Mr.LHDR: A Benchmark for Multimodal Real-World Long-Horizon Deep Research Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11318v2
• Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 08:39:34 GMT
• Title: Mr.LHDR: A Benchmark for Multimodal Real-World Long-Horizon Deep Research Agents
• Abstract summary: Mr. L is a benchmark for evaluating real-world deep research over long, irreducible chains of verifiable evidence.<n>Each question is constructed from a hidden Node-Relation graph and requires an average of 12.1 necessary intermediate conclusions.
• Score: 72.19038675107662
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep research agents are increasingly capable of web search, tool use, multimodal evidence analysis, and information synthesis. However, existing benchmarks mainly evaluate medium-horizon exploration and rarely test whether agents can sustain long, dependency-heavy research processes. We introduce Mr. LHDR (Multimodal real-world Long-Horizon Deep Research), a benchmark for evaluating real-world deep research over long, irreducible chains of interdependent evidence across eight categories. Each question is constructed from a hidden Node-Relation graph and requires an average of 12.1 necessary intermediate conclusions with a mean dependency depth of 10.4 before reaching a short, unique, and verifiable answer. Questions incorporate multimodal evidence, including images, maps, PDFs, logos, charts, tables, and video frames, with at least one non-text element that changes the reasoning state. Mr. LHDR evaluates both final answers and the correctness of intermediate conclusions under annotated dependencies. We evaluate general models, deep research systems, and agent frameworks using Overall Accuracy (OA), Strict Accuracy (SA), Checklist Score (CS), and Dependency-Aware Checklist Score (DACS). Results show that even the strongest system achieves only 43.1% OA and 34.3% SA, indicating that final-answer accuracy substantially overestimates complete research success. Removing images reduces DACS by 12.6 points, demonstrating the importance of multimodal evidence, while SA consistently declines as reasoning chains become longer. These findings reveal sustained, dependency-consistent evidence integration, rather than isolated fact retrieval, as a key bottleneck for current deep research agents.

Related papers

• Diagnosing Search Behavior and Failure Modes in Long-Horizon Search Agents [63.2133766267587]
  Deep search agents answer difficult information-seeking questions by iteratively issuing search queries to gather supporting evidence.<n>We study these questions through a trajectory-level diagnosis of long-horizon search agents.<n>We evaluate the evidence retrieved at each search step and separate two stages of agent behavior: what evidence an agent retrieves and how effectively it uses that evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T08:46:48Z)
• HiEviDR-Bench: A Benchmark for Hierarchical Evidence Aggregation in Deep Research [52.87128503345243]
  We introduce HiEviDR-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating Hierarchical Evidence Aggregation in Deep Research.<n>HiEviDR-Bench represents each instance with an explicit evidence graph that captures evidence selection, cross-source linking, and aggregation.<n>We develop a traceability-oriented evaluation framework with five dimensions: report quality, evidence traceability, citation accuracy, claim verification, and answer correctness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-27T23:50:46Z)
• Towards Verifiable Multimodal Deep Research: A Multi-Agent Harness for Interleaved Report Generation [74.0621258662676]
  We propose Ptah, a multi-agent harness for interleaved report generation.<n>Ptah orchestrates the lifecycle from user query to rendered web report through planning, research, and writing stages.<n>A verifier agent serves as the harness's acceptance function, enforcing factual grounding, citation fidelity, and cross-modal consistency throughout the workflow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T12:40:34Z)
• MiroEval: Benchmarking Multimodal Deep Research Agents in Process and Outcome [109.15093810810214]
  MiroEval is a benchmark and evaluation framework for deep research systems.<n>The benchmark comprises 100 tasks grounded in real user needs.<n>The proposed evaluation suite assesses deep research systems along three complementary dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-30T13:16:03Z)
• MMDeepResearch-Bench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Deep Research Agents [37.98503734345155]
  We introduce MMDeepResearch-Bench (MMDR-Bench), a benchmark of 140 expert-crafted tasks across 21 domains.<n>Compared to prior setups, MMDR-Bench emphasizes report-style synthesis with explicit evidence use.<n>We propose a unified, interpretable evaluation pipeline: Formula-LLM Adaptive Evaluation (FLAE) for report quality, Trustworthy Retrieval-Aligned Citation Evaluation (TRACE) for citation-grounded evidence alignment, and Multimodal Support-Aligned Integrity Check (MOSAIC) for text-visual integrity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T10:41:33Z)
• Characterizing Deep Research: A Benchmark and Formal Definition [24.523394260858822]
  We propose a formal characterization of the deep research (DR) task and introduce a benchmark to evaluate the performance of DR systems.<n>We argue that the core defining feature of deep research is not the production of lengthy report-style outputs, but rather the high fan-out over concepts required during the search process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T08:09:28Z)
• Benchmarking Deep Search over Heterogeneous Enterprise Data [73.55304268238474]
  We present a new benchmark for evaluating a form of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)<n>RAG requires source-aware, multi-hop reasoning over diverse, sparsed, but related sources.<n>We build it using a synthetic data pipeline that simulates business across product planning, development, and support stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T08:34:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.