task 1 results and development diagnostics for LongEval-Sci 2026.
- Score: 1.0312968200748118
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: LongEval-Sci evaluates scientific retrieval under collection change, where a system should be effective on the current corpus and remain usable as documents accumulate over time. This paper reports both official Task 1 results and development diagnostics for LongEval-Sci 2026. We compare the official PyTerrier BM25 and Qwen3 dense baselines with full-text BM25, additive and router variants, temporal full-text retrieval, temporal+citation retrieval, RM3 query expansion, cross-encoder reranking, and reciprocal rank fusion (RRF). In the official DCTR evaluation, the temporalized full-text runs are our strongest submissions: FT BM25+temporal and FT BM25+temporal+citation obtain the best ARP on all three snapshots (0.285, 0.267, and 0.180 nDCG@10) and reduce snapshot-3 relative change from 0.481 for the BM25 pivot to 0.368. Citation features match the temporal-only variant but do not provide a measurable additional gain in the official summary. Our internal snapshot-1 diagnostics show a complementary pattern: full-text BM25 is the strongest single development retriever (DCTR nDCG@10 = 0.3302, MAP = 0.2853), RRF gives the best deep recall (Recall@1000 = 0.9667), and some uncalibrated overlays can sharply degrade top-rank quality. We therefore conclude that full-text retrieval is the strongest foundation, temporal integration can improve official longitudinal effectiveness when applied to that foundation, and citation evidence still requires cleaner ablation and calibration. Beyond ranking, we also report a qualitative weekly IR-system update-monitoring analysis based on ingestion velocity and stale-coverage drift.
Related papers
- Mr.LHDR: A Benchmark for Multimodal Real-World Long-Horizon Deep Research Agents [72.19038675107662]
Mr. L is a benchmark for evaluating real-world deep research over long, irreducible chains of verifiable evidence.<n>Each question is constructed from a hidden Node-Relation graph and requires an average of 12.1 necessary intermediate conclusions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-10T09:47:44Z) - PURA: Provably Unbiased and Robust Multi-Bit Watermarking for AI-Generated Text Attribution [83.66032773976904]
We present PURA, a provably unbiased and robust multi-bit watermarking method for text attribution.<n>Instead of perturbing token probabilities directly, PURA embeds payloads in the latent sampling space via keyed inverse transform sampling.<n>We show that PURA substantially outperforms existing unbiased baselines in the high-payload regime.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-23T04:44:27Z) - Test-Time Training for Zero-Resource Dense Retrieval Reranking [3.498051445282382]
Existing approaches face a fundamental dilemma: cross-encoders deliver strong reranking quality but require costly supervised training and incur high latency.<n>We propose DART (Dense Adaptive Reranking at Test-time), which resolves this dilemma by adapting the scoring function at inference time.<n>On six BEIR benchmarks, DART achieves a mean per-dataset relative NDCG@10 gain of +2.1% over the dense retrieval baseline with under 10ms additional latency per query.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-31T07:26:40Z) - A Heterogeneous Temporal Memory Governance Framework for Long-Term LLM Persona Consistency [2.447989276487424]
Large language models often suffer from fact loss, timeline confusion, persona drift, and reduced stability during long-range interaction.<n>We introduce ARPM, an external temporal memory governance framework for long-term dialogue.<n>We show that ARPM treats continuity as a traceable, auditable, and transferable governance problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-14T13:12:49Z) - From BM25 to Corrective RAG: Benchmarking Retrieval Strategies for Text-and-Table Documents [0.0]
We benchmark ten retrieval strategies spanning sparse, dense, hybrid fusion, cross-encoder reranking, query expansion, index augmentation, and adaptive retrieval.<n>We evaluate retrieval quality via Recall@k, MRR, and nDCG, and end-to-end generation quality via Number Match.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-02T07:53:40Z) - Benchmarking Real-Time Question Answering via Executable Code Workflows [15.866566641224715]
RT-QA is a dynamic evaluation framework that leverages executable code to retrieve up-to-date answers at evaluation time.<n>We construct an agent-driven pipeline that autonomously generates code for web crawling and DOM-based answer extraction.<n> RT-QA spans 12 domains with 320 Chinese questions categorized into three difficulty levels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-16T16:20:29Z) - Test-Time Strategies for More Efficient and Accurate Agentic RAG [58.44913384057518]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems face challenges with complex, multihop questions.<n>Such approaches can introduce inefficiencies, including repetitive retrieval of previously processed information.<n>We investigate test-time modifications to the Search-R1 pipeline to mitigate these identified shortcomings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-12T19:18:59Z) - Beyond Relevance: On the Relationship Between Retrieval and RAG Information Coverage [89.58253972744531]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems combine document retrieval with a generative model to address complex information seeking tasks like report generation.<n>We investigate whether upstream retrieval metrics can serve as reliable early indicators of the final generated response's information coverage.<n>Our findings demonstrate strong correlations between coverage-based retrieval metrics and nugget coverage in generated responses at both topic and system levels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-09T18:20:20Z) - FFP-300K: Scaling First-Frame Propagation for Generalizable Video Editing [97.35186681023025]
We introduce FFP-300K, a new large-scale dataset of high-fidelity video pairs at 720p resolution and 81 frames in length.<n>We propose a novel framework designed for true guidance-free FFP that resolves the tension between maintaining first-frame appearance and preserving source video motion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-05T01:46:22Z) - ModernBERT + ColBERT: Enhancing biomedical RAG through an advanced re-ranking retriever [0.5371337604556311]
We develop a lightweight ModernBERT bidirectional encoder for efficient initial candidate retrieval with a ColBERTv2 late-interaction model for fine-grained re-ranking.<n>Our analysis of the retriever module confirmed the positive impact of the ColBERT re-ranker, which improved Recall@3 by up to 4.2 percentage points.<n>Our ablation studies reveal that this performance is critically dependent on a joint fine-tuning process that aligns the retriever and re-ranker.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T12:34:55Z) - Shall We Pretrain Autoregressive Language Models with Retrieval? A
Comprehensive Study [115.96080028033904]
We study a scalable pre-trained retrieval-augmented LM (i.e., RETRO) compared with standard GPT and retrieval-augmented GPT.
Our findings highlight the promising direction of pretraining autoregressive LMs with retrieval as future foundation models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-13T18:04:19Z) - Retrieval-based Disentangled Representation Learning with Natural
Language Supervision [61.75109410513864]
We present Vocabulary Disentangled Retrieval (VDR), a retrieval-based framework that harnesses natural language as proxies of the underlying data variation to drive disentangled representation learning.
Our approach employ a bi-encoder model to represent both data and natural language in a vocabulary space, enabling the model to distinguish intrinsic dimensions that capture characteristics within data through its natural language counterpart, thus disentanglement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-15T10:20:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.