Healthier LLMs: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Public Health Question Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06641v1
• Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 14:47:42 GMT
• Title: Healthier LLMs: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Public Health Question Answering
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) achieve promising results on medical question answering benchmarks, yet their use in public health is constrained by hallucinations.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates these risks by grounding responses in an explicitly maintained corpus.<n>We extend PubHealthBench, a question answering benchmark of 7,929 questions derived from UK Government public health guidance, into a retrieval-augmented setting.
• Score: 0.49684308102851493
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) achieve promising results on medical question answering benchmarks, yet their use in public health is constrained by hallucinations and the rapid evolution of official guidance. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates these risks by grounding responses in an explicitly maintained corpus, but end-to-end performance depends critically on retrieval configuration and on evaluation beyond multiple-choice formats. We extend PubHealthBench, a question answering (QA) benchmark of 7,929 questions derived from UK Government public health guidance, into a retrieval-augmented setting and systematically evaluate retrieval and generation choices. We compare dense, sparse, and hybrid retrieval across multiple embedding models and corpus variants, and show that hybrid retrieval consistently improves recall and ranking quality, with chunk length and topic interacting with ranking performance. Providing retrieved context substantially increases multiple-choice accuracy across a diverse set of LLMs, enabling smaller open-weight models to match or outperform larger models used without retrieval, with gains primarily driven by retrieval quality and careful context selection. To assess realistic free-form answering, we introduce a rubric-based LLM-as-a-judge covering faithfulness, completeness, clarity, and factual consistency, and validate it against dual human annotations. Judge-human agreement is strongest for faithfulness and completeness, while factual consistency and clarity are less reliably reproduced, motivating caution when interpreting those dimensions at scale. Overall, our results highlight retrieval as a primary lever for reliable public health QA and provide practical guidance for building and evaluating RAG systems grounded in official guidance.

Related papers

• Beyond the Leaderboard: Design Lessons for Trustworthy Multimodal VQA [4.080704298118247]
  multimodal AI must combine visual and textual evidence while remaining reliable and interpretable.<n>We analyze design choices across nine documented systems for question answering and explanation quality.<n>The findings support trustworthy multimodal healthcare AI based on data fusion, explainability, and resilient evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-16T17:38:19Z)
• Boosting Self-Consistency with Ranking [56.38798757709555]
  Self-consistency improves large language models by sampling multiple reasoning paths and selecting the most frequent answer.<n>We address this limitation with Ranking-Improved Self-Consistency (RISC), which reformulates answer selection in self-consistency as a ranking problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T16:12:30Z)
• FRESCO: Benchmarking and Optimizing Re-rankers for Evolving Semantic Conflict in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [73.22935457705057]
  We introduce FRESCO, a benchmark for evaluating re-rankers in temporally dynamic contexts.<n>By pairing recency-seeking queries with historical Wikipedia revisions, FRESCO tests whether re-rankers can prioritize factually recent evidence while maintaining semantic relevance.<n>Our evaluation reveals a consistent failure mode across existing re-rankers: a strong bias toward older, semantically rich documents, even when they are factually obsolete.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T17:04:25Z)
• A Systematic Study of Retrieval Pipeline Design for Retrieval-Augmented Medical Question Answering [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in medical question answering.<n>Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) addresses this limitation by integrating external knowledge retrieval into the reasoning process.<n>This study presents a systematic evaluation of RAG-based medical question answering using the MedQA USMLE benchmark and a structured textbook-based knowledge corpus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T16:37:22Z)
• Self-MedRAG: a Self-Reflective Hybrid Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Reliable Medical Question Answering [39.146761527401424]
  Self-MedRAG is a self-reflective hybrid framework designed to mimic the iterative hypothesis-verification process of clinical reasoning.<n>It integrates a hybrid retrieval strategy, combining sparse (BM25) and dense (Contriever) retrievers via Reciprocal Rank Fusion.<n>It employs a generator to produce answers with supporting rationales, which are then assessed by a lightweight self-reflection module.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T02:56:04Z)
• Enhancing the Medical Context-Awareness Ability of LLMs via Multifaceted Self-Refinement Learning [49.559151128219725]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown great promise in the medical domain, achieving strong performance on several benchmarks.<n>However, they continue to underperform in real-world medical scenarios, which often demand stronger context-awareness.<n>We propose Multifaceted Self-Refinement (MuSeR), a data-driven approach that enhances LLMs' context-awareness along three key facets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T08:13:23Z)
• On the Influence of Context Size and Model Choice in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [5.69361786082969]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as an approach to augment large language models (LLMs)<n>We evaluate various context sizes, BM25 and semantic search as retrievers, and eight base LLMs.<n>Our findings indicate that final QA performance improves steadily with up to 15 snippets but stagnates or declines beyond that.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T17:34:34Z)
• Comprehensive and Practical Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems for Medical Question Answering [70.44269982045415]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising approach to enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs) We introduce Medical Retrieval-Augmented Generation Benchmark (MedRGB) that provides various supplementary elements to four medical QA datasets. Our experimental results reveals current models' limited ability to handle noise and misinformation in the retrieved documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T06:19:18Z)
• The Geometry of Queries: Query-Based Innovations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Healthcare QA [1.2839205715237014]
  QB-RAG is a framework for enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems in healthcare question-answering.<n>A key component of QB-RAG is an LLM-based filtering mechanism that ensures that only relevant and answerable questions are included in the database.<n>Our empirical evaluation on a healthcare data set demonstrates the superior performance of QB-RAG compared to existing retrieval methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T13:47:01Z)
• Uncertainty Estimation of Large Language Models in Medical Question Answering [60.72223137560633]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise for natural language generation in healthcare, but risk hallucinating factually incorrect information. We benchmark popular uncertainty estimation (UE) methods with different model sizes on medical question-answering datasets. Our results show that current approaches generally perform poorly in this domain, highlighting the challenge of UE for medical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T16:51:33Z)
• SeRTS: Self-Rewarding Tree Search for Biomedical Retrieval-Augmented Generation [50.26966969163348]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great potential in the biomedical domain with the advancement of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) Existing retrieval-augmented approaches face challenges in addressing diverse queries and documents, particularly for medical knowledge queries. We propose Self-Rewarding Tree Search (SeRTS) based on Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) and a self-rewarding paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T06:48:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.