Can Induced Emotion Bias LLM Behaviors in Sequential Decision Making?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.12631v1
• Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 11:09:51 GMT
• Title: Can Induced Emotion Bias LLM Behaviors in Sequential Decision Making?
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in high-stakes domains.<n>We investigate whether induced emotion can influence their sequential decision-making using the Iowa Gambling Task.<n>We find that, different from humans, induced emotion does not significantly bias the decision dynamics of LLM agents on average.
• Score: 64.5408523407693
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in high-stakes domains, understanding contextual factors that may modulate their decision-making becomes critical. While LLMs are trained to perceive and resonate with users' emotions, it remains unclear whether induced emotion can influence their sequential decision-making. We investigate this question using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), a classic psychological paradigm for studying decision-making under uncertainty, combined with an imagination-based emotion induction procedure. We first validate the feasibility of this paradigm by confirming that LLMs can sense strong, distinguishable emotions from context and that LLM agents can learn from sequential interactions in a human-like pace. With the validated setup, we find that, different from humans, induced emotion does not significantly bias the decision dynamics of LLM agents on average. However, the effects of anger are conditioned: inducing anger makes LLM agents less sensitive to penalties for bad decisions, and in early stages of the game, anger can lower exploration, locking decisions into a few choices early. These findings reveal the subtle yet distinct effects of induced emotion on LLM decision-making compared to human behavior, and provide a tool for future research on affective modulation of LLM agents.

Related papers

• Do Emotions in Prompts Matter? Effects of Emotional Framing on Large Language Models [5.079126066502806]
  Emotional tone is pervasive in human communication, yet its influence on large language model (LLM) behaviour remains unclear.<n>Here, we examine how first-person emotional framing in user-side queries affect LLM performance across six benchmark domains.<n>We introduce EmotionRL, an adaptive emotional prompting framework that selects emotional framing adaptively for each query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T16:31:08Z)
• How Emotion Shapes the Behavior of LLMs and Agents: A Mechanistic Study [33.5007842598689]
  We investigate whether emotional signals can shape the behavior of large language models (LLMs) and agents.<n>Existing emotion-aware studies mainly treat emotion as a surface-level style factor or a perception target.<n>We propose E-STEER, an interpretable emotion steering framework that enables direct representation-level intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T12:20:02Z)
• Emotion-Coherent Reasoning for Multimodal LLMs via Emotional Rationale Verifier [53.55996102181836]
  We propose the Emotional Rationale Verifier (ERV) and an Explanation Reward.<n>Our method guides the model to produce reasoning that is explicitly consistent with the target emotion.<n>We show that our approach not only enhances alignment between explanation and prediction but also empowers MLLMs to deliver emotionally coherent, trustworthy interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T16:40:17Z)
• AI with Emotions: Exploring Emotional Expressions in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) play role-play as agents answering questions with specified emotional states.<n>Russell's Circumplex model characterizes emotions along the sleepy-activated (arousal) and pleasure-displeasure (valence) axes.<n> evaluation showed that the emotional states of the generated answers were consistent with the specifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T18:49:25Z)
• Don't Get Too Excited -- Eliciting Emotions in LLMs [1.8399318639816038]
  This paper investigates the challenges of affect control in large language models (LLMs)<n>We evaluate state-of-the-art open-weight LLMs to assess their affective expressive range.<n>We quantify the models' capacity to express a wide spectrum of emotions and how they fluctuate during interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T10:06:41Z)
• Do Emotions Really Affect Argument Convincingness? A Dynamic Approach with LLM-based Manipulation Checks [22.464222858889084]
  We introduce a dynamic framework inspired by manipulation checks commonly used in psychology and social science.<n>This framework examines the extent to which perceived emotional intensity influences perceived convincingness.<n>We find that in over half of cases, human judgments of convincingness remain unchanged despite variations in perceived emotional intensity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T10:04:44Z)
• "I'm Not Sure, But...": Examining the Impact of Large Language Models' Uncertainty Expression on User Reliance and Trust [51.542856739181474]
  We show how different natural language expressions of uncertainty impact participants' reliance, trust, and overall task performance. We find that first-person expressions decrease participants' confidence in the system and tendency to agree with the system's answers, while increasing participants' accuracy. Our findings suggest that using natural language expressions of uncertainty may be an effective approach for reducing overreliance on LLMs, but that the precise language used matters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T16:43:55Z)
• The Strong Pull of Prior Knowledge in Large Language Models and Its Impact on Emotion Recognition [74.04775677110179]
  In-context Learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for performing natural language tasks with Large Language Models (LLM) We show that LLMs have strong yet inconsistent priors in emotion recognition that ossify their predictions. Our results suggest that caution is needed when using ICL with larger LLMs for affect-centered tasks outside their pre-training domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T19:07:32Z)
• Emotionally Numb or Empathetic? Evaluating How LLMs Feel Using EmotionBench [83.41621219298489]
  We evaluate Large Language Models' (LLMs) anthropomorphic capabilities using the emotion appraisal theory from psychology. We collect a dataset containing over 400 situations that have proven effective in eliciting the eight emotions central to our study. We conduct a human evaluation involving more than 1,200 subjects worldwide.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T15:18:30Z)
• Large Language Models Understand and Can be Enhanced by Emotional Stimuli [53.53886609012119]
  We take the first step towards exploring the ability of Large Language Models to understand emotional stimuli. Our experiments show that LLMs have a grasp of emotional intelligence, and their performance can be improved with emotional prompts. Our human study results demonstrate that EmotionPrompt significantly boosts the performance of generative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T00:57:12Z)
• Inducing anxiety in large language models can induce bias [47.85323153767388]
  We focus on twelve established large language models (LLMs) and subject them to a questionnaire commonly used in psychiatry. Our results show that six of the latest LLMs respond robustly to the anxiety questionnaire, producing comparable anxiety scores to humans. Anxiety-induction not only influences LLMs' scores on an anxiety questionnaire but also influences their behavior in a previously-established benchmark measuring biases such as racism and ageism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T16:29:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.