Does YOLO26 Truly Offer Advantages Over Its Predecessors for Edge Deployment? A Benchmark Study in Aquaculture

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09835v1
• Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:38:04 GMT
• Title: Does YOLO26 Truly Offer Advantages Over Its Predecessors for Edge Deployment? A Benchmark Study in Aquaculture
• Abstract summary: The recently introduced YOLO26 architecture incorporates NMS-free end-to-end inference and is optimized for deployment on resource-constrained CPU-based devices.<n>This study presents a benchmark of YOLO26 against three Ultralytics predecessors across nano, small, and medium model scales for fish mortality detection.
• Score: 10.984180846607808
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The recently introduced YOLO26 architecture incorporates NMS-free end-to-end inference and is optimized for deployment on resource-constrained CPU-based devices, making it well-suited for edge-based aquaculture applications. However, its performance, operational efficiency, and deployment suitability have not been systematically validated in aquaculture-specific scenarios. This study presents a comprehensive benchmark of YOLO26 against three Ultralytics predecessors (YOLOv5u, YOLOv8, and YOLO11) across nano, small, and medium model scales for fish mortality detection, a critical indicator of fish population health and welfare. Twelve model variants were evaluated for detection accuracy, training efficiency across seven dataset sizes, and inference performance on high-performance NVIDIA A100 GPUs and a CPU-only Raspberry Pi 5 edge platform. All models achieved comparable performance on the full dataset, with mAP50 differing by only 1.04 percentage points, indicating that architectural generation has little influence on final detection accuracy when sufficient training data are available. However, clear trade-offs emerged in data efficiency and deployment performance. YOLOv8 achieved 90% mAP50 with only 400 training images, whereas the YOLO26 nano and small variants required 1,000 images to reach comparable accuracy. Conversely, YOLO26n achieved the highest inference speed on the Raspberry Pi 5 (7.51 FPS), while YOLOv5mu outperformed all contemporary medium-scale architectures on CPU-based hardware. These results show that architectural novelty alone is insufficient for model selection and that training data availability, target hardware, and inference requirements should be considered jointly when selecting object detection models for practical edge AI deployment in aquaculture.

