Aligning Clinical Needs and AI Capabilities: A Survey on LLMs for Medical Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07761v1
• Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 15:19:37 GMT
• Title: Aligning Clinical Needs and AI Capabilities: A Survey on LLMs for Medical Reasoning
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as important tools in healthcare, showing potential for clinical reasoning and patient care.<n>This survey examines recent progress in medical LLMs, focusing on reasoning applications and requirements.<n>We present a dual-view approach that connects clinical practice with computational methods.
• Score: 22.455011057828973
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as important tools in healthcare, showing growing potential for clinical reasoning and patient care. This survey examines recent progress in medical LLMs, focusing on reasoning applications and requirements. We present a dual-view approach that connects clinical practice with computational methods. On the clinical side, we establish a five-level competency scheme following Miller's Pyramid, progressing from knowledge recall to dynamic case management. On the computational side, we link deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning patterns to common medical goals and tasks. We also introduce a benchmark dataset spanning five levels of medical reasoning capability and report results on 18 state-of-the-art models, revealing that medical specialist models excel in diagnosis-centric tasks while general models lead in decision support and dialogue. We conclude by discussing current progress and open challenges, including data limitations, hallucination, and grounding issues, and outline directions toward safer, more reliable, and workflow-ready systems.

Related papers

• Teaching LLMs How ICU Physicians Approach Clinical Reasoning Through OMOP-Aligned Retrieval Improves Reasoning Across Clinical Domains [4.268872573319899]
  We introduce ICU-REACT, a reasoning dataset developed with 19 clinicians through a clinician-in-the-loop framework.<n>We fine-tuned Clin-REACT models spanning 8B-70B parameters and three model families.<n>Across five clinical reasoning benchmarks, Clin-REACT consistently outperformed its backbone models and open-source general-purpose and medical LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-23T22:14:04Z)
• Dr. Assistant: Enhancing Clinical Diagnostic Inquiry via Structured Diagnostic Reasoning Data and Reinforcement Learning [14.866862028323053]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in healthcare due to their extensive knowledge reserves, retrieval, and communication capabilities.<n>LLMs show promise and excel at medical benchmarks, their diagnostic reasoning and inquiry skills are constrained.<n>We propose (1) Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning Data (CDRD) structure to capture abstract clinical reasoning logic, and a pipeline for its construction, and (2) the Dr. Assistant, a clinical diagnostic model equipped with clinical reasoning and inquiry skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T07:43:57Z)
• MedDialogRubrics: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Evaluation Framework for Multi-turn Medical Consultations in Large Language Models [15.91764739198419]
  We present MedDialogRubrics, a novel benchmark comprising 5,200 synthetically constructed patient cases and over 60,000 fine-grained evaluation rubrics.<n>Our framework employs a multi-agent system to synthesize realistic patient records and chief complaints without accessing real-world electronic health records.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T13:56:33Z)
• Simulating Viva Voce Examinations to Evaluate Clinical Reasoning in Large Language Models [51.91760712805404]
  We introduce VivaBench, a benchmark for evaluating sequential clinical reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our dataset consists of 1762 physician-curated clinical vignettes structured as interactive scenarios that simulate a (oral) examination in medical training.<n>Our analysis identified several failure modes that mirror common cognitive errors in clinical practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T16:24:35Z)
• RAD: Towards Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Multi-modal Clinical Diagnosis [56.373297358647655]
  Retrieval-Augmented Diagnosis (RAD) is a novel framework that injects external knowledge into multimodal models directly on downstream tasks.<n>RAD operates through three key mechanisms: retrieval and refinement of disease-centered knowledge from multiple medical sources, a guideline-enhanced contrastive loss transformer, and a dual decoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T10:36:14Z)
• Reasoning LLMs in the Medical Domain: A Literature Survey [2.028864261411204]
  The emergence of advanced reasoning capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) marks a transformative development in healthcare applications.<n>This survey examines the transformation of medical LLMs from basic information retrieval tools to sophisticated clinical reasoning systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T14:59:19Z)
• Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications [59.721265428780946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine have enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning.<n>This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field.<n>We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies and test-time mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T14:41:31Z)
• Medchain: Bridging the Gap Between LLM Agents and Clinical Practice with Interactive Sequence [68.05876437208505]
  We present MedChain, a dataset of 12,163 clinical cases that covers five key stages of clinical workflow.<n>We also propose MedChain-Agent, an AI system that integrates a feedback mechanism and a MCase-RAG module to learn from previous cases and adapt its responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T15:25:02Z)
• DiReCT: Diagnostic Reasoning for Clinical Notes via Large Language Models [32.85606857702375]
  We aim at evaluating the reasoning ability and interpretability of large language models (LLMs) compared to human doctors.<n>The diagnostic reasoning dataset for clinical notes (DiReCT) contains 511 clinical notes, each meticulously annotated by physicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-04T05:15:02Z)
• Dr-LLaVA: Visual Instruction Tuning with Symbolic Clinical Grounding [53.629132242389716]
  Vision-Language Models (VLM) can support clinicians by analyzing medical images and engaging in natural language interactions. VLMs often exhibit "hallucinogenic" behavior, generating textual outputs not grounded in contextual multimodal information. We propose a new alignment algorithm that uses symbolic representations of clinical reasoning to ground VLMs in medical knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T23:19:28Z)
• VBridge: Connecting the Dots Between Features, Explanations, and Data for Healthcare Models [85.4333256782337]
  VBridge is a visual analytics tool that seamlessly incorporates machine learning explanations into clinicians' decision-making workflow. We identified three key challenges, including clinicians' unfamiliarity with ML features, lack of contextual information, and the need for cohort-level evidence. We demonstrated the effectiveness of VBridge through two case studies and expert interviews with four clinicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-04T17:34:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.