Pluralis v0.1: Towards a Multicultural, Multimodal, Multilingual Benchmark for AI Risk and Reliability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06196v1
• Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 12:21:52 GMT
• Title: Pluralis v0.1: Towards a Multicultural, Multimodal, Multilingual Benchmark for AI Risk and Reliability
• Abstract summary: Current AI safety evaluation and benchmarking frameworks rely on Western-centric culture-agnostic defaults that mask critical regional laws, socio-linguistic nuances, and cultural taboos.<n>We introduce Pluralis v0.1: a novel multimodal, multi-regional, and multilingual dataset built from a culture-first perspective.
• Score: 46.80780735011334
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Current AI safety evaluation and benchmarking frameworks predominantly rely on Western-centric culture-agnostic defaults that mask critical regional laws, socio-linguistic nuances, and cultural taboos, leaving Vision-Language Models (VLMs) vulnerable in global deployments. We introduce Pluralis v0.1: a novel multimodal, multi-regional, and multilingual dataset built from a culture-first perspective. Spanning 6,448 prompts across six Asia-Pacific countries (Bangladesh, India, Korea, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan) and eight languages, Pluralis diverges from prior work by natively sourcing localized safety hazards rather than adapting Western datasets. Crucially, it introduces a multimodal evaluation paradigm: user text (e.g., "Should I gift this?") and an image referring to "this" (e.g., a clock) - both innocuous in isolation, but synergistically triggering specific legal or cultural violations. Pluralis disentangles universal safety violations from localized cultural appropriateness, establishing the latter as a first-class evaluation axis. To operationalize this, we present Judge-Pluralis, an agreement-gated LLM-as-a-Judge ensemble trained on examples classified in an empirically derived cultural taxonomy. Observing VLM behavior on a subset of the Pluralis surfaces recurring, locale-specific failure modes such as image misidentifications with downstream harm, missed item-context-locale interactions, and inadequate refusals. These failure modes vary systematically across locales and languages, exposing blind spots that globally averaged metrics conceal. Ultimately, Pluralis is not presented as a solved evaluation framework for cultural alignment, but rather as a first step and catalyst for future innovation. We call upon the research community to utilize this foundation to advance the science of multilingual, multicultural evaluation to better support AI cultural alignment globally.

Related papers

• Beyond Cross-Lingual Transfer: Benchmarking Propagation Boundaries in Multilingual LLM Unlearning [80.05116806217397]
  Large Language Model (LLM) unlearning aims to suppress target knowledge while preserving general capabilities.<n>We introduce CLLPU (Cross-Lingual and Language-Bound Protocol for LLM Unlearning), a multilingual benchmark that formulates this problem through two settings.<n>Common-goal forgetting, where target knowledge should be suppressed across all languages, and language-conditioned forgetting, where suppression should remain confined to a designated language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-05T08:26:15Z)
• CultureForest: Understanding and Evaluating Cultural Norm Grounded Reasoning in LLMs [59.09971492475217]
  We introduce CultureForest, a benchmark for textitCultural Norm Grounded Reasoning<n>CultureForest comprises 5,378 examples across 8 domains and 53 countries/regions.<n>Extensive experiments reveal that even top-tier models degrade substantially in open-ended settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T08:25:12Z)
• When English Rewrites Local Knowledge: Global Narrative Dominance in Large Language Models [17.6283905669333]
  Large language models (LLMs) are widely used as cross-lingual knowledge interfaces.<n>Culturally grounded questions often reflect globally dominant narratives rather than local contexts.<n>We introduce textttCulturalNB, a dataset of 717 manually curated Bengali cultural instances with parallel Bangla--English question--answer pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T18:58:32Z)
• Multilingual Refusal Alignment for Safer Large Language Models [53.64286756804503]
  We investigate whether single-language alignment transfers cross-lingually, how language consistency is preserved during training, and the resulting trade-offs with general knowledge capabilities.<n>We introduce RefusEU, a novel refusal alignment dataset covering 12 European languages, including a dedicated test set for evaluating current state-of-the-art models.<n>Our controlled Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) experiments provide two key insights: aligning models exclusively in English is insufficient to ensure cross-lingual safety, even for the same harm categories, whereas training on multilingual datasets can improve safety without degrading general performance, as measured by the Global MMLU benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T09:29:14Z)
• Mitigating Cross-Lingual Cultural Inconsistencies in LLMs via Consensus-Driven Preference Optimisation [58.01855677487771]
  We show that multilingual large language models (MLLMs) frequently exhibit inconsistent behaviour when the prompt's language changes.<n>We propose Cross-lingual Cultural Consistent Preference optimisation (C-3PO), a consensus-driven alignment framework.<n>C-3PO achieves up to a 0.10-point absolute increase in $_S$ over unaligned models, outperforming strong prompting and representation steering baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T14:04:06Z)
• Mind the Gap: Pitfalls of LLM Alignment with Asian Public Opinion [8.443928474148114]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being deployed in multilingual, multicultural settings.<n>Our study specifically focuses on the sensitive domain of religion as the prism for broader alignment.<n>We find that while the popular models generally align with public opinion on broad social issues, they consistently fail to accurately represent religious viewpoints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-06T13:29:54Z)
• I Am Aligned, But With Whom? MENA Values Benchmark for Evaluating Cultural Alignment and Multilingual Bias in LLMs [5.060243371992739]
  We introduce MENAValues, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the cultural alignment and multilingual biases of large language models (LLMs)<n> Drawing from large-scale, authoritative human surveys, we curate a structured dataset that captures the sociocultural landscape of MENA with population-level response distributions from 16 countries.<n>Our analysis reveals three critical phenomena: "Cross-Lingual Value Shifts" where identical questions yield drastically different responses based on language, "Reasoning-Induced Degradation" where prompting models to explain their reasoning worsens cultural alignment, and "Logit Leakage" where models refuse sensitive questions while internal probabilities reveal strong hidden
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T05:10:57Z)
• MMA-ASIA: A Multilingual and Multimodal Alignment Framework for Culturally-Grounded Evaluation [91.22008265721952]
  MMA-ASIA centers on a human-curated, multilingual, and multimodally aligned benchmark covering 8 Asian countries and 10 languages.<n>This is the first dataset aligned at the input level across three modalities: text, image (visual question answering), and speech.<n>We propose a five-dimensional evaluation protocol that measures: (i) cultural-awareness disparities across countries, (ii) cross-lingual consistency, (iii) cross-modal consistency, (iv) cultural knowledge generalization, and (v) grounding validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T14:12:12Z)
• Which Cultural Lens Do Models Adopt? On Cultural Positioning Bias and Agentic Mitigation in LLMs [53.07843733899881]
  Large language models (LLMs) have unlocked a wide range of downstream generative applications.<n>We find that they also risk perpetuating subtle fairness issues tied to culture, positioning their generations from the perspectives of the mainstream US culture.<n>We propose 2 inference-time mitigation methods to resolve these biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T12:28:25Z)
• SESGO: Spanish Evaluation of Stereotypical Generative Outputs [1.1549572298362782]
  This paper addresses the critical gap in evaluating bias in multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Current evaluations remain predominantly US-English-centric, leaving potential harms in other linguistic and cultural contexts largely underexamined.<n>We introduce a novel, culturally-grounded framework for detecting social biases in instruction-tuned LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T14:04:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.