Beyond the Leaderboard: Design Lessons for Trustworthy Multimodal VQA

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15241v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:38:19 GMT
• Title: Beyond the Leaderboard: Design Lessons for Trustworthy Multimodal VQA
• Abstract summary: multimodal AI must combine visual and textual evidence while remaining reliable and interpretable.<n>We analyze design choices across nine documented systems for question answering and explanation quality.<n>The findings support trustworthy multimodal healthcare AI based on data fusion, explainability, and resilient evaluation.
• Score: 4.080704298118247
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Healthcare multimodal AI must combine visual and textual evidence while remaining reliable and interpretable. Using MediaEval Medico 2025 as a retrospective GI endoscopy case study, we analyze design choices across nine documented systems for question answering and explanation quality. Parameter-efficient adaptation of pretrained backbones provides strong challenge performance, but answer-level gains do not consistently translate into faithful and complete clinical reasoning. Methods enforcing structured reasoning and explicit grounding show more reliable behavior across heterogeneous question types, although the evidence is correlational rather than ablation-based. These results motivate evaluation beyond lexical overlap, standardized evidence-linked explanations, leakage-aware data governance, and lightweight robustness and calibration checks. The findings support trustworthy multimodal healthcare AI based on data fusion, explainability, and resilient evaluation.

Related papers

• HiEviDR-Bench: A Benchmark for Hierarchical Evidence Aggregation in Deep Research [52.87128503345243]
  We introduce HiEviDR-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating Hierarchical Evidence Aggregation in Deep Research.<n>HiEviDR-Bench represents each instance with an explicit evidence graph that captures evidence selection, cross-source linking, and aggregation.<n>We develop a traceability-oriented evaluation framework with five dimensions: report quality, evidence traceability, citation accuracy, claim verification, and answer correctness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-27T23:50:46Z)
• BELIEF: Structured Evidence Modeling and Uncertainty-Aware Fusion for Biomedical Question Answering [28.39203052317792]
  BELIEF is a structured evidence modeling and uncertainty-aware fusion framework for biomedical question answering.<n>It converts retrieved documents into evidence objects that record clinical attributes, source quality, question relevance, support strength, and the associated candidate hypothesis.<n>BelIEF improves retrieved-evidence utilization by making evidence structure, path disagreement, and decision uncertainty explicit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T12:58:55Z)
• Towards Responsible Multimodal Medical Reasoning via Context-Aligned Vision-Language Models [11.019570079187552]
  Medical vision-language models (VLMs) show strong performance on radiology tasks but often produce fluent yet weakly grounded conclusions.<n>We introduce a context-aligned reasoning framework that enforces agreement across heterogeneous clinical evidence before generating diagnostic conclusions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T23:09:38Z)
• Strong Reasoning Isn't Enough: Evaluating Evidence Elicitation in Interactive Diagnosis [29.630872344186873]
  Interactive medical consultation requires an agent to proactively elicit missing clinical evidence under uncertainty.<n>Existing evaluations largely remain static or outcome-centric, neglecting the evidence-gathering process.<n>We propose an interactive evaluation framework that explicitly models the consultation process using a simulated patient and a revsimulated reporter grounded in atomic evidences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T16:36:35Z)
• AgentsEval: Clinically Faithful Evaluation of Medical Imaging Reports via Multi-Agent Reasoning [73.50200033931148]
  We introduce AgentsEval, a multi-agent stream reasoning framework that emulates the collaborative diagnostic workflow of radiologists.<n>By dividing the evaluation process into interpretable steps including criteria definition, evidence extraction, alignment, and consistency scoring, AgentsEval provides explicit reasoning traces and structured clinical feedback.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that AgentsEval delivers clinically aligned, semantically faithful, and interpretable evaluations that remain robust under paraphrastic, semantic, and stylistic perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T11:59:13Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical LLMs: Benchmarking and Enhancing Confidence Estimation of Large Language Models in Medical Consultation [97.36081721024728]
  We propose the first benchmark for assessing confidence in multi-turn interaction during realistic medical consultations.<n>Our benchmark unifies three types of medical data for open-ended diagnostic generation.<n>We present MedConf, an evidence-grounded linguistic self-assessment framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T04:51:39Z)
• S-Chain: Structured Visual Chain-of-Thought For Medicine [81.97605645734741]
  We introduce S-Chain, the first large-scale dataset of 12,000 expert-annotated medical images with bounding boxes and structured visual CoT (SV-CoT)<n>The dataset further supports 16 languages, totaling over 700k VQA pairs for broad multilingual applicability.<n>S-Chain establishes a new benchmark for grounded medical reasoning and paves the way toward more trustworthy and explainable medical vision-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-26T15:57:14Z)
• MedAlign: A Synergistic Framework of Multimodal Preference Optimization and Federated Meta-Cognitive Reasoning [52.064286116035134]
  We develop MedAlign, a framework to ensure visually accurate LVLM responses for Medical Visual Question Answering (Med-VQA)<n>We first propose a multimodal Direct Preference Optimization (mDPO) objective to align preference learning with visual context.<n>We then design a Retrieval-Aware Mixture-of-Experts (RA-MoE) architecture that utilizes image and text similarity to route queries to a specialized and context-augmented LVLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T02:11:05Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models for Evidence-Based Clinical Question Answering [4.101088122511548]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial progress in biomedical and clinical applications.<n>We curate a benchmark drawing from Cochrane systematic reviews and clinical guidelines.<n>We observe consistent performance patterns across sources and clinical domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-13T15:03:34Z)
• Knowing or Guessing? Robust Medical Visual Question Answering via Joint Consistency and Contrastive Learning [34.6490677122246]
  We show that current Medical Vision-Language Models (Med-VLMs) exhibit concerning fragility in Medical Visual Question Answering.<n>We propose Consistency and Contrastive Learning (CCL), which integrates knowledge-anchored consistency learning and bias-aware contrastive learning.<n>CCL achieves SOTA performance on three popular VQA benchmarks and notably improves answer consistency by 50% on the challenging RoMed test set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T05:21:19Z)
• Uncertainty-Driven Expert Control: Enhancing the Reliability of Medical Vision-Language Models [52.2001050216955]
  Existing methods aim to enhance the performance of Medical Vision Language Model (MedVLM) by adjusting model structure, fine-tuning with high-quality data, or through preference fine-tuning.<n>We propose an expert-in-the-loop framework named Expert-Controlled-Free Guidance (Expert-CFG) to align MedVLM with clinical expertise without additional training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-12T09:03:30Z)
• GEMeX-RMCoT: An Enhanced Med-VQA Dataset for Region-Aware Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [60.03671205298294]
  Medical visual question answering aims to support clinical decision-making by enabling models to answer natural language questions based on medical images.<n>Current methods still suffer from limited answer reliability and poor interpretability.<n>This work first proposes a Region-Aware Multimodal Chain-of-Thought dataset, in which the process of producing an answer is preceded by a sequence of intermediate reasoning steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T08:09:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.