Collaborative Multi-Agent Testing for Emergent Failure Discovery in Autonomous Driving Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06078v1
- Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 09:47:18 GMT
- Title: Collaborative Multi-Agent Testing for Emergent Failure Discovery in Autonomous Driving Systems
- Abstract summary: CREAD is a collaborative multi-agent testing framework for testing Autonomous Driving Systems.<n>It organises perturbation generation, behavioural validation, and search coordination through a shared blackboard and an orchestrator.
- Score: 11.912499342650854
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Autonomous Driving Systems (ADS) can fail because of faults within individual modules as well as from interactions across perception, planning, and control. Yet existing ADS testing research often treats key testing functions, such as perturbation generation, behavioural assessment, and test case selection and exploration, as loosely coupled steps rather than coordinated roles for discovering such failures. We present CREAD, a collaborative multi-agent testing framework for testing ADS that organises perturbation generation, behavioural validation, and search coordination through a shared blackboard and an orchestrator. In the current work-in-progress instantiation, the framework focuses on perception-oriented perturbation generation, while remaining extensible to other ADS modules, including planning and control. It currently comprises a Perception Fuzzer Agent, a Metamorphic Validator Agent, and an Orchestrator Agent. Respectively, they generate perturbations, assess behavioural consistency across related scenario pairs, and coordinate further exploration. Experiments in HighwayEnv simulator show that the collaborative configuration improves failure discovery in the highway environment and remains competitive in the roundabout setting. Across the two environments, it yields about 2.1x as many failures per 100 scenarios as the single-agent baseline on average, while gains over a non-collaborative two-agent baseline vary across environments. These results suggest that collaborative multi-agent testing is a promising research direction for emergent ADS behaviour discovery.
Related papers
- Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems [65.90791804095561]
Multi-agent systems address this through structured collaboration among specialized agents, but tighter coordination amplifies a less explored risk.<n>Existing surveys cover individual agent capabilities, multi-agent collaboration, or agent self-evolution separately, leaving the causal dependencies among them unexamined.<n>This survey provides a unified review organized around four causally linked stages, which we term the LIFE progression: Lay the capability foundation, Integrate agents through collaboration, Find faults through attribution, and Evolve through autonomous self-improvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-14T14:36:13Z) - Towards a Virtual Neuroscientist: Autonomous Neuroimaging Analysis via Multi-Agent Collaboration [53.772014300855375]
We introduce NIAgent, a multi-agent system for autonomous end-to-end neuroimaging analysis.<n>Unlike conventional flat tool-calling agents, NIAgent adopts a code-centric execution paradigm.<n>We propose a hierarchical verification framework for autonomous quality control, integrating cohort-level metric screening with agentic visual inspection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-10T06:30:19Z) - Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment [59.536125286960186]
Multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing.<n>We find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry.<n>ReTAS guides agents to synthesize conflicting viewpoints into an objective consensus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-21T15:05:58Z) - AffectAgent: Collaborative Multi-Agent Reasoning for Retrieval-Augmented Multimodal Emotion Recognition [62.16431420189863]
LLM-based multimodal emotion recognition relies on static parametric memory and often hallucinates when interpreting nuanced affective states.<n>We introduce AffectAgent, an affect-oriented multi-agent retrieval-augmented generation framework.<n>AffectAgent comprises three jointly optimized agents, namely a query planner, an evidence filter, and an emotion generator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-14T13:49:19Z) - Dynasto: Validity-Aware Dynamic-Static Parameter Optimization for Autonomous Driving Testing [6.969678532857503]
We propose Dynasto, a two-step testing approach to uncover safety-critical failures in autonomous driving systems.<n>First, we train an adversarial agent using reinforcement learning with temporal-logic-based validity criteria.<n>Second, a genetic algorithm searches over initial conditions while replaying the adversary's failure-inducing behaviors to reveal additional failures that the RL agent alone does not uncover.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-22T22:35:30Z) - Beyond Monolithic Architectures: A Multi-Agent Search and Knowledge Optimization Framework for Agentic Search [56.78490647843876]
Agentic search has emerged as a promising paradigm for complex information seeking by enabling Large Language Models (LLMs) to interleave reasoning with tool use.<n>We propose bfM-ASK, a framework that explicitly decouples agentic search into two complementary roles: Search Behavior Agents, which plan and execute search actions, and Knowledge Management Agents, which aggregate, filter, and maintain a compact internal context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-08T08:13:27Z) - From MAS to MARS: Coordination Failures and Reasoning Trade-offs in Hierarchical Multi-Agent Robotic Systems within a Healthcare Scenario [3.5262044630932254]
Multi-agent robotic systems (MARS) build upon multi-agent systems by integrating physical and task-related constraints.<n>Despite the availability of advanced multi-agent frameworks, their real-world deployment on robots remains limited.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-06T17:54:10Z) - Preventing Rogue Agents Improves Multi-Agent Collaboration [21.955058255432974]
We propose to monitor agents during action prediction and intervene when a future error is likely to occur.<n>Experiments on WhoDunitEnv, code generation tasks and the GovSim environment for resource sustainability show that our approach leads to substantial performance gains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-09T18:35:08Z) - Using Cooperative Co-evolutionary Search to Generate Metamorphic Test Cases for Autonomous Driving Systems [7.519606883700972]
This paper introduces CoCoMEGA, a novel automated testing framework aimed at advancing system-level safety assessments of Autonomous Driving Systems (ADSs)<n>CoCoMEGA emphasizes the identification of test scenarios that present undesirable system behavior, that may eventually lead to safety violations, captured by Metamorphic Relations (MRs)<n>Future research directions may include extending the approach to additional simulation platforms, applying it to other complex systems, and exploring methods for further improving testing efficiency such as surrogate modeling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-05T03:17:31Z) - Interactive Autonomous Navigation with Internal State Inference and
Interactivity Estimation [58.21683603243387]
We propose three auxiliary tasks with relational-temporal reasoning and integrate them into the standard Deep Learning framework.
These auxiliary tasks provide additional supervision signals to infer the behavior patterns other interactive agents.
Our approach achieves robust and state-of-the-art performance in terms of standard evaluation metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-27T18:57:42Z) - A Framework for Automatic Behavior Generation in Multi-Function Swarms [1.290382979353427]
A framework for automatic behavior generation in multi-function swarms is proposed.
The framework is tested on a scenario with three simultaneous tasks.
The effect of noise on the behavior characteristics in MAP-elites is investigated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-11T20:50:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.