BUS: Brain-Inspired Unsupervised Self-Reflection via Backward Prediction for Multimodal Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07361v2
• Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:24:37 GMT
• Title: BUS: Brain-Inspired Unsupervised Self-Reflection via Backward Prediction for Multimodal Reasoning
• Abstract summary: Current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) often struggle to handle complex visual tasks that require consistent and fine-grained reasoning.<n>Recent methods aim to train models to facilitate self-reflective reasoning, i.e., reviewing and improving the generated reasoning.<n>By contrast, humans perform explicit and efficient self-reflection through mechanisms such as backward prediction.
• Score: 24.83825156656872
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) often struggle to handle complex visual tasks that require consistent and fine-grained reasoning. Recent methods aim to train models to facilitate self-reflective reasoning, i.e., reviewing and improving the generated reasoning. However, they require large volumes of annotated data and lack explicit reflective behavior during test time. By contrast, humans perform explicit and efficient self-reflection through mechanisms such as backward prediction, i.e., predicting which current states are likely to precede a given future state. Inspired by neuroscience, this work proposes a novel solution to address these challenges. We first observe and investigate the phenomenon that mainstream VLMs can perform backward prediction, similar to the human brain. A label-free training framework named Brain-inspired Unsupervised Self-reflection (BUS) is proposed to leverage and exploit backward prediction capability to enhance reflective reasoning in complex visual tasks. BUS enables self-verification of reflective reasoning based on backward prediction, providing explicit learning signals under unsupervised conditions. In this way, BUS eliminates reliance on annotated data while improving reasoning performance. Designed as a model-agnostic plug-in, our framework is compatible with popular fine-tuning methods, such as Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL). Initialized from Qwen3-VL-8B, it improves HR-Bench-8K (+8.0%), HR-Bench-4K (+7.7%), V* Bench (+6.3%), and MME-RealWorld-Lite (+5.8%), proving backward prediction is key to advancing reflective reasoning.

Related papers

• Learn to Think: Improving Multimodal Reasoning through Vision-Aware Self-Improvement Training [82.17582358979884]
  Post-training with explicit reasoning traces is common to improve the reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>We propose VISTA, a vision-aware self-improvement training framework for enhancing the multimodal reasoning of MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T10:44:35Z)
• V-ABS: Action-Observer Driven Beam Search for Dynamic Visual Reasoning [7.200097753831728]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable success in general perception, yet complex multi-step visual reasoning remains a persistent challenge.<n>We introduce V-ABS, an action-observer driven beam search framework that enables deliberate reasoning through thinker-actor-observer iterations.<n>We show that V-ABS achieves state-of-the-art performance, delivering an average improvement of 19.7% on the Qwen3-VL-8B baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T08:21:52Z)
• Reflect to Inform: Boosting Multimodal Reasoning via Information-Gain-Driven Verification [55.357038267439684]
  Visual Re-Examination (VRE) is a self-evolving training framework that enables MLLMs to autonomously perform visual introspection during reasoning without additional visual inputs.<n>VRE consistently improves reasoning accuracy and perceptual reliability, while substantially reducing hallucinations, especially in long-chain settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-27T12:22:13Z)
• First Try Matters: Revisiting the Role of Reflection in Reasoning Models [66.39546876232512]
  We focus on reflective behaviours where the model has already produced an answer but continues reflecting before finalizing its output.<n>Our analysis reveals that reflections are predominantly confirmatory and rarely alter the model's initial answer.<n>We propose a question-aware early-stopping method that enhances inference-time token efficiency by stopping the reasoning process once a few plausible candidate answers are generated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T14:57:10Z)
• Efficient Reasoning Through Suppression of Self-Affirmation Reflections in Large Reasoning Models [29.615519143908998]
  Self-affirmation reflections are redundant reflective steps that affirm prior content and often occur after the already correct reasoning steps.<n>We show that suppressing self-affirmation reflections reduces output length without degrading accuracy across multiple models.<n>We also improve current train-based method by explicitly suppressing such reflections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T05:30:09Z)
• From Emergence to Control: Probing and Modulating Self-Reflection in Language Models [23.176641726866105]
  Self-reflection is a powerful behavior enabled by reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards.<n>We show that self-reflection is not exclusive to fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T20:40:13Z)
• Does Thinking More always Help? Mirage of Test-Time Scaling in Reasoning Models [130.5487886246353]
  Extending thinking traces using prompts like "Wait" or "Let me rethink" can improve performance.<n>This raises a natural question: Does thinking more at test-time truly lead to better reasoning?<n>We show a consistent pattern of initial performance improvements from additional thinking followed by a decline, due to "overthinking"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T17:55:09Z)
• Think or Not? Selective Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Language Models [67.87579664988199]
  TON is a two-stage training strategy for vision-language models (VLMs)<n>It introduces a think-or-not format that serves as a cold start for selective reasoning.<n>TON can reduce the completion length by up to 90% compared to vanilla GRPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T16:13:29Z)
• Let LRMs Break Free from Overthinking via Self-Braking Tuning [68.93713497579853]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) have significantly enhanced their reasoning capabilities by generating longer chains of thought.<n>This performance gain comes at the cost of a substantial increase in redundant reasoning during the generation process.<n>We propose a novel framework, Self-Braking Tuning (SBT), which tackles overthinking from the perspective of allowing the model to regulate its own reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T16:53:40Z)
• OpenVLThinker: Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative SFT-RL Cycles [91.88062410741833]
  We introduce OpenVLThinker, one of the first open-source large vision-language models (LVLMs) to exhibit sophisticated chain-of-thought reasoning.<n>We show that OpenVLThinker-7B consistently advances performance across six benchmarks demanding mathematical and general reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:52:43Z)
• GTR: Guided Thought Reinforcement Prevents Thought Collapse in RL-based VLM Agent Training [62.536191233049614]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable outcome rewards (RLVR) has effectively scaled up chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>This work investigates this problem through extensive experiments on complex card games, such as 24 points, and embodied tasks from ALFWorld.<n>We find that when rewards are based solely on action outcomes, RL fails to incentivize CoT reasoning in VLMs, instead leading to a phenomenon we termed thought collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T15:17:02Z)
• Reverse Thinking Makes LLMs Stronger Reasoners [90.42357659849215]
  RevThink is a framework composed of data augmentation and learning objectives.<n> Experiments across 12 datasets show an average 13.53% improvement over the student model's zero-shot performance.<n>RevThink also exhibits strong generalization to out-of-distribution held-out datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T17:27:05Z)
• Improve Vision Language Model Chain-of-thought Reasoning [86.83335752119741]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in vision language models (VLMs) is crucial for improving interpretability and trustworthiness. We show that training VLM on short answers does not generalize well to reasoning tasks that require more detailed responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T17:00:06Z)
• Reflective Instruction Tuning: Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models [36.119299938503936]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have shown promising performance on a variety of vision-language tasks. They remain susceptible to hallucinations, generating outputs misaligned with visual content or instructions. We propose reflective instruction tuning, which integrates rationale learning into visual instruction tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T06:32:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.