A Comprehensive Study of Implementation Bugs in Multi-modal Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.04974v1
• Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 12:04:49 GMT
• Title: A Comprehensive Study of Implementation Bugs in Multi-modal Agents
• Abstract summary: Multi-Modal Agents (M-agents) excel in various complex, open-world scenarios such as autonomous driving and robotics.<n>Their unique requirements to interact with dynamic and diverse multi-modal environments introduce novel implementation challenges.<n>Despite growing study on agent issues, there has not been a systematic study focusing on M-agent-specific implementation bugs.
• Score: 21.467911257264735
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multi-Modal Agents (M-agents), empowered by Large Language Models (LLMs), excel in various complex, open-world scenarios such as autonomous driving and robotics. However, their unique requirements to interact with dynamic and diverse multi-modal environments introduce novel implementation challenges beyond those faced by traditional agents. Outdated perception, untrustworthy planning and inapplicable execution could cause traffic accident and financial loss. Despite growing study on agent issues, there has not been a systematic study focusing on M-agent-specific implementation bugs. To address this gap, we conducted the first systematic study of implementation bugs in M-agents. We collected 34 representative M-agents from diverse sources and, through meticulous filtering,identified 158 M-agent-specific bugs from 1,268 issue reports. Using a top-down strategy, we developed a comprehensive taxonomy that classifies bugs by global symptoms, functionality component-level symptoms, and root causes. We then implemented MATester, an automatic proof-of-concept bug identifier by analyzing runtime inter-component outputs. When applied to 12 extra M-agents, MATester successfully covered 61.4% of known open issues and discovered 31 additional bugs, demonstrating the practical usefulness of our study. Our work provides a comprehensive reference and guideline for classification, prevention and fix of M-agent bugs.

Related papers

• Dissecting Bug Triggers and Failure Modes in Modern Agentic Frameworks: An Empirical Study [7.316203223478012]
  We conduct a comprehensive study of 409 fixed bugs from five representative agentic frameworks.<n>We identify agent-specific root causes, including modelrelated faults, cognitive context mismanagement, and orchestration faults.<n>Our findings facilitate cross-platform testing and improve the reliability of agentic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-10T03:13:24Z)
• OMNI-LEAK: Orchestrator Multi-Agent Network Induced Data Leakage [59.3826294523924]
  We investigate the security vulnerabilities of a popular multi-agent pattern known as the orchestrator setup.<n>We report the susceptibility of frontier models to different categories of attacks, finding that both reasoning and non-reasoning models are vulnerable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T21:32:32Z)
• Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation [87.47155146067962]
  We provide a standardized evaluation harness that orchestrates parallel evaluations across hundreds of tasks.<n>We conduct three-dimensional analysis spanning models, scaffolds, and benchmarks.<n>Our analysis reveals surprising insights, such as higher reasoning effort reducing accuracy in the majority of runs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T22:22:28Z)
• Can an Individual Manipulate the Collective Decisions of Multi-Agents? [53.01767232004823]
  M-Spoiler is a framework that simulates agent interactions within a multi-agent system to generate adversarial samples.<n>M-Spoiler introduces a stubborn agent that actively aids in optimizing adversarial samples.<n>Our findings confirm the risks posed by the knowledge of an individual agent in multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-20T01:54:20Z)
• Chain-of-Agents: End-to-End Agent Foundation Models via Multi-Agent Distillation and Agentic RL [41.847359443133776]
  Chain-of-Agents (CoA) is a novel paradigm of large language models (LLMs) reasoning that enables native end-to-end complex problem-solving.<n>We introduce a multi-agent distillation framework to distill state-of-the-art multi-agent systems into chain-of-agents trajectories for agentic supervised fine-tuning.<n>We then use agentic reinforcement learning on verifiable agentic tasks to further improve the models' capabilities on chain-of-agents problem solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T17:01:02Z)
• Can Agents Fix Agent Issues? [15.50260831159089]
  LLM-based agent systems are emerging as a new software paradigm and have been widely adopted across diverse domains such as medicine, robotics, and programming.<n>Maintaining these systems requires substantial effort, as they are inevitably prone to bugs and continually evolve to meet changing external requirements.<n>Recent software engineering (SE) agents have shown promise in addressing issues in traditional software systems, but it remains unclear how effectively they can resolve real-world issues in agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T05:45:03Z)
• Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systems [50.29939179830491]
  Failure attribution in LLM multi-agent systems remains underexplored and labor-intensive.<n>We develop and evaluate three automated failure attribution methods, summarizing their corresponding pros and cons.<n>The best method achieves 53.5% accuracy in identifying failure-responsible agents but only 14.2% in pinpointing failure steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T23:09:44Z)
• Preventing Rogue Agents Improves Multi-Agent Collaboration [21.955058255432974]
  We propose to monitor agents during action prediction and intervene when a future error is likely to occur.<n>Experiments on WhoDunitEnv, code generation tasks and the GovSim environment for resource sustainability show that our approach leads to substantial performance gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T18:35:08Z)
• On the Resilience of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration with Faulty Agents [58.79302663733703]
  Large language model-based multi-agent systems have shown great abilities across various tasks due to the collaboration of expert agents.<n>The impact of clumsy or even malicious agents--those who frequently make errors in their tasks--on the overall performance of the system remains underexplored.<n>This paper investigates what is the resilience of various system structures under faulty agents on different downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T03:25:20Z)
• On the Use and Misuse of Absorbing States in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning [55.95253619768565]
  Current MARL algorithms assume that the number of agents within a group remains fixed throughout an experiment. In many practical problems, an agent may terminate before their teammates. We present a novel architecture for an existing state-of-the-art MARL algorithm which uses attention instead of a fully connected layer with absorbing states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-10T23:45:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.