DuMateBench: Evaluating Autonomous Agents in Complex Real-World Workflows

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26546v1
• Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 02:36:23 GMT
• Title: DuMateBench: Evaluating Autonomous Agents in Complex Real-World Workflows
• Abstract summary: We introduce DuMateBench, a real-session benchmark reconstructed from anonymized and privacy-screened user sessions.<n>The resulting benchmark comprises 200 tasks spanning 8 broad scenarios and 17 fine-grained capability categories.<n>We execute these tasks in isolated Docker containers injected with three forms of real-world environmental complexity: Insufficient, Unstable, and Noisy.
• Score: 69.12339622053588
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous agents are increasingly adopted to complete complex, multi-tool workflows in real-world settings. However, existing benchmarks typically separate tasks by application or capability and evaluate agents in environments that are cleaner and more stable than those encountered in practice. We introduce DuMateBench, a real-session benchmark reconstructed from anonymized and privacy-screened user sessions collected from a large-scale production agent platform. Each task preserves the relevant pre-solution interaction history, persistent configurations, and workspace state, and is then validated through human verification. The resulting benchmark comprises 200 tasks spanning 8 broad scenarios and 17 fine-grained capability categories, with most tasks requiring multiple capability coordination. We execute these tasks in isolated Docker containers injected with three forms of real-world environmental complexity: Insufficient, Unstable, and Noisy, and assess performance using a hybrid deterministic and LLM-as-Judge evaluation protocol. Experiments across five representative autonomous-agent frameworks paired with four state-of-the-art LLMs reveal substantial gaps in strict task completion. Complementary robustness, efficiency, and diagnostic analyses further show that performance under environmental perturbations is jointly shaped by the capabilities of the LLM and the surrounding agent framework. The code and data are publicly available at https://dumatebench.com/.

Related papers

• UniClawBench: A Universal Benchmark for Proactive Agents on Real-World Tasks [43.36285223987099]
  We introduce UniClawBench, the first capability-driven benchmark to evaluate proactive agents in dynamic, real-world settings.<n>UniClawBench is built around five executor model capabilities: Skill Usage, Exploration, Long-Context Reasoning, Multimodal Understanding, and Cross-Platform Coordination.<n>Unlike previous benchmarks that rely on static, pre-recorded answers, our benchmark evaluates agents in live Docker containers using fine-grained, step-by-step completion checkpoints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-09T17:59:32Z)
• SWE-Cycle: Benchmarking Code Agents across the Complete Issue Resolution Cycle [46.833916047516716]
  SWE-Cycle is a benchmark of 489 rigorously filtered instances of autonomous code agents.<n>SWE-Judge combines static code review with dynamic testing to accurately verify functional correctness.<n>The results reveal a sharp drop in solve rates when transitioning from isolated tasks to FullCycle execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T08:05:16Z)
• ComplexMCP: Evaluation of LLM Agents in Dynamic, Interdependent, and Large-Scale Tool Sandbox [61.862814740220806]
  $textbfComplexMCP$ is a benchmark designed to evaluate agents in rigorous conditions.<n>Built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), $textbfComplexMCP$ provides over 300 meticulously tested tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T16:20:51Z)
• LiveClawBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Complex, Real-World Assistant Tasks [58.3639630490749]
  We introduce LiveClawBench, a benchmark to evaluate LLM agents on real-world assistant tasks.<n>Based on an analysis of various realClaw usage cases, we derive a Triple-Axis Complexity Framework.<n>We construct a pilot benchmark with explicit complexity-factor annotations, covering real-world assistant tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T16:08:21Z)
• Agent World Model: Infinity Synthetic Environments for Agentic Reinforcement Learning [62.499592503950026]
  Large language model (LLM) have empowered autonomous agents to perform complex tasks that require multi-turn interactions with tools and environments.<n>We propose Agent World Model (AWM), a fully synthetic environment generation pipeline.<n>We scale to 1,000 environments covering everyday scenarios, in which agents can interact with rich toolsets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T18:55:41Z)
• VitaBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents with Versatile Interactive Tasks in Real-world Applications [20.065087936770215]
  We introduce VitaBench, a benchmark that evaluates agents on versatile interactive tasks grounded in real-world settings.<n>VitaBench presents agents with the most complex life-serving simulation environment to date, comprising 66 tools.<n>Our comprehensive evaluation reveals that even the most advanced models achieve only 30% success rate on cross-scenario tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T16:33:49Z)
• MSCoRe: A Benchmark for Multi-Stage Collaborative Reasoning in LLM Agents [7.339769470891067]
  MSCoRe is a novel benchmark comprising 126696 domain-specific QA instances spanning scenarios in automotive, pharmaceutical, electronics, and energy sectors.<n>The commercial models performed best across all tasks and scenarios, but a notable gap in ROUGE scores remains between simple and complex tasks.<n>MSCoRe provides a valuable new resource for the community to evaluate and improve multi-stage reasoning in LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T11:36:16Z)
• What Limits Virtual Agent Application? OmniBench: A Scalable Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Essential Virtual Agent Capabilities [56.646832992178105]
  We introduce OmniBench, a cross-platform, graph-based benchmark with an automated pipeline for synthesizing tasks of controllable complexity.<n>We present OmniEval, a multidimensional evaluation framework that includes subtask-level evaluation, graph-based metrics, and comprehensive tests across 10 capabilities.<n>Our dataset contains 36k graph-structured tasks across 20 scenarios, achieving a 91% human acceptance rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T15:59:38Z)
• CRAB: Cross-environment Agent Benchmark for Multimodal Language Model Agents [49.68117560675367]
  Crab is the first benchmark framework designed to support cross-environment tasks.<n>Our framework supports multiple devices and can be easily extended to any environment with a Python interface.<n>The experimental results demonstrate that the single agent with GPT-4o achieves the best completion ratio of 38.01%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T17:55:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.