PRecG: Legal Precedent Retrieval with Graph Neural Networks and Rhetorical Role Segmentation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09094v1
• Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 04:35:04 GMT
• Title: PRecG: Legal Precedent Retrieval with Graph Neural Networks and Rhetorical Role Segmentation
• Abstract summary: Legal precedent retrieval is a fundamental task in legal case preparation, planning, litigation strategy, and legal research.<n>Current approaches for automatic precedent retrieval map legal documents to a low-dimensional semantic space and compute similarity based on the proximity of their representations.<n>We propose the PRecG pipeline that computes the similarity between pairs of legal judgments by hierarchically learning their representations.
• Score: 4.879930398426088
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Legal precedent retrieval is a fundamental task in legal case preparation, planning, litigation strategy, and legal research. Current approaches for automatic precedent retrieval map legal documents to a low-dimensional semantic space and compute similarity based on the proximity of their representations. These approaches treat legal documents as monolithic texts, ignoring the rhetorical organization of the legal technicalities. Ergo, they overlook nuanced legal meanings and fail to distinguish the contextual significance of legal entities and concepts that vary based on their rhetorical roles within the document. To address this insufficiency, we propose the PRecG pipeline that computes the similarity between pairs of legal judgments by hierarchically learning their representations. The process begins by decomposing each document into distinct semantic units (segments) based on the rhetorical roles of sentences. For each rhetorical segment, a knowledge graph is constructed to capture the legal entities and their relationships within the segment. Contextual representations of the entities are then learned and aggregated to derive segment-level embeddings. These embeddings are further integrated to produce a unified document-level representation, and finally, the semantic similarity between a pair of documents is computed. We validate the performance of the proposed approach through extensive experiments on a benchmark Indian legal dataset, comparing it against state-of-the-art baselines to demonstrate its effectiveness.

Related papers

• Dissecting Judicial Reasoning in U.S. Copyright Damage Awards [0.21485350418225238]
  judicial reasoning in copyright damage awards poses a core challenge for computational legal analysis.<n>Federal courts follow the 1976 Copyright Act, their interpretations and factor weightings vary widely across jurisdictions.<n>This research introduces a novel discourse-based Large Language Model (LLM) methodology that integrates Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) with an agentic workflow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T13:09:16Z)
• LegalSeg: Unlocking the Structure of Indian Legal Judgments Through Rhetorical Role Classification [6.549338652948716]
  We introduce LegalSeg, the largest annotated dataset for this task, comprising over 7,000 documents and 1.4 million sentences, labeled with 7 rhetorical roles.<n>Our results demonstrate that models incorporating broader context, structural relationships, and sequential sentence information outperform those relying solely on sentence-level features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T10:07:05Z)
• Contextual Document Embeddings [77.22328616983417]
  We propose two complementary methods for contextualized document embeddings. First, an alternative contrastive learning objective that explicitly incorporates the document neighbors into the intra-batch contextual loss. Second, a new contextual architecture that explicitly encodes neighbor document information into the encoded representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T14:33:34Z)
• DELTA: Pre-train a Discriminative Encoder for Legal Case Retrieval via Structural Word Alignment [55.91429725404988]
  We introduce DELTA, a discriminative model designed for legal case retrieval. We leverage shallow decoders to create information bottlenecks, aiming to enhance the representation ability. Our approach can outperform existing state-of-the-art methods in legal case retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T10:40:14Z)
• MUSER: A Multi-View Similar Case Retrieval Dataset [65.36779942237357]
  Similar case retrieval (SCR) is a representative legal AI application that plays a pivotal role in promoting judicial fairness. Existing SCR datasets only focus on the fact description section when judging the similarity between cases. We present M, a similar case retrieval dataset based on multi-view similarity measurement and comprehensive legal element with sentence-level legal element annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T08:17:11Z)
• Rhetorical Role Labeling of Legal Documents using Transformers and Graph Neural Networks [1.290382979353427]
  This paper presents the approaches undertaken to perform the task of rhetorical role labelling on Indian Court Judgements as part of SemEval Task 6: understanding legal texts, shared subtask A.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-06T17:04:51Z)
• SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case Retrieval [75.05173891207214]
  Legal case retrieval plays a core role in the intelligent legal system. Most existing language models have difficulty understanding the long-distance dependencies between different structures. We propose a new Structure-Aware pre-traIned language model for LEgal case Retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-22T10:47:01Z)
• PropSegmEnt: A Large-Scale Corpus for Proposition-Level Segmentation and Entailment Recognition [63.51569687229681]
  We argue for the need to recognize the textual entailment relation of each proposition in a sentence individually. We propose PropSegmEnt, a corpus of over 45K propositions annotated by expert human raters. Our dataset structure resembles the tasks of (1) segmenting sentences within a document to the set of propositions, and (2) classifying the entailment relation of each proposition with respect to a different yet topically-aligned document.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T04:03:33Z)
• GERE: Generative Evidence Retrieval for Fact Verification [57.78768817972026]
  We propose GERE, the first system that retrieves evidences in a generative fashion. The experimental results on the FEVER dataset show that GERE achieves significant improvements over the state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-12T03:49:35Z)
• Corpus for Automatic Structuring of Legal Documents [1.8025738207124173]
  We introduce a corpus of legal judgment documents in English that are segmented into topical and coherent parts. We develop baseline models for automatically predicting rhetorical roles in a legal document based on the annotated corpus. We show the application of rhetorical roles to improve performance on the tasks of summarization and legal judgment prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T11:12:44Z)
• Semantic Segmentation of Legal Documents via Rhetorical Roles [3.285073688021526]
  This paper proposes a Rhetorical Roles (RR) system for segmenting a legal document into semantically coherent units. We develop a multitask learning-based deep learning model with document rhetorical role label shift as an auxiliary task for segmenting a legal document.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-03T10:49:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.