UniClawBench: A Universal Benchmark for Proactive Agents on Real-World Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08768v1
• Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 17:59:32 GMT
• Title: UniClawBench: A Universal Benchmark for Proactive Agents on Real-World Tasks
• Abstract summary: We introduce UniClawBench, the first capability-driven benchmark to evaluate proactive agents in dynamic, real-world settings.<n>UniClawBench is built around five executor model capabilities: Skill Usage, Exploration, Long-Context Reasoning, Multimodal Understanding, and Cross-Platform Coordination.<n>Unlike previous benchmarks that rely on static, pre-recorded answers, our benchmark evaluates agents in live Docker containers using fine-grained, step-by-step completion checkpoints.
• Score: 43.36285223987099
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The rapid development of large language models and multimodal large language models has accelerated the emergence of proactive agents capable of operating everyday tools and assisting users in real-world environments. However, existing benchmarks struggle to evaluate such agents effectively, as they often rely on sandboxed environments and single-turn evaluation paradigms. Moreover, their scenario-based task taxonomies mix multiple model capabilities within the same task category, making it difficult to identify the root causes of agent failures. To address these limitations, we introduce UniClawBench, the first capability-driven benchmark designed to evaluate proactive agents in dynamic, real-world settings. UniClawBench is built around five foundational model capabilities: Skill Usage, Exploration, Long-Context Reasoning, Multimodal Understanding, and Cross-Platform Coordination. Based on these capabilities, we design 400 bilingual real-world tasks. Unlike previous benchmarks that rely on static, pre-recorded answers, our benchmark evaluates agents in live Docker containers using fine-grained, step-by-step completion checkpoints. Furthermore, we design a closed-loop evaluation strategy comprising an executor agent, a hidden supervisor agent, and a user agent to simulate realistic multi-turn human feedback without leaking grading criteria. To disentangle base model capabilities from framework-level design choices, we evaluate state-of-the-art models under multiple agent frameworks. Through comprehensive comparisons across both models and frameworks, we show how base model capabilities and agent framework designs jointly shape performance in real-world environments. To facilitate future research, we make our benchmark and code publicly available at https://github.com/HKU-MMLab/UniClawBench.

Related papers

• DuMateBench: Evaluating Autonomous Agents in Complex Real-World Workflows [69.12339622053588]
  We introduce DuMateBench, a real-session benchmark reconstructed from anonymized and privacy-screened user sessions.<n>The resulting benchmark comprises 200 tasks spanning 8 broad scenarios and 17 fine-grained capability categories.<n>We execute these tasks in isolated Docker containers injected with three forms of real-world environmental complexity: Insufficient, Unstable, and Noisy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-27T02:36:23Z)
• Running the Gauntlet: Re-evaluating the Capabilities of Agents Beyond Familiar Environments [67.2234316079859]
  GauntletBench is a web-based benchmark for evaluating agent generalisation in challenging scenarios.<n>It focuses on three underexplored capabilities (temporal perception, graphical understanding, and 3D reasoning) across five less-covered professional applications.<n>Our empirical results reveal that frontier agentic systems remain far from achieving human-level performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-12T12:32:24Z)
• The Meta-Agent Challenge: Are Current Agents Capable of Autonomous Agent Development? [80.24951682268332]
  We introduce the Meta-Agent Challenge (MAC), an evaluation framework designed to test the capacity of frontier models for autonomous agent development.<n>To ensure evaluation integrity, this framework is secured by multi-layer defenses against reward hacking.<n>We demonstrate that meta-agents rarely match human-engineered baseline policies, and the few that do are dominated by proprietary frontier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T04:58:17Z)
• EgoBench: An Interactive Egocentric Multimodal Benchmark for Tool-Using Agents [17.727481701114556]
  We introduce EgoBench, the first interactive multimodal benchmark for tool-using agents.<n>We implement a three-stage synergistic pipeline through which each task is designed to enforce the joint application of visual perception and tool-augmented multi-hop reasoning.<n>We additionally develop a multi-agent simulated user within EgoBench to evaluate agents' interaction capabilities, which generates high-fidelity, task-aligned responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T01:28:15Z)
• Agent World Model: Infinity Synthetic Environments for Agentic Reinforcement Learning [62.499592503950026]
  Large language model (LLM) have empowered autonomous agents to perform complex tasks that require multi-turn interactions with tools and environments.<n>We propose Agent World Model (AWM), a fully synthetic environment generation pipeline.<n>We scale to 1,000 environments covering everyday scenarios, in which agents can interact with rich toolsets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T18:55:41Z)
• AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World Contexts [35.52607495764441]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) based autonomous agents demonstrate multifaceted capabilities to contribute substantially to economic production.<n>We introduce AgencyBench, a benchmark derived from daily AI usage, evaluating 6 core agentic capabilities across 32 real-world scenarios.<n>These scenarios require an average of 90 tool calls, 1 million tokens, and hours of execution time to resolve.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T07:22:20Z)
• BenchAgents: Multi-Agent Systems for Structured Benchmark Creation [23.653678381444276]
  BenchAgents is a framework that automates the creation of evaluation benchmarks.<n>We use BenchAgents to create benchmarks to evaluate capabilities related to planning, constraint satisfaction, and causal reasoning.<n>We then use these benchmarks to study state-of-the-art models and extract new insights into common failure modes and model differences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T22:56:18Z)
• CRAB: Cross-environment Agent Benchmark for Multimodal Language Model Agents [49.68117560675367]
  Crab is the first benchmark framework designed to support cross-environment tasks.<n>Our framework supports multiple devices and can be easily extended to any environment with a Python interface.<n>The experimental results demonstrate that the single agent with GPT-4o achieves the best completion ratio of 38.01%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T17:55:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.