Closing the Null Space: Guidance-Aware Quantization for Classifier-Free Diffusion

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08241v1
• Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 08:42:07 GMT
• Title: Closing the Null Space: Guidance-Aware Quantization for Classifier-Free Diffusion
• Abstract summary: Two-pass CFG execution pattern imposes a latency overhead that parameter-count and bit-operation metrics conceal entirely.<n>Guidance-Aware Mixed Precision (GAMP) is proposed, which calibrates directly on the guided prediction.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deploying classifier-free guidance (CFG) diffusion models under real-world compute budgets requires quantization, yet existing post-training quantization (PTQ) methods treat CFG models as single-branch networks, ignoring the paired conditional/unconditional structure that CFG inference fundamentally relies on. This structural blind spot has two consequences. At the system level, the two-pass CFG execution pattern imposes a latency overhead that parameter-count and bit-operation metrics conceal entirely, and commodity INT8 inference stacks fail to realize the theoretical efficiency gains that BOPs calculations promise. At the algorithmic level, calibrating against the guidance gap alone admits an exact null space: a quantized model can achieve perfect gap-fidelity diagnostics while the unconditional branch drifts arbitrarily, corrupting every guided prediction at inference time. This paper terms this the branch-drift trap, proves its existence analytically, and confirms it empirically through a false-positive result in which the best-calibrated model by standard diagnostics simultaneously produces the worst sample quality. To close the trap, Guidance-Aware Mixed Precision (GAMP) is proposed, which calibrates directly on the guided prediction, derives per-layer activation-bit sensitivity from guided-output degradation, and allocates bits via a greedy knapsack -- provably preventing unconditional branch drift by construction.

Related papers

• Efficient Conditioning Why Pseudo Observation Batch Bayesian Optimization Works When It Does not [0.0]
  Constant Liar (CL), Kriging Believer (KB), and fantasy models are widely used for batch selection in parallel Bayesian Optimization.<n>We identify efficient conditioning as the key surrogate property the ability to update predictions in closed form when data is augmented.<n>We unify CL, KB, and fantasy models as instances of a single conditioning mechanism differing only in lie value distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T13:14:24Z)
• P-Guide: Parameter-Efficient Prior Steering for Single-Pass CFG Inference [7.28668585578288]
  We introduce textbfP-Guide, a framework that achieves high-quality guidance through a single inference pass.<n>Under a first-order approximation, P-Guide is equivalent to CFG in the sense that it steers generation from the prior space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T12:31:05Z)
• Learning from Emptiness: De-biasing Listwise Rerankers with Content-Agnostic Probability Calibration [76.08899010904652]
  CapCal is a training-free framework that mechanically decouples positional bias from ranking decisions.<n>It achieves superior performance among training-free methods while preserving single-pass efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-11T10:47:22Z)
• Diffusion Controller: Framework, Algorithms and Parameterization [54.82539154511621]
  We present a unified control-theoretic view that casts reverse diffusion sampling as state-only control within (generalized) linearly-solvable Markov Decision Processes.<n>Under this framework, control acts by reweighting the pretrained reverse-time transition kernels, balancing terminal objectives against an $f$-divergence cost.<n>Experiments on Stable Diffusion v1.4 show consistent gains in preference-alignment win rates and improved quality-efficiency trade-offs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-07T01:49:59Z)
• CFG-EC: Error Correction Classifier-Free Guidance [0.0]
  CFG-EC is a versatile correction scheme augmentable to any CFG-based method.<n>We show that CFG-EC handles the unconditional component more effectively than CFG and CFG++.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T03:08:38Z)
• Unsupervised Conformal Inference: Bootstrapping and Alignment to Control LLM Uncertainty [49.19257648205146]
  We propose an unsupervised conformal inference framework for generation.<n>Our gates achieve close-to-nominal coverage and provide tighter, more stable thresholds than split UCP.<n>The result is a label-free, API-compatible gate for test-time filtering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T23:40:47Z)
• Normalized Attention Guidance: Universal Negative Guidance for Diffusion Models [57.20761595019967]
  We present Normalized Attention Guidance (NAG), an efficient, training-free mechanism that applies extrapolation in attention space with L1-based normalization and refinement.<n>NAG restores effective negative guidance where CFG collapses while maintaining fidelity.<n>NAG generalizes across architectures (UNet, DiT), sampling regimes (few-step, multi-step), and modalities (image, video)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T13:30:46Z)
• Conditional Diffusion Models with Classifier-Free Gibbs-like Guidance [19.83064246586143]
  CFG is a technique for improving conditional diffusion models by linearly combining the outputs of conditional and unconditional denoisers.<n>While CFG enhances visual quality and improves alignment with prompts, it often reduces sample diversity.<n>We propose a Gibbs-like sampling procedure to draw samples from the desired tilted distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T12:27:33Z)
• Contrastive CFG: Improving CFG in Diffusion Models by Contrasting Positive and Negative Concepts [55.298031232672734]
  As-Free Guidance (CFG) has proven effective in conditional diffusion model sampling for improved condition alignment. We present a novel method to enhance negative CFG guidance using contrastive loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T03:29:27Z)
• Rectified Diffusion Guidance for Conditional Generation [94.83538269086613]
  We revisit the theory behind CFG and rigorously confirm that the improper combination coefficients (textiti.e.) brings about expectation shift the generative distribution.<n>We show that our approach enjoys a textbftextitform solution given the strength.<n> Empirical evidence on real-world data demonstrate the compatibility of our design with existing state-of-the-art diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T13:41:32Z)
• Distribution-free binary classification: prediction sets, confidence intervals and calibration [106.50279469344937]
  We study three notions of uncertainty quantification -- calibration, confidence intervals and prediction sets -- for binary classification in the distribution-free setting. We derive confidence intervals for binned probabilities for both fixed-width and uniform-mass binning. As a consequence of our 'tripod' theorems, these confidence intervals for binned probabilities lead to distribution-free calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T14:17:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.