Can Agentic Trading Systems Pay for Their Own Intelligence?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10286v1
• Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 12:31:54 GMT
• Title: Can Agentic Trading Systems Pay for Their Own Intelligence?
• Abstract summary: We introduce TradeLens, a trace-grounded diagnostic toolkit for evaluating agentic trading systems.<n>We conduct extensive analysis across backbone models, capital scales, trading frequencies, and system architectures.<n>Our results show that viability hinges on intelligence-to-profit conversion.
• Score: 42.600136171993874
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly used in trading systems, where model reasoning, tool use, and continual decisions incur costs that are expected to produce trading value. Existing evaluations typically report performance metrics, but rarely examine agentic viability: whether dynamic LLM-mediated decisions convert their induced costs into measurable incremental profit. To apply this criterion, we introduce TradeLens, a trace-grounded diagnostic toolkit for evaluating agentic trading systems from their trading records, runtime traces, and deployment configurations. It reconstructs trading trajectories, attributes profit and cost to interpretable evidence, and diagnoses whether and why an agent pays for its own intelligence. We conduct extensive analysis across backbone models, capital scales, trading frequencies, and system architectures, together with deployment discussion. Our results show that viability hinges on intelligence-to-profit conversion: models exhibit different failure patterns, such as poor asset selection in DeepSeek-V3.2 and negative timing in GLM-4.7, while capital scale, trading frequency, and architecture matter only by amplifying or degrading decision-attributed timing value. These findings reframe the evaluation of LLM-based trading agents from capability-centric performance ranking to trace-grounded diagnosis of intelligence-to-profit conversion. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TradeLens.

Related papers

• Poisoning Agentic Alpha: Adversarial Vulnerabilities Across Roles and Architectures in Multi-Agent Trading Systems [103.90831279037094]
  LLM-based multi-agent trading systems are moving rapidly from research prototypes to live deployments that control real assets.<n>A corrupted signal can propagate to the final decision and translate into realized financial loss.<n>We present the first systematic empirical study in the financial domain to characterize how an adversarial signal enters a multi-agent trading system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T05:07:37Z)
• Beyond Agent Architecture: Execution Assumptions and Reproducibility in LLM-Based Trading Systems [5.264406906731695]
  This article presents a targeted topical review and audit of execution realism in large language models (LLMs) trading research.<n>A coded evidence matrix covering 30 trade-relevant primary studies is used to assess point-in-time controls, split transparency, held-out evaluation, cost and turnover treatment, execution semantics, universe definition, and artifact release.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-06T18:14:29Z)
• From Knowing to Doing: A Memory-Controlled Benchmark for LLM Trading Agents on Stock Markets [34.699961175708815]
  KTD-Fin is an end-to-end stock-market trading benchmark.<n>It separates historical market memory from investment decision-making.<n>It incorporates a Barra-style performance attribution framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T11:57:10Z)
• When Agents Trade: Live Multi-Market Trading Benchmark for LLM Agents [74.55061622246824]
  Agent Market Arena (AMA) is the first lifelong, real-time benchmark for evaluating Large Language Model (LLM)-based trading agents.<n>AMA integrates verified trading data, expert-checked news, and diverse agent architectures within a unified trading framework.<n>It evaluates agents across GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, Claude-3.5-haiku, Claude-sonnet-4, and Gemini-2.0-flash.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T17:54:09Z)
• Trade in Minutes! Rationality-Driven Agentic System for Quantitative Financial Trading [57.28635022507172]
  TiMi is a rationality-driven multi-agent system that architecturally decouples strategy development from minute-level deployment.<n>We propose a two-tier analytical paradigm from macro patterns to micro customization, layered programming design for trading bot implementation, and closed-loop optimization driven by mathematical reflection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T13:08:55Z)
• TradingGroup: A Multi-Agent Trading System with Self-Reflection and Data-Synthesis [15.865159423176982]
  TradingGroup is a multi-agent trading system designed to address limitations through a self-reflective architecture and an end-to-end data-synthesis pipeline.<n> TradingGroup consists of specialized agents for news sentiment analysis, financial report interpretation, stock trend forecasting, trading style adaptation, and a trading decision making agent.<n>Specifically, we design self-reflection mechanisms for the stock forecasting, style, and decision-making agents to distill past successes and failures for similar reasoning in analogous future scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T00:29:58Z)
• To Trade or Not to Trade: An Agentic Approach to Estimating Market Risk Improves Trading Decisions [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in agentic frameworks.<n>We develop an agentic system that uses LLMs to iteratively discover differential equations for financial time series.<n>We find that model-informed trading strategies outperform standard LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T13:29:32Z)
• Agent Trading Arena: A Study on Numerical Understanding in LLM-Based Agents [69.58565132975504]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language tasks.<n>We present the Agent Trading Arena, a virtual zero-sum stock market in which LLM-based agents engage in competitive multi-agent trading.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T08:41:01Z)
• When AI Meets Finance (StockAgent): Large Language Model-based Stock Trading in Simulated Real-world Environments [55.19252983108372]
  We have developed a multi-agent AI system called StockAgent, driven by LLMs. The StockAgent allows users to evaluate the impact of different external factors on investor trading. It avoids the test set leakage issue present in existing trading simulation systems based on AI Agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T06:49:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.