UASPL: Uncertainty-Aware Self-Paced Learning with Evidential Neural Networks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06638v1
- Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 14:31:59 GMT
- Title: UASPL: Uncertainty-Aware Self-Paced Learning with Evidential Neural Networks
- Abstract summary: This article proposes an uncertainty-aware self-paced learning based on evidential neural networks, termed UASPL.<n>It integrates predictive reliability into sample selection through a general loss function within the Subjective Logic framework.<n>The experimental results on multiple datasets show that UASPL outperforms other SPL methods in terms of classification performance, interpretability, and generality.
- Score: 17.74877274146883
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Self-paced learning (SPL) is an effective learning paradigm that simulates the human learning process by progressing from easy to difficult samples based on the value of the loss function during the learning process. It has shown great potential in improving model performance and training efficiency. However, the prediction results of samples with smaller loss values are not necessarily reliable, indicating that such samples are not always simple samples for the model. Hence, this article proposes an uncertainty-aware self-paced learning based on evidential neural networks, termed UASPL, which integrates predictive reliability into sample selection through a general loss function within the Subjective Logic framework. This loss function incorporates uncertainty estimation and can be extended to different variants of SPL. Moreover, this loss function couples a sample selection preference, thereby ensuring the interpretability of the sample selection process. Finally, the experimental results on multiple datasets show that UASPL outperforms other SPL methods in terms of classification performance, interpretability, and generality. The source code is available at: https://github.com/treelife979/UASPL.
Related papers
- Should I Use This Synthetic Dataset for Training? How to Test with Minimal Real Data [73.19814469893088]
Digital twins and learned world models are increasingly used to generate synthetic data that augment the scarce real datasets available for training artificial intelligence (AI) models in engineering systems.<n>This paper addresses whether training on the augmented dataset improves the true, population-level performance, while consuming as few real test data points as possible.<n>Experiments on a synthetic-data classification task, a DT-aided wireless packet-scheduling task, and a radio-map prediction task show that aeSFT identifies useful synthetic data using substantially fewer real test samples than mean-based sequential testing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-28T07:05:38Z) - Quantifying the Prediction Uncertainty of Machine Learning Models for Individual Data [2.1248439796866228]
This study investigates pNML's learnability for linear regression and neural networks.<n>It demonstrates that pNML can improve the performance and robustness of these models on various tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-10T13:58:19Z) - Dissecting Representation Misalignment in Contrastive Learning via Influence Function [15.28417468377201]
We introduce the Extended Influence Function for Contrastive Loss (ECIF), an influence function crafted for contrastive loss.<n>ECIF considers both positive and negative samples and provides a closed-form approximation of contrastive learning models.<n>Building upon ECIF, we develop a series of algorithms for data evaluation, misalignment detection, and misprediction trace-back tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-18T15:45:41Z) - Understanding Uncertainty-based Active Learning Under Model Mismatch [16.361254095103615]
Uncertainty-based Active Learning (UAL) operates by querying the label(s) of pivotal samples from an unlabeled pool selected based on the prediction uncertainty.
The efficacy of UAL depends on the model capacity as well as the adopted uncertainty-based acquisition function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-24T23:37:08Z) - Provably Neural Active Learning Succeeds via Prioritizing Perplexing Samples [53.95282502030541]
Neural Network-based active learning (NAL) is a cost-effective data selection technique that utilizes neural networks to select and train on a small subset of samples.
We try to move one step forward by offering a unified explanation for the success of both query criteria-based NAL from a feature learning view.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T10:38:01Z) - Querying Easily Flip-flopped Samples for Deep Active Learning [63.62397322172216]
Active learning is a machine learning paradigm that aims to improve the performance of a model by strategically selecting and querying unlabeled data.
One effective selection strategy is to base it on the model's predictive uncertainty, which can be interpreted as a measure of how informative a sample is.
This paper proposes the it least disagree metric (LDM) as the smallest probability of disagreement of the predicted label.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-18T08:12:23Z) - Boosting Differentiable Causal Discovery via Adaptive Sample Reweighting [62.23057729112182]
Differentiable score-based causal discovery methods learn a directed acyclic graph from observational data.
We propose a model-agnostic framework to boost causal discovery performance by dynamically learning the adaptive weights for the Reweighted Score function, ReScore.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-06T14:49:59Z) - Temporal Output Discrepancy for Loss Estimation-based Active Learning [65.93767110342502]
We present a novel deep active learning approach that queries the oracle for data annotation when the unlabeled sample is believed to incorporate high loss.
Our approach achieves superior performances than the state-of-the-art active learning methods on image classification and semantic segmentation tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-20T19:29:37Z) - A Fair Loss Function for Network Pruning [70.35230425589592]
We introduce the performance weighted loss function, a simple modified cross-entropy loss function that can be used to limit the introduction of biases during pruning.
Experiments using the CelebA, Fitzpatrick17k and CIFAR-10 datasets demonstrate that the proposed method is a simple and effective tool.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-18T15:17:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.