Related papers

• Cross-Generation Optimization of YOLOv26, YOLOv11, and YOLOv8 for Fine-Grained Small-Object Detection and Instance Segmentation in Complex Orchards [3.2882817259131403]
  This study presents a cross-generation benchmark of Ultralytics YOLOv8, YOLOv11, and YOLOv26 for detecting and segmenting apple fruitlet, calyx, and peduncle structures.<n>Peduncle remained the most challenging class. Overall, compact-to-moderate YOLO models with small-object-focused training provided favorable accuracy efficiency trade-offs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-23T17:00:22Z)
• Resource-Constrained UAV-Based Weed Detection for Site-Specific Management on Edge Devices [8.041496192545946]
  This study proposes a deployment-oriented framework for real-time UAV-based weed detection on resource-constrained edge platforms.<n>A diverse set of state-of-the-art object detection models is evaluated, including convolution-based YOLO models.<n> lightweight models achieve 66%-71% mAP50 with significantly lower latency, enabling real-time performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-25T20:58:51Z)
• A Comprehensive Evaluation of YOLO-based Deer Detection Performance on Edge Devices [6.486957474966142]
  The escalating economic losses in agriculture due to deer intrusion, estimated to be in the hundreds of millions of dollars annually in the U.S., highlight the inadequacy of traditional mitigation strategies.<n>This underscores a critical need for intelligent, autonomous solutions capable of real-time deer detection and deterrence.<n>This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art deep learning models for deer detection in challenging real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T17:01:50Z)
• A Comparative Study of YOLOv8 to YOLOv11 Performance in Underwater Vision Tasks [0.0]
  One-stage detectors from the YOLO family are attractive because they fuse localization and classification in a single, low-latency network.<n>We curate two datasets that span contrasting operating conditions: a Coral Disease set (4,480 images, 18 classes) and a Fish Species set (7,500 images, 20 classes)<n>We train YOLOvs, YOLOv9-s, YOLOv10-s, and YOLOv11-s with identical hyperferences and evaluate precision, recall, mAP50, mAP50-95, per-image inference time, and frames-per-second (FPS)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T05:12:59Z)
• YOLOv13: Real-Time Object Detection with Hypergraph-Enhanced Adaptive Visual Perception [58.06752127687312]
  We propose YOLOv13, an accurate and lightweight object detector.<n>We propose a Hypergraph-based Adaptive Correlation Enhancement (HyperACE) mechanism.<n>We also propose a Full-Pipeline Aggregation-and-Distribution (FullPAD) paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-21T15:15:03Z)
• YOLO Evolution: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Architectural Review of YOLOv12, YOLO11, and Their Previous Versions [0.0]
  This study represents the first comprehensive experimental evaluation of YOLOv3 to the latest version, YOLOv12.<n>The challenges considered include varying object sizes, diverse aspect ratios, and small-sized objects of a single class.<n>Our analysis highlights the distinctive strengths and limitations of each YOLO version.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T20:45:00Z)
• YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detection [68.28699631793967]
  YOLOs have emerged as the predominant paradigm in the field of real-time object detection. The reliance on the non-maximum suppression (NMS) for post-processing hampers the end-to-end deployment of YOLOs. We introduce the holistic efficiency-accuracy driven model design strategy for YOLOs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T11:44:29Z)
• YOLO-MS: Rethinking Multi-Scale Representation Learning for Real-time Object Detection [63.36722419180875]
  We provide an efficient and performant object detector, termed YOLO-MS.<n>We train our YOLO-MS on the MS COCO dataset from scratch without relying on any other large-scale datasets.<n>Our work can also serve as a plug-and-play module for other YOLO models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-10T10:12:27Z)
• YOLOBench: Benchmarking Efficient Object Detectors on Embedded Systems [0.0873811641236639]
  We present YOLOBench, a benchmark comprised of 550+ YOLO-based object detection models on 4 different datasets and 4 different embedded hardware platforms. We collect accuracy and latency numbers for a variety of YOLO-based one-stage detectors at different model scales by performing a fair, controlled comparison of these detectors with a fixed training environment. We evaluate training-free accuracy estimators used in neural architecture search on YOLOBench and demonstrate that, while most state-of-the-art zero-cost accuracy estimators are outperformed by a simple baseline like MAC count, some of them can be effectively used to
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-26T01:51:10Z)
• Exploring the Effectiveness of Dataset Synthesis: An application of Apple Detection in Orchards [68.95806641664713]
  We explore the usability of Stable Diffusion 2.1-base for generating synthetic datasets of apple trees for object detection. We train a YOLOv5m object detection model to predict apples in a real-world apple detection dataset. Results demonstrate that the model trained on generated data is slightly underperforming compared to a baseline model trained on real-world images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T09:46:01Z)
• EdgeYOLO: An Edge-Real-Time Object Detector [69.41688769991482]
  This paper proposes an efficient, low-complexity and anchor-free object detector based on the state-of-the-art YOLO framework. We develop an enhanced data augmentation method to effectively suppress overfitting during training, and design a hybrid random loss function to improve the detection accuracy of small objects. Our baseline model can reach the accuracy of 50.6% AP50:95 and 69.8% AP50 in MS 2017 dataset, 26.4% AP50:95 and 44.8% AP50 in VisDrone 2019-DET dataset, and it meets real-time requirements (FPS>=30) on edge-computing device Nvidia
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T06:05:14Z)
• A lightweight and accurate YOLO-like network for small target detection in Aerial Imagery [94.78943497436492]
  We present YOLO-S, a simple, fast and efficient network for small target detection. YOLO-S exploits a small feature extractor based on Darknet20, as well as skip connection, via both bypass and concatenation. YOLO-S has an 87% decrease of parameter size and almost one half FLOPs of YOLOv3, making practical the deployment for low-power industrial applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-05T16:29:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